Fix typo in checking error value of cap_get_proc(): cap -> caps
Signed-off-by: Sergei Zviagintsev <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kdbus/kdbus-util.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kdbus/kdbus-util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kdbus/kdbus-util.c
index 1e267d585a14..a3e49b04f3a7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kdbus/kdbus-util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kdbus/kdbus-util.c
@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@ int test_is_capable(int cap, ...)
cap_t caps;
caps = cap_get_proc();
- if (!cap) {
+ if (!caps) {
ret = -errno;
kdbus_printf("error cap_get_proc(): %d (%m)\n", ret);
return ret;
--
1.8.3.1
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 05:18:13PM +0300, Sergei Zviagintsev wrote:
> Fix typo in checking error value of cap_get_proc(): cap -> caps
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Zviagintsev <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kdbus/kdbus-util.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
You sent 5 patches, yet no hints as to what order they should be applied
in :(
Please resend in a patch series that is properly threaded so we can
handle this correctly.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 07:37:20AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> You sent 5 patches, yet no hints as to what order they should be applied
> in :(
>
> Please resend in a patch series that is properly threaded so we can
> handle this correctly.
Thank you for feedback! I've resent series threaded:
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/[email protected]
It was unclear for me whether to use threaded layout and whether not,
but now it seems that I got it. Though those applied fine in any order
and had no chances to piss of a kernel maintainer :)