2018-04-10 08:19:02

by Jia-Ju Bai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: armada_thermal: Replace mdelay with msleep in armada375_init_sensor

armada375_init_sensor() is never called in atomic context.

armada375_init_sensor() is set as ".init_sensor" in
struct armada_thermal_data.
".init_sensor" is called armada_thermal_probe().
armada_thermal_probe() is set as ".probe" in struct platform_driver.
This function is not called in atomic context.

Despite never getting called from atomic context, armada375_init_sensor()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with msleep() to
avoid busy waiting.

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
---
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
index ae75328..0825a7a 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
@@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static void armada375_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
reg &= ~A375_HW_RESETn;

writel(reg, priv->control + 4);
- mdelay(20);
+ msleep(20);

reg |= A375_HW_RESETn;
writel(reg, priv->control + 4);
- mdelay(50);
+ msleep(50);
}

static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
--
1.9.1



2018-04-27 02:14:02

by Eduardo Valentin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: armada_thermal: Replace mdelay with msleep in armada375_init_sensor

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:13:16PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> armada375_init_sensor() is never called in atomic context.
>
> armada375_init_sensor() is set as ".init_sensor" in
> struct armada_thermal_data.
> ".init_sensor" is called armada_thermal_probe().
> armada_thermal_probe() is set as ".probe" in struct platform_driver.
> This function is not called in atomic context.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context, armada375_init_sensor()
> calls mdelay() to busily wait.
> This is not necessary and can be replaced with msleep() to
> avoid busy waiting.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> And I also manually check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> index ae75328..0825a7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static void armada375_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
> reg &= ~A375_HW_RESETn;
>
> writel(reg, priv->control + 4);
> - mdelay(20);
> + msleep(20);
>
> reg |= A375_HW_RESETn;
> writel(reg, priv->control + 4);
> - mdelay(50);
> + msleep(50);

Already done:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c#n144

> }
>
> static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
> --
> 1.9.1
>