2002-10-02 03:43:00

by Brian Litzinger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: swsusp 2.4.18 vs 2.5.40

Brian Litzinger writes:

>[swsusp in 2.4.18 works pretty well but...]

Pavel Machek <[email protected]> writes:

>Yep, swsusp is not really meant to work in 2.4.X. Get latest 2.5.X...
>and add IDE patches so it does not eat your disk...

Ok, I've compiled and tried 2.5.40.

Zip. Nada. swsusp doesn't show up at all. If I compile with SMP
turned on I get a message about swsusp being incompatible with
SMP. Running UP it doesn't show up in the boot log, though it
looks to be compiled.

It also doesn't show in the SysRq help list.

echo'ing things to /proc/acpi/sleep does nothing.

--
Brian Litzinger


2002-10-08 20:11:31

by Pavel Machek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: swsusp 2.4.18 vs 2.5.40

HI!

> >Yep, swsusp is not really meant to work in 2.4.X. Get latest 2.5.X...
> >and add IDE patches so it does not eat your disk...
>
> Ok, I've compiled and tried 2.5.40.
>
> Zip. Nada. swsusp doesn't show up at all. If I compile with SMP
> turned on I get a message about swsusp being incompatible with
> SMP. Running UP it doesn't show up in the boot log, though it
> looks to be compiled.
>
> It also doesn't show in the SysRq help list.
>
> echo'ing things to /proc/acpi/sleep does nothing.

Bad test in acpi/sleep.c; then IDE fix is needed and andrew's mm patch
to really free memory.
Pavel
--
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.