The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
("probe_new") can be used instead.
This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/codecs/pcm3060-i2c.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/pcm3060-i2c.c b/sound/soc/codecs/pcm3060-i2c.c
index abcdeb922201..2388098eeca3 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/pcm3060-i2c.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/pcm3060-i2c.c
@@ -10,8 +10,7 @@
#include "pcm3060.h"
-static int pcm3060_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
- const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int pcm3060_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
{
struct pcm3060_priv *priv;
@@ -50,7 +49,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver pcm3060_i2c_driver = {
#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
},
.id_table = pcm3060_i2c_id,
- .probe = pcm3060_i2c_probe,
+ .probe_new = pcm3060_i2c_probe,
};
module_i2c_driver(pcm3060_i2c_driver);
--
2.27.0
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:36:18 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> ("probe_new") can be used instead.
>
> This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: pcm3060: use simple i2c probe function
commit: 5a07a41fed93e7c7f7ba5ac710c2ccdf3a168bee
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark