2022-02-09 12:57:52

by 王擎

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] power: supply: da9150: use div64_u64() instead of do_div()

From: Wang Qing <[email protected]>

do_div() does a 64-by-32 division.
When the divisor is u64, do_div() truncates it to 32 bits, this means it
can test non-zero and be truncated to zero for division.

fix do_div.cocci warning:
do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.

Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <[email protected]>
---
drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
index 6e36782..896491a
--- a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int da9150_fg_current_avg(struct da9150_fg *fg,
div = (u64) (sd_gain * shunt_val * 65536ULL);
do_div(div, 1000000);
res = (u64) (iavg * 1000000ULL);
- do_div(res, div);
+ div64_u64(res, div);

val->intval = (int) res;

--
2.7.4



2022-02-12 05:41:37

by Sebastian Reichel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: da9150: use div64_u64() instead of do_div()

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:53:08PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 11/02/2022 ? 21:50, Sebastian Reichel a ?crit?:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:39:46AM -0800, Qing Wang wrote:
> > > From: Wang Qing <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > do_div() does a 64-by-32 division.
> > > When the divisor is u64, do_div() truncates it to 32 bits, this means it
> > > can test non-zero and be truncated to zero for division.
> > >
> > > fix do_div.cocci warning:
> > > do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> >
> > Thanks, queued.
>
> All these patches are broken and should be NACKed, fixed or reverted if
> applied.
>
> See [1].
>
> CJ
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/[email protected]/

Oops, thanks for the hint. Patch dropped. I actually missed the
do_div(div, 1000000) during my review (probably should go sleeping),
so div should be within safe range in the second do_div() anyways.

-- Sebastian

>
> >
> > -- Sebastian
> >
> > > drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
> > > index 6e36782..896491a
> > > --- a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
> > > @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int da9150_fg_current_avg(struct da9150_fg *fg,
> > > div = (u64) (sd_gain * shunt_val * 65536ULL);
> > > do_div(div, 1000000);
> > > res = (u64) (iavg * 1000000ULL);
> > > - do_div(res, div);
> > > + div64_u64(res, div);
> > > val->intval = (int) res;
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
>


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.76 kB)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments

2022-02-12 14:36:38

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: da9150: use div64_u64() instead of do_div()

Le 11/02/2022 à 21:50, Sebastian Reichel a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:39:46AM -0800, Qing Wang wrote:
>> From: Wang Qing <[email protected]>
>>
>> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division.
>> When the divisor is u64, do_div() truncates it to 32 bits, this means it
>> can test non-zero and be truncated to zero for division.
>>
>> fix do_div.cocci warning:
>> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> Thanks, queued.

All these patches are broken and should be NACKed, fixed or reverted if
applied.

See [1].

CJ

[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/[email protected]/

>
> -- Sebastian
>
>> drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
>> index 6e36782..896491a
>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
>> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int da9150_fg_current_avg(struct da9150_fg *fg,
>> div = (u64) (sd_gain * shunt_val * 65536ULL);
>> do_div(div, 1000000);
>> res = (u64) (iavg * 1000000ULL);
>> - do_div(res, div);
>> + div64_u64(res, div);
>>
>> val->intval = (int) res;
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>

2022-02-14 18:53:57

by Sebastian Reichel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: da9150: use div64_u64() instead of do_div()

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:39:46AM -0800, Qing Wang wrote:
> From: Wang Qing <[email protected]>
>
> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division.
> When the divisor is u64, do_div() truncates it to 32 bits, this means it
> can test non-zero and be truncated to zero for division.
>
> fix do_div.cocci warning:
> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <[email protected]>
> ---

Thanks, queued.

-- Sebastian

> drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
> index 6e36782..896491a
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int da9150_fg_current_avg(struct da9150_fg *fg,
> div = (u64) (sd_gain * shunt_val * 65536ULL);
> do_div(div, 1000000);
> res = (u64) (iavg * 1000000ULL);
> - do_div(res, div);
> + div64_u64(res, div);
>
> val->intval = (int) res;
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.06 kB)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments