2021-11-24 21:07:27

by Nicolas Frattaroli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: rockchip: i2s_tdm: Dup static DAI template

Previously, the DAI template was used directly, which lead to
fun bugs such as "why is my channels_max changing?" when one
instantiated more than one i2s_tdm IP block in a device tree.

This change makes it so that we instead duplicate the template
struct, and then use that.

Fixes: 081068fd6414 ("ASoC: rockchip: add support for i2s-tdm controller")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_i2s_tdm.c | 42 +++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_i2s_tdm.c b/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_i2s_tdm.c
index 17b9b287853a..e9ddbbf4563e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_i2s_tdm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_i2s_tdm.c
@@ -1312,22 +1312,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id rockchip_i2s_tdm_match[] = {

static struct snd_soc_dai_driver i2s_tdm_dai = {
.probe = rockchip_i2s_tdm_dai_probe,
- .playback = {
- .stream_name = "Playback",
- },
- .capture = {
- .stream_name = "Capture",
- },
.ops = &rockchip_i2s_tdm_dai_ops,
};

-static void rockchip_i2s_tdm_init_dai(struct rk_i2s_tdm_dev *i2s_tdm)
+static int rockchip_i2s_tdm_init_dai(struct rk_i2s_tdm_dev *i2s_tdm)
{
+ struct snd_soc_dai_driver *dai;
struct property *dma_names;
const char *dma_name;
u64 formats = (SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S8 | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE |
- SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S20_3LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE |
- SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S32_LE);
+ SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S20_3LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE |
+ SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S32_LE);
struct device_node *node = i2s_tdm->dev->of_node;

of_property_for_each_string(node, "dma-names", dma_names, dma_name) {
@@ -1337,19 +1332,28 @@ static void rockchip_i2s_tdm_init_dai(struct rk_i2s_tdm_dev *i2s_tdm)
i2s_tdm->has_capture = true;
}

+ dai = devm_kmemdup(i2s_tdm->dev, &i2s_tdm_dai,
+ sizeof(*dai), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dai)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
if (i2s_tdm->has_playback) {
- i2s_tdm_dai.playback.channels_min = 2;
- i2s_tdm_dai.playback.channels_max = 8;
- i2s_tdm_dai.playback.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000;
- i2s_tdm_dai.playback.formats = formats;
+ dai->playback.stream_name = "Playback";
+ dai->playback.channels_min = 2;
+ dai->playback.channels_max = 8;
+ dai->playback.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000;
+ dai->playback.formats = formats;
}

if (i2s_tdm->has_capture) {
- i2s_tdm_dai.capture.channels_min = 2;
- i2s_tdm_dai.capture.channels_max = 8;
- i2s_tdm_dai.capture.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000;
- i2s_tdm_dai.capture.formats = formats;
+ dai->capture.stream_name = "Capture";
+ dai->capture.channels_min = 2;
+ dai->capture.channels_max = 8;
+ dai->capture.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000;
+ dai->capture.formats = formats;
}
+
+ return 0;
}

static int rockchip_i2s_tdm_path_check(struct rk_i2s_tdm_dev *i2s_tdm,
@@ -1541,7 +1545,9 @@ static int rockchip_i2s_tdm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
spin_lock_init(&i2s_tdm->lock);
i2s_tdm->soc_data = (struct rk_i2s_soc_data *)of_id->data;

- rockchip_i2s_tdm_init_dai(i2s_tdm);
+ ret = rockchip_i2s_tdm_init_dai(i2s_tdm);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;

i2s_tdm->frame_width = 64;

--
2.34.0



2021-12-01 18:32:03

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rockchip: i2s_tdm: Dup static DAI template

On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:06:55 +0100, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> Previously, the DAI template was used directly, which lead to
> fun bugs such as "why is my channels_max changing?" when one
> instantiated more than one i2s_tdm IP block in a device tree.
>
> This change makes it so that we instead duplicate the template
> struct, and then use that.
>
> [...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-linus

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: rockchip: i2s_tdm: Dup static DAI template
commit: 53689f7f91a2ab0079422e1d1b6e096cf68d58f4

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark