2015-08-18 18:44:45

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: add veyron-jaq board

a.k.a. Haier Chromebook 11

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexandru M Stan <[email protected]>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts | 176 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
index 7805a6541a38..7a2c3c88ce9e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += \
rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtb \
rk3288-veyron-minnie.dtb \
rk3288-veyron-pinky.dtb \
+ rk3288-veyron-jaq.dtb \
rk3288-veyron-speedy.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C24XX) += \
s3c2416-smdk2416.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ea6130156216
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+/*
+ * Google Veyron Jaq Rev 1+ board device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright 2015 Google, Inc
+ *
+ * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
+ * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
+ * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
+ * whole.
+ *
+ * a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
+ * License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * Or, alternatively,
+ *
+ * b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
+ * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
+ * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
+ * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
+ * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
+ * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+ * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
+ * conditions:
+ *
+ * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
+ * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
+ * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES
+ * OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
+ * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
+ * HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
+ * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+ * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
+ * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+
+#include "rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi"
+#include "cros-ec-sbs.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Google Jaq";
+ compatible = "google,veyron-jaq-rev5", "google,veyron-jaq-rev4",
+ "google,veyron-jaq-rev3", "google,veyron-jaq-rev2",
+ "google,veyron-jaq-rev1", "google,veyron-jaq",
+ "google,veyron", "rockchip,rk3288";
+
+ panel_regulator: panel-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ enable-active-high;
+ gpio = <&gpio7 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_enable_h>;
+ regulator-name = "panel_regulator";
+ vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+ };
+
+ vcc18_lcd: vcc18-lcd {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ enable-active-high;
+ gpio = <&gpio2 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&avdd_1v8_disp_en>;
+ regulator-name = "vcc18_lcd";
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ vin-supply = <&vcc18_wl>;
+ };
+
+ backlight_regulator: backlight-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ enable-active-high;
+ gpio = <&gpio2 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&bl_pwr_en>;
+ regulator-name = "backlight_regulator";
+ vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+ startup-delay-us = <15000>;
+ };
+};
+
+&rk808 {
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&pmic_int_l &dvs_1 &dvs_2>;
+ dvs-gpios = <&gpio7 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
+ <&gpio7 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+
+ regulators {
+ mic_vcc: LDO_REG2 {
+ regulator-name = "mic_vcc";
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-state-mem {
+ regulator-on-in-suspend;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+};
+
+&sdmmc {
+ disable-wp;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_cd_disabled &sdmmc_cd_gpio
+ &sdmmc_bus4>;
+};
+
+&vcc_5v {
+ enable-active-high;
+ gpio = <&gpio7 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&drv_5v>;
+};
+
+&vcc50_hdmi {
+ enable-active-high;
+ gpio = <&gpio5 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&vcc50_hdmi_en>;
+};
+
+&pinctrl {
+ backlight {
+ bl_pwr_en: bl_pwr_en {
+ rockchip,pins = <2 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ buck-5v {
+ drv_5v: drv-5v {
+ rockchip,pins = <7 21 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ edp {
+ edp_hpd: edp_hpd {
+ rockchip,pins = <7 11 RK_FUNC_2 &pcfg_pull_down>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ hdmi {
+ vcc50_hdmi_en: vcc50-hdmi-en {
+ rockchip,pins = <5 19 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ lcd {
+ lcd_enable_h: lcd-en {
+ rockchip,pins = <7 14 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+ };
+
+ avdd_1v8_disp_en: avdd-1v8-disp-en {
+ rockchip,pins = <2 13 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ pmic {
+ dvs_1: dvs-1 {
+ rockchip,pins = <7 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+ };
+
+ dvs_2: dvs-2 {
+ rockchip,pins = <7 15 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+ };
+ };
+};
--
2.5.0.276.gf5e568e


2015-08-18 18:44:48

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

This DTS file was submitted with non-upstream bindings. I happened
across this while reviewing the jaq DTS.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexandru M Stan <[email protected]>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
---
Tested on jaq, not minnie

arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
index 0e30bd6bf92b..6f619c154dc6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
@@ -128,12 +128,16 @@
regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
regulator-name = "vcc33_touch";
- regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
+ regulator-state-mem {
+ regulator-on-in-suspend;
+ };
};

vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 {
regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch";
- regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
+ regulator-state-mem {
+ regulator-on-in-suspend;
+ };
};
};
};
--
2.5.0.276.gf5e568e

2015-08-18 19:17:16

by Heiko Stuebner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

Hi Brian,


thanks for catching these oversights, but see below

Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 11:44:15 schrieb Brian Norris:
> This DTS file was submitted with non-upstream bindings. I happened
> across this while reviewing the jaq DTS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alexandru M Stan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
> ---
> Tested on jaq, not minnie
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts index
> 0e30bd6bf92b..6f619c154dc6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
> @@ -128,12 +128,16 @@
> regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> regulator-name = "vcc33_touch";
> - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
> + regulator-state-mem {
> + regulator-on-in-suspend;
> + };
> };
>
> vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 {
> regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch";
> - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
> + regulator-state-mem {
> + regulator-on-in-suspend;
> + };

wouldn't regulator-suspend-mem-disabled translate to regulator-off-in-suspend?
At least looks like it according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/592


Heiko

> };
> };
> };

2015-08-18 19:19:15

by Heiko Stuebner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: add veyron-jaq board

Hi Brian,


Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 11:44:14 schrieb Brian Norris:
> a.k.a. Haier Chromebook 11
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alexandru M Stan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts | 176
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts

missing binding documentation in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt (needs new entry above
Jerry)

>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> index 7805a6541a38..7a2c3c88ce9e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += \
> rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtb \
> rk3288-veyron-minnie.dtb \
> rk3288-veyron-pinky.dtb \
> + rk3288-veyron-jaq.dtb \
> rk3288-veyron-speedy.dtb

please sort alphabetically (in this case somewhere above jerry)


> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C24XX) += \
> s3c2416-smdk2416.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ea6130156216
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
> +/*
> + * Google Veyron Jaq Rev 1+ board device tree source
> + *
> + * Copyright 2015 Google, Inc
> + *
> + * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
> + * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
> + * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
> + * whole.
> + *
> + * a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
> + * License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * Or, alternatively,
> + *
> + * b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> + * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
> + * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
> + * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
> + * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
> + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
> + * conditions:
> + *
> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> + * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES
> + * OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
> + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
> + * HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
> + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
> + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi"
> +#include "cros-ec-sbs.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Google Jaq";
> + compatible = "google,veyron-jaq-rev5", "google,veyron-jaq-rev4",
> + "google,veyron-jaq-rev3", "google,veyron-jaq-rev2",
> + "google,veyron-jaq-rev1", "google,veyron-jaq",
> + "google,veyron", "rockchip,rk3288";
> +
> + panel_regulator: panel-regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + enable-active-high;
> + gpio = <&gpio7 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_enable_h>;
> + regulator-name = "panel_regulator";
> + vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc18_lcd: vcc18-lcd {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + enable-active-high;
> + gpio = <&gpio2 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&avdd_1v8_disp_en>;
> + regulator-name = "vcc18_lcd";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + vin-supply = <&vcc18_wl>;
> + };
> +
> + backlight_regulator: backlight-regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + enable-active-high;
> + gpio = <&gpio2 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&bl_pwr_en>;
> + regulator-name = "backlight_regulator";
> + vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
> + startup-delay-us = <15000>;
> + };

again, please alphabetically (backlight, panel, vcc*)


> +};
> +
> +&rk808 {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pmic_int_l &dvs_1 &dvs_2>;
> + dvs-gpios = <&gpio7 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
> + <&gpio7 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +
> + regulators {
> + mic_vcc: LDO_REG2 {
> + regulator-name = "mic_vcc";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-state-mem {
> + regulator-on-in-suspend;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&sdmmc {
> + disable-wp;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_cd_disabled &sdmmc_cd_gpio
> + &sdmmc_bus4>;
> +};
> +
> +&vcc_5v {
> + enable-active-high;
> + gpio = <&gpio7 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&drv_5v>;
> +};
> +
> +&vcc50_hdmi {
> + enable-active-high;
> + gpio = <&gpio5 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc50_hdmi_en>;
> +};
> +
> +&pinctrl {
> + backlight {
> + bl_pwr_en: bl_pwr_en {
> + rockchip,pins = <2 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + buck-5v {
> + drv_5v: drv-5v {
> + rockchip,pins = <7 21 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + edp {
> + edp_hpd: edp_hpd {
> + rockchip,pins = <7 11 RK_FUNC_2 &pcfg_pull_down>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + hdmi {
> + vcc50_hdmi_en: vcc50-hdmi-en {
> + rockchip,pins = <5 19 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + lcd {
> + lcd_enable_h: lcd-en {
> + rockchip,pins = <7 14 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> + };
> +
> + avdd_1v8_disp_en: avdd-1v8-disp-en {
> + rockchip,pins = <2 13 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + pmic {
> + dvs_1: dvs-1 {
> + rockchip,pins = <7 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
> + };
> +
> + dvs_2: dvs-2 {
> + rockchip,pins = <7 15 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
> + };
> + };
> +};

pinctrl can stay at the bottom. It may actually improve readability, if not
cluttering up the smaller other nodes above.


Thanks
Heiko

2015-08-18 20:30:22

by Javier Martinez Canillas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

Hello Heiko,

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
>
> thanks for catching these oversights, but see below
>
> Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 11:44:15 schrieb Brian Norris:
>> This DTS file was submitted with non-upstream bindings. I happened
>> across this while reviewing the jaq DTS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Alexandru M Stan <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Tested on jaq, not minnie
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts index
>> 0e30bd6bf92b..6f619c154dc6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
>> @@ -128,12 +128,16 @@
>> regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> regulator-name = "vcc33_touch";
>> - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
>> + regulator-state-mem {
>> + regulator-on-in-suspend;
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 {
>> regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch";
>> - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
>> + regulator-state-mem {
>> + regulator-on-in-suspend;
>> + };
>
> wouldn't regulator-suspend-mem-disabled translate to regulator-off-in-suspend?

Correct, the downstream regulator-suspend-mem-disabled is equivalent
to regulator-off-in-suspend in mainline.

> At least looks like it according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/592
>

I guess you meant https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/162 since it was
Chanwoo's and not Vincent's version that finally landed.

>
> Heiko
>

Best regards,
Javier

2015-08-18 20:38:11

by Javier Martinez Canillas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 {
>>> regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch";
>>> - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
>>> + regulator-state-mem {
>>> + regulator-on-in-suspend;
>>> + };
>>
>> wouldn't regulator-suspend-mem-disabled translate to regulator-off-in-suspend?
>
> Correct, the downstream regulator-suspend-mem-disabled is equivalent
> to regulator-off-in-suspend in mainline.
>
>> At least looks like it according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/592
>>
>
> I guess you meant https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/162 since it was
> Chanwoo's and not Vincent's version that finally landed.
>
>>

oh, now I got that you referenced Vincent's patch just to show the
regulator-suspend-mem-disabled property description.

Sorry for the noise then but yes you are right about the translation :-)

Best regards,
Javier

2015-08-18 22:48:38

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:17:06PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 11:44:15 schrieb Brian Norris:
> > This DTS file was submitted with non-upstream bindings. I happened
> > across this while reviewing the jaq DTS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Alexandru M Stan <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Tested on jaq, not minnie
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts index
> > 0e30bd6bf92b..6f619c154dc6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
> > @@ -128,12 +128,16 @@
> > regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > regulator-name = "vcc33_touch";
> > - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
> > + regulator-state-mem {
> > + regulator-on-in-suspend;
> > + };
> > };
> >
> > vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 {
> > regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch";
> > - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
> > + regulator-state-mem {
> > + regulator-on-in-suspend;
> > + };
>
> wouldn't regulator-suspend-mem-disabled translate to regulator-off-in-suspend?
> At least looks like it according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/592

You are right. My bad. Will fix. (Need to fix this in jaq too.)

Thanks,
Brian

2015-08-18 23:01:12

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: add veyron-jaq board

Thanks for the quick review.

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:19:05PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 11:44:14 schrieb Brian Norris:
> > a.k.a. Haier Chromebook 11
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Alexandru M Stan <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts | 176
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts
>
> missing binding documentation in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt (needs new entry above
> Jerry)

I don't know how I managed this, but I had already fixed this up in my
tree and amended the commit. I must have grabbed an old commit ref when
generating the patches... Sorry, will fix when sending v2.

> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> > index 7805a6541a38..7a2c3c88ce9e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> > @@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += \
> > rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtb \
> > rk3288-veyron-minnie.dtb \
> > rk3288-veyron-pinky.dtb \
> > + rk3288-veyron-jaq.dtb \
> > rk3288-veyron-speedy.dtb
>
> please sort alphabetically (in this case somewhere above jerry)

Will do.

> > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C24XX) += \
> > s3c2416-smdk2416.dtb
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..ea6130156216
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Google Veyron Jaq Rev 1+ board device tree source
> > + *
> > + * Copyright 2015 Google, Inc
> > + *
> > + * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
> > + * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
> > + * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
> > + * whole.
> > + *
> > + * a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
> > + * License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > + *
> > + * This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > + *
> > + * Or, alternatively,
> > + *
> > + * b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> > + * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
> > + * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
> > + * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
> > + * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
> > + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> > + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
> > + * conditions:
> > + *
> > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> > + * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> > + *
> > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> > + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES
> > + * OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
> > + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
> > + * HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
> > + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> > + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
> > + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include "rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi"
> > +#include "cros-ec-sbs.dtsi"
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + model = "Google Jaq";
> > + compatible = "google,veyron-jaq-rev5", "google,veyron-jaq-rev4",
> > + "google,veyron-jaq-rev3", "google,veyron-jaq-rev2",
> > + "google,veyron-jaq-rev1", "google,veyron-jaq",
> > + "google,veyron", "rockchip,rk3288";
> > +
> > + panel_regulator: panel-regulator {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + enable-active-high;
> > + gpio = <&gpio7 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_enable_h>;
> > + regulator-name = "panel_regulator";
> > + vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + vcc18_lcd: vcc18-lcd {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + enable-active-high;
> > + gpio = <&gpio2 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&avdd_1v8_disp_en>;
> > + regulator-name = "vcc18_lcd";
> > + regulator-always-on;
> > + regulator-boot-on;
> > + vin-supply = <&vcc18_wl>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + backlight_regulator: backlight-regulator {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + enable-active-high;
> > + gpio = <&gpio2 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&bl_pwr_en>;
> > + regulator-name = "backlight_regulator";
> > + vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
> > + startup-delay-us = <15000>;
> > + };
>
> again, please alphabetically (backlight, panel, vcc*)

Actually this one was somewhat intentional; I was trying to mirror the
jerry DTS, which has very similar (nearly identical) nodes in jaq.

But I can sort however you'd like it best.

> > +};
> > +
> > +&rk808 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&pmic_int_l &dvs_1 &dvs_2>;
> > + dvs-gpios = <&gpio7 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
> > + <&gpio7 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > +
> > + regulators {
> > + mic_vcc: LDO_REG2 {
> > + regulator-name = "mic_vcc";
> > + regulator-always-on;
> > + regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > + regulator-state-mem {
> > + regulator-on-in-suspend;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +&sdmmc {
> > + disable-wp;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_cd_disabled &sdmmc_cd_gpio
> > + &sdmmc_bus4>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&vcc_5v {
> > + enable-active-high;
> > + gpio = <&gpio7 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&drv_5v>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&vcc50_hdmi {
> > + enable-active-high;
> > + gpio = <&gpio5 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc50_hdmi_en>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&pinctrl {
> > + backlight {
> > + bl_pwr_en: bl_pwr_en {
> > + rockchip,pins = <2 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + buck-5v {
> > + drv_5v: drv-5v {
> > + rockchip,pins = <7 21 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + edp {
> > + edp_hpd: edp_hpd {
> > + rockchip,pins = <7 11 RK_FUNC_2 &pcfg_pull_down>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + hdmi {
> > + vcc50_hdmi_en: vcc50-hdmi-en {
> > + rockchip,pins = <5 19 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + lcd {
> > + lcd_enable_h: lcd-en {
> > + rockchip,pins = <7 14 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + avdd_1v8_disp_en: avdd-1v8-disp-en {
> > + rockchip,pins = <2 13 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + pmic {
> > + dvs_1: dvs-1 {
> > + rockchip,pins = <7 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + dvs_2: dvs-2 {
> > + rockchip,pins = <7 15 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
>
> pinctrl can stay at the bottom. It may actually improve readability, if not
> cluttering up the smaller other nodes above.

Ok.

Brian

2015-08-18 23:28:13

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 03:48:31PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:17:06PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 11:44:15 schrieb Brian Norris:
> > > This DTS file was submitted with non-upstream bindings. I happened
> > > across this while reviewing the jaq DTS.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Alexandru M Stan <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > Tested on jaq, not minnie
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts | 8 ++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
> > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts index
> > > 0e30bd6bf92b..6f619c154dc6 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
> > > @@ -128,12 +128,16 @@
> > > regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > > regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > > regulator-name = "vcc33_touch";
> > > - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
> > > + regulator-state-mem {
> > > + regulator-on-in-suspend;
> > > + };
> > > };
> > >
> > > vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 {
> > > regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch";
> > > - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
> > > + regulator-state-mem {
> > > + regulator-on-in-suspend;
> > > + };
> >
> > wouldn't regulator-suspend-mem-disabled translate to regulator-off-in-suspend?
> > At least looks like it according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/592
>
> You are right. My bad. Will fix. (Need to fix this in jaq too.)

Now that I'm looking a little closer, it seems like other existing DTS's
are broken too, then. Jerry looks like it was converted to the
regulator-state-mem node binding, but the conversion doesn't seem to
make sense when I compare the chromium DTS sources with the for-next
source I see in your tree.

In -next:

regulators {
mic_vcc: LDO_REG2 {
regulator-name = "mic_vcc";
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
regulator-state-mem {
regulator-on-in-suspend;
};
};
};

But chromium had:

regulators {
mic_vcc: LDO_REG2 {
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
regulator-name = "mic_vcc";
regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
};
};

So I guess I'll make the proper conversion for all the veyron variants I
see.

Brian

2015-08-19 06:19:58

by Heiko Stuebner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 16:28:06 schrieb Brian Norris:
> Now that I'm looking a little closer, it seems like other existing DTS's
> are broken too, then. Jerry looks like it was converted to the
> regulator-state-mem node binding, but the conversion doesn't seem to
> make sense when I compare the chromium DTS sources with the for-next
> source I see in your tree.
>
> In -next:
>
> regulators {
> mic_vcc: LDO_REG2 {
> regulator-name = "mic_vcc";
> regulator-always-on;
> regulator-boot-on;
> regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> regulator-state-mem {
> regulator-on-in-suspend;
> };
> };
> };
>
> But chromium had:
>
> regulators {
> mic_vcc: LDO_REG2 {
> regulator-always-on;
> regulator-boot-on;
> regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> regulator-name = "mic_vcc";
> regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
> };
> };
>
> So I guess I'll make the proper conversion for all the veyron variants I
> see.

great, just take into account the deep vs. shallow suspend modes :-)

The original regulator-state changes did happen when we had this suspend
instability (counter and gpioint stuff) and I did go with the values similar to
the rk3288-evb, as this was the only one resuming at all at the time. So I
guess I never looked to closesly what it did, as long as the system came out
of suspend sucessfully again :-)


Heiko

2015-08-27 19:30:54

by Doug Anderson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]> wrote:
> great, just take into account the deep vs. shallow suspend modes :-)

One note: do you think it would make sense to re-implement shallow
suspend as "standby"? I had a proof of concept doing that in
<https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/275123/>. One nice
advantage is that you "magically" get a second set of regulator states
for standby vs "mem".

If I understand correctly, the distinction between "standby" and "mem"
is not too clearly defined, so if we wanted to use it for this it
wouldn't be terrible?

-Doug

2015-08-27 20:51:32

by Heiko Stuebner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015, 12:30:51 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > great, just take into account the deep vs. shallow suspend modes :-)
>
> One note: do you think it would make sense to re-implement shallow
> suspend as "standby"? I had a proof of concept doing that in
> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/275123/>. One nice
> advantage is that you "magically" get a second set of regulator states
> for standby vs "mem".

Somewhere I've read something about keeping wifi associated to an ap during
suspend which might be a candidate for such a distinction?


> If I understand correctly, the distinction between "standby" and "mem"
> is not too clearly defined, so if we wanted to use it for this it
> wouldn't be terrible?

>From reading Documentation/power/states.txt it looks like the boot-cpu is
supposed to retain power in the suspend state. Although we also do not lose
"operating state" in our suspend I guess?

So using the shallow suspend as standby sounds interesting, for the time when
the deep suspend works too. If there is only one suspend state it
automatically becomes the "mem"-state it seems.


Heiko

2015-08-27 20:56:10

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:51:22PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015, 12:30:51 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> > If I understand correctly, the distinction between "standby" and "mem"
> > is not too clearly defined, so if we wanted to use it for this it
> > wouldn't be terrible?

I never understood many clear definitions here either, personally.

> From reading Documentation/power/states.txt it looks like the boot-cpu is
> supposed to retain power in the suspend state. Although we also do not lose
> "operating state" in our suspend I guess?
>
> So using the shallow suspend as standby sounds interesting, for the time when
> the deep suspend works too. If there is only one suspend state it
> automatically becomes the "mem"-state it seems.

It's not really "automatic", it's a product of this line:

static const struct platform_suspend_ops rk3288_suspend_ops = {
.enter = rk3288_suspend_enter,
.valid = suspend_valid_only_mem, <--- here
.prepare = rk3288_suspend_prepare,
.finish = rk3288_suspend_finish,
};

and the fact that we don't check the 'state' argument in
.enter/.prepare/.finish.

But still, I'm not sure it's productive to rename shallow until we support
deep.

Regards,
Brian