2023-09-12 15:30:18

by Zhang, Tina

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/6] iommu/vt-d: Remove mm->pasid in intel_sva_bind_mm()

The pasid is passed in as a parameter through .set_dev_pasid() callback.
Thus, intel_sva_bind_mm() can directly use it instead of retrieving the
pasid value from mm->pasid.

Suggested-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tina Zhang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index 50a481c895b8..3c531af58658 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -290,21 +290,22 @@ static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
}

static int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
- struct mm_struct *mm)
+ struct iommu_domain *domain, ioasid_t pasid)
{
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct mm_struct *mm = domain->mm;
struct intel_svm_dev *sdev;
struct intel_svm *svm;
unsigned long sflags;
int ret = 0;

- svm = pasid_private_find(mm->pasid);
+ svm = pasid_private_find(pasid);
if (!svm) {
svm = kzalloc(sizeof(*svm), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!svm)
return -ENOMEM;

- svm->pasid = mm->pasid;
+ svm->pasid = pasid;
svm->mm = mm;
INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&svm->devs);

@@ -342,7 +343,7 @@ static int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,

/* Setup the pasid table: */
sflags = cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LA57) ? PASID_FLAG_FL5LP : 0;
- ret = intel_pasid_setup_first_level(iommu, dev, mm->pgd, mm->pasid,
+ ret = intel_pasid_setup_first_level(iommu, dev, mm->pgd, pasid,
FLPT_DEFAULT_DID, sflags);
if (ret)
goto free_sdev;
@@ -356,7 +357,7 @@ static int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
free_svm:
if (list_empty(&svm->devs)) {
mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier, mm);
- pasid_private_remove(mm->pasid);
+ pasid_private_remove(pasid);
kfree(svm);
}

@@ -796,9 +797,8 @@ static int intel_svm_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
{
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
- struct mm_struct *mm = domain->mm;

- return intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm);
+ return intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, domain, pasid);
}

static void intel_svm_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
--
2.34.1


2023-09-13 02:30:00

by Lu Baolu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] iommu/vt-d: Remove mm->pasid in intel_sva_bind_mm()

On 9/12/23 8:59 PM, Tina Zhang wrote:
> The pasid is passed in as a parameter through .set_dev_pasid() callback.
> Thus, intel_sva_bind_mm() can directly use it instead of retrieving the
> pasid value from mm->pasid.
>
> Suggested-by: Lu Baolu<[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tina Zhang<[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

The intel_svm_bind_mm() could be further merged into
intel_svm_set_dev_pasid(). It's fine if you keep it as is since we need
more cleanup and refactoring work after this series get merged.

So,

Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]>

Best regards,
baolu

2023-09-22 04:40:50

by Jason Gunthorpe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] iommu/vt-d: Remove mm->pasid in intel_sva_bind_mm()

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:59:32PM +0800, Tina Zhang wrote:
> The pasid is passed in as a parameter through .set_dev_pasid() callback.
> Thus, intel_sva_bind_mm() can directly use it instead of retrieving the
> pasid value from mm->pasid.
>
> Suggested-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tina Zhang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>

I would order this patch first in the series

Jason

2023-09-22 05:31:40

by Zhang, Tina

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] iommu/vt-d: Remove mm->pasid in intel_sva_bind_mm()



On 9/22/23 02:56, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:59:32PM +0800, Tina Zhang wrote:
>> The pasid is passed in as a parameter through .set_dev_pasid() callback.
>> Thus, intel_sva_bind_mm() can directly use it instead of retrieving the
>> pasid value from mm->pasid.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Tina Zhang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 14 +++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
>
> I would order this patch first in the series
OK.

Thanks,
-Tina
>
> Jason