In mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id, skc_local is the same as msk_local, so it
always return 0. Thus every subflow's local_id is 0. It's incorrect.
This patch fixed this issue.
Also, we need to ignore the zero address here, like 0.0.0.0 in IPv4. When
we use the zero address as a local address, it means that we can use any
one of the local addresses. The zero address is not a new address, we don't
need to add it to PM, so this patch added a new function address_zero to
check whether an address is the zero address, if it is, we ignore this
address.
Reviewed-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 2c208d2e65cd..dc2c57860d2d 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -66,6 +66,19 @@ static bool addresses_equal(const struct mptcp_addr_info *a,
return a->port == b->port;
}
+static bool address_zero(const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr)
+{
+ struct mptcp_addr_info zero;
+
+ memset(&zero, 0, sizeof(zero));
+ zero.family = addr->family;
+
+ if (addresses_equal(addr, &zero, false))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static void local_address(const struct sock_common *skc,
struct mptcp_addr_info *addr)
{
@@ -323,10 +336,13 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock_common *skc)
* addr
*/
local_address((struct sock_common *)msk, &msk_local);
- local_address((struct sock_common *)msk, &skc_local);
+ local_address((struct sock_common *)skc, &skc_local);
if (addresses_equal(&msk_local, &skc_local, false))
return 0;
+ if (address_zero(&skc_local))
+ return 0;
+
pernet = net_generic(sock_net((struct sock *)msk), pm_nl_pernet_id);
rcu_read_lock();
--
2.17.1
This patch set the init remote_id to zero, otherwise it will be a random
number.
Then it added the missing subflow's remote_id setting code both in
__mptcp_subflow_connect and in subflow_ulp_clone.
Reviewed-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 2 +-
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index dc2c57860d2d..255695221309 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
{
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *local;
- struct mptcp_addr_info remote;
+ struct mptcp_addr_info remote = { 0 };
struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet;
pernet = net_generic(sock_net((struct sock *)msk), pm_nl_pernet_id);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index e8cac2655c82..9ead43f79023 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -1063,6 +1063,7 @@ int __mptcp_subflow_connect(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
struct sockaddr_storage addr;
+ int remote_id = remote->id;
int local_id = loc->id;
struct socket *sf;
struct sock *ssk;
@@ -1107,10 +1108,11 @@ int __mptcp_subflow_connect(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
goto failed;
mptcp_crypto_key_sha(subflow->remote_key, &remote_token, NULL);
- pr_debug("msk=%p remote_token=%u local_id=%d", msk, remote_token,
- local_id);
+ pr_debug("msk=%p remote_token=%u local_id=%d remote_id=%d", msk,
+ remote_token, local_id, remote_id);
subflow->remote_token = remote_token;
subflow->local_id = local_id;
+ subflow->remote_id = remote_id;
subflow->request_join = 1;
subflow->request_bkup = 1;
mptcp_info2sockaddr(remote, &addr);
@@ -1347,6 +1349,7 @@ static void subflow_ulp_clone(const struct request_sock *req,
new_ctx->fully_established = 1;
new_ctx->backup = subflow_req->backup;
new_ctx->local_id = subflow_req->local_id;
+ new_ctx->remote_id = subflow_req->remote_id;
new_ctx->token = subflow_req->token;
new_ctx->thmac = subflow_req->thmac;
}
--
2.17.1
Hi Geliang,
On 07/09/2020 12:29, Geliang Tang wrote:
> In mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id, skc_local is the same as msk_local, so it
> always return 0. Thus every subflow's local_id is 0. It's incorrect.
>
> This patch fixed this issue.
>
> Also, we need to ignore the zero address here, like 0.0.0.0 in IPv4. When
> we use the zero address as a local address, it means that we can use any
> one of the local addresses. The zero address is not a new address, we don't
> need to add it to PM, so this patch added a new function address_zero to
> check whether an address is the zero address, if it is, we ignore this
> address.
Thank you for this patch!
As any patch for -net, may you add a "Fixes:" tag please?
(Also, I don't know if it is normal but I didn't receive the cover-letter)
(...)
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> index 2c208d2e65cd..dc2c57860d2d 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,19 @@ static bool addresses_equal(const struct mptcp_addr_info *a,
> return a->port == b->port;
> }
>
> +static bool address_zero(const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr)
> +{
> + struct mptcp_addr_info zero;
> +
> + memset(&zero, 0, sizeof(zero));
> + zero.family = addr->family;
> +
> + if (addresses_equal(addr, &zero, false))
Small detail: here you can simply have:
return addresses_equal(addr, &zero, false);
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
http://www.tessares.net
Hi Geliang,
On 07/09/2020 12:29, Geliang Tang wrote:
> This patch set the init remote_id to zero, otherwise it will be a random
> number.
>
> Then it added the missing subflow's remote_id setting code both in
> __mptcp_subflow_connect and in subflow_ulp_clone.
Thank you for this other patch!
Here as well, may you add a "Fixes:" tag please?
(...)
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> index dc2c57860d2d..255695221309 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> {
> struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
> struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *local;
> - struct mptcp_addr_info remote;
> + struct mptcp_addr_info remote = { 0 };
To respect the "reversed Xmas tree" way to declare variables, may you
move this line up to be the first one in the list please?
The rest looks good to me, thank you!
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
http://www.tessares.net