2012-08-06 14:54:26

by Peter Zijlstra

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "futex: Mark get_robust_list as deprecated"

On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:29 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> get_robust_list has at least two valid use cases.
> 1. checkpoint/restore in userspace
> 2. post mortem analysis

Shouldn't this then also be added as a comment somewhere near the
implementation to avoid a repeat of this deprecate / undeprecate cycle?


2012-08-06 14:57:28

by Richard Weinberger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "futex: Mark get_robust_list as deprecated"

Am 06.08.2012 16:53, schrieb Peter Zijlstra:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:29 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> get_robust_list has at least two valid use cases.
>> 1. checkpoint/restore in userspace
>> 2. post mortem analysis
>
> Shouldn't this then also be added as a comment somewhere near the
> implementation to avoid a repeat of this deprecate / undeprecate cycle?

Or someone submits a patch to glibc and the man-pages project to make this
system call official...

Thanks,
//richard


Attachments:
signature.asc (490.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature