merge all the reset numbers in one head file.
Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <[email protected]>
---
include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d73a4ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Mediatek Inc.
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
+#define _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
+
+#define MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 11
+#define MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 19
+
+#endif
--
1.8.1.1.dirty
Hi Crystal,
On 29/07/2020 08:30, Crystal Guo wrote:
> merge all the reset numbers in one head file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d73a4ba
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Mediatek Inc.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> +
> +#define MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 11
> +#define MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 19
Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. We want to have all resets in one file
and do not want to have the resets for the watchdog in a different file. That
means I don't thin your patch is correct and the effort should be abandoned.
Regards,
Matthias
On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 15:42 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> Hi Crystal,
>
> On 29/07/2020 08:30, Crystal Guo wrote:
> > merge all the reset numbers in one head file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d73a4ba
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Mediatek Inc.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> > +#define _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> > +
> > +#define MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 11
> > +#define MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 19
>
> Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. We want to have all resets in one file
> and do not want to have the resets for the watchdog in a different file. That
> means I don't thin your patch is correct and the effort should be abandoned.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
Do you mean to keep the current way unchanged? For example, with a new
SOC 8192, should add a new head file mt8192_resets.h for the resets
numbers.
On 29/07/2020 10:11, Crystal Guo wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 15:42 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> Hi Crystal,
>>
>> On 29/07/2020 08:30, Crystal Guo wrote:
>>> merge all the reset numbers in one head file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..d73a4ba
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Mediatek Inc.
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
>>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
>>> +
>>> +#define MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 11
>>> +#define MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 19
>>
>> Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. We want to have all resets in one file
>> and do not want to have the resets for the watchdog in a different file. That
>> means I don't thin your patch is correct and the effort should be abandoned.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>
> Do you mean to keep the current way unchanged? For example, with a new
> SOC 8192, should add a new head file mt8192_resets.h for the resets
> numbers.
>
Exactly.
Regards,
Matthias
On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 16:15 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 29/07/2020 10:11, Crystal Guo wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 15:42 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >> Hi Crystal,
> >>
> >> On 29/07/2020 08:30, Crystal Guo wrote:
> >>> merge all the reset numbers in one head file.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <[email protected]>
> >>> ---
> >>> include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..d73a4ba
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Mediatek Inc.
> >>> + *
> >>> + */
> >>> +
> >>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> >>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> >>> +
> >>> +#define MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 11
> >>> +#define MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 19
> >>
> >> Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. We want to have all resets in one file
> >> and do not want to have the resets for the watchdog in a different file. That
> >> means I don't thin your patch is correct and the effort should be abandoned.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> >
> > Do you mean to keep the current way unchanged? For example, with a new
> > SOC 8192, should add a new head file mt8192_resets.h for the resets
> > numbers.
> >
>
> Exactly.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
OK, but the dt-binding mtk-wdt.txt still need to update, please help me
to review, many thanks~