From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <[email protected]>
this patch fixes following sparse warning:
enic_ethtool.c:95:6: warning: symbol 'enic_intr_coal_set_rx' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <[email protected]>
---
Found this issue on linux-next (gcc version 4.8.2,
sparse version 0.4.5-rc1)and applies on top linux-next.
drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_ethtool.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_ethtool.c
index 0c396c1..28d9ca6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_ethtool.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static const unsigned int enic_n_tx_stats = ARRAY_SIZE(enic_tx_stats);
static const unsigned int enic_n_rx_stats = ARRAY_SIZE(enic_rx_stats);
static const unsigned int enic_n_gen_stats = ARRAY_SIZE(enic_gen_stats);
-void enic_intr_coal_set_rx(struct enic *enic, u32 timer)
+static void enic_intr_coal_set_rx(struct enic *enic, u32 timer)
{
int i;
int intr;
--
1.9.1
From: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:29:55 +0000
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <[email protected]>
>
> this patch fixes following sparse warning:
>
> enic_ethtool.c:95:6: warning: symbol 'enic_intr_coal_set_rx' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Applied.