2013-07-29 15:21:21

by Ezequiel Garcia

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove unneeded forward declaration

These forward declarations are no longer needed, and are probably
historical left-over.

Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>
---
drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
index 35c6b6d..10ea99a 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
@@ -4428,9 +4428,6 @@ static int mv_pci_device_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
#endif
#endif

-static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);
-static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
-
static int __init mv_init(void)
{
int rc = -ENODEV;
--
1.8.1.5


2013-07-29 15:21:26

by Ezequiel Garcia

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
the code.

Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>
---
drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 14 --------------
1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
index 10ea99a..3519987 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
@@ -553,10 +553,8 @@ struct mv_host_priv {
u32 irq_mask_offset;
u32 unmask_all_irqs;

-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
struct clk *clk;
struct clk **port_clks;
-#endif
/*
* These consistent DMA memory pools give us guaranteed
* alignment for hardware-accessed data structures,
@@ -4032,9 +4030,7 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct resource *res;
int n_ports = 0, irq = 0;
int rc;
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
int port;
-#endif

ata_print_version_once(&pdev->dev, DRV_VERSION);

@@ -4068,13 +4064,11 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

if (!host || !hpriv)
return -ENOMEM;
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
hpriv->port_clks = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
sizeof(struct clk *) * n_ports,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!hpriv->port_clks)
return -ENOMEM;
-#endif
host->private_data = hpriv;
hpriv->n_ports = n_ports;
hpriv->board_idx = chip_soc;
@@ -4084,7 +4078,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
resource_size(res));
hpriv->base -= SATAHC0_REG_BASE;

-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
hpriv->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(hpriv->clk))
dev_notice(&pdev->dev, "cannot get optional clkdev\n");
@@ -4098,7 +4091,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->port_clks[port]))
clk_prepare_enable(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
}
-#endif

/*
* (Re-)program MBUS remapping windows if we are asked to.
@@ -4124,7 +4116,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;

err:
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->clk)) {
clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->clk);
clk_put(hpriv->clk);
@@ -4135,7 +4126,6 @@ err:
clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
}
}
-#endif

return rc;
}
@@ -4151,13 +4141,10 @@ err:
static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct ata_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
struct mv_host_priv *hpriv = host->private_data;
int port;
-#endif
ata_host_detach(host);

-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->clk)) {
clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->clk);
clk_put(hpriv->clk);
@@ -4168,7 +4155,6 @@ static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
}
}
-#endif
return 0;
}

--
1.8.1.5

2013-07-29 15:59:23

by Tejun Heo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove unneeded forward declaration

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:21PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> These forward declarations are no longer needed, and are probably
> historical left-over.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>

Applied to libata/for-3.12.

Thanks.

--
tejun

2013-07-29 16:00:23

by Tejun Heo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
> into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
> The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
> but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
> the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>

Can you please add a comment in the hpriv definition explaining what
that clk is for and how it's optional and becomes noops when not
needed?

Thanks.

--
tejun

2013-07-29 16:51:00

by Ezequiel Garcia

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:00:16PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
> > into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
> > The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
> > but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
> > the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>
>
> Can you please add a comment in the hpriv definition explaining what
> that clk is for and how it's optional and becomes noops when not
> needed?
>

Sure.

Thanks for the feedback,
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com

2013-07-29 19:06:06

by Andrew Lunn

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
> into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
> The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
> but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
> the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>

Hi Ezequiel

What architectures did you compile this for? PowerPC and x86 as well
as ARM? I _think_ this driver is also used there, and i _think_
without some #ifdef, it failed to build. But maybe since then, the
common clock is now available on all architectures?

Andrew


> ---
> drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 14 --------------
> 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> index 10ea99a..3519987 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> @@ -553,10 +553,8 @@ struct mv_host_priv {
> u32 irq_mask_offset;
> u32 unmask_all_irqs;
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
> struct clk *clk;
> struct clk **port_clks;
> -#endif
> /*
> * These consistent DMA memory pools give us guaranteed
> * alignment for hardware-accessed data structures,
> @@ -4032,9 +4030,7 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *res;
> int n_ports = 0, irq = 0;
> int rc;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
> int port;
> -#endif
>
> ata_print_version_once(&pdev->dev, DRV_VERSION);
>
> @@ -4068,13 +4064,11 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (!host || !hpriv)
> return -ENOMEM;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
> hpriv->port_clks = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> sizeof(struct clk *) * n_ports,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!hpriv->port_clks)
> return -ENOMEM;
> -#endif
> host->private_data = hpriv;
> hpriv->n_ports = n_ports;
> hpriv->board_idx = chip_soc;
> @@ -4084,7 +4078,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> resource_size(res));
> hpriv->base -= SATAHC0_REG_BASE;
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
> hpriv->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(hpriv->clk))
> dev_notice(&pdev->dev, "cannot get optional clkdev\n");
> @@ -4098,7 +4091,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->port_clks[port]))
> clk_prepare_enable(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
> }
> -#endif
>
> /*
> * (Re-)program MBUS remapping windows if we are asked to.
> @@ -4124,7 +4116,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
>
> err:
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
> if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->clk)) {
> clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->clk);
> clk_put(hpriv->clk);
> @@ -4135,7 +4126,6 @@ err:
> clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
> }
> }
> -#endif
>
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -4151,13 +4141,10 @@ err:
> static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct ata_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
> struct mv_host_priv *hpriv = host->private_data;
> int port;
> -#endif
> ata_host_detach(host);
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
> if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->clk)) {
> clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->clk);
> clk_put(hpriv->clk);
> @@ -4168,7 +4155,6 @@ static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
> }
> }
> -#endif
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>

2013-07-29 19:44:49

by Ezequiel Garcia

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

Hi Andrew,

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 09:04:31PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
> > into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
> > The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
> > but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
> > the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>
>
> What architectures did you compile this for? PowerPC and x86 as well
> as ARM? I _think_ this driver is also used there, and i _think_
> without some #ifdef, it failed to build. But maybe since then, the
> common clock is now available on all architectures?
>

Using COMPILE_TEST=y, I've compiled with a working ARM config,
as well as with a MMU-less ARM (with COMMON_CLK=n).

And now that you mention x86, I've compiled it with an x86 config
(with COMMON_CLK=n).

I'm not sure this particular change is architecture dependent (at least
nowadays), since by looking at include/linux/clk.h it seems pretty
straightforward that all the operations are no-ops if HAVE_CLK=n.

Am I missing something?
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com