Interface #5 of 19d2:1270 is a net interface which has been submitted to the
qmi_wwan driver so consequently remove it from the option driver.
Signed-off-by: Raymond Wanyoike <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
index 5c86f57..216d20a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
@@ -1362,7 +1362,8 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option_ids[] = {
{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1267, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1268, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1269, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
- { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1270, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
+ { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1270, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff),
+ .driver_info = (kernel_ulong_t)&net_intf5_blacklist },
{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1271, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1272, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1273, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
--
1.8.5.4
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 11:59:46AM +0300, Raymond Wanyoike wrote:
> Interface #5 of 19d2:1270 is a net interface which has been submitted to the
> qmi_wwan driver so consequently remove it from the option driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raymond Wanyoike <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Why is this patch a "RFC"?
Sorry, first time, meant to be "PATCH".
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 11:59:46AM +0300, Raymond Wanyoike wrote:
>> Interface #5 of 19d2:1270 is a net interface which has been submitted to the
>> qmi_wwan driver so consequently remove it from the option driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raymond Wanyoike <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Why is this patch a "RFC"?
--
Raymond