Hi,
Here's a changeset from Christoph Hellwig that removes some unneeded
code from the kernel core. This was leftover from before devfs became
part of the main kernel tree, and was trying to do some naming fixups in
kernelspace. If anyone still has machines using these names, their
startup scripts should be modified to use the "standard" devfs names.
Please pull from: http://linuxusb.bkbits.net/devfs-2.5
thanks,
greg k-h
init/do_mounts.c | 58 -------------------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 58 deletions(-)
-----
[email protected], 2002-10-03 13:58:19-07:00, [email protected]
[PATCH] Remove some more devfs crap
Translation code for old devfs names that _never_ were in mainline
for root=.
init/do_mounts.c | 58 -------------------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 58 deletions(-)
------
And here's the patch for those who want to see it.
# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
# ChangeSet 1.682 -> 1.683
# init/do_mounts.c 1.23 -> 1.24
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 02/10/03 [email protected] 1.683
# [PATCH] Remove some more devfs crap
#
# Translation code for old devfs names that _never_ were in mainline
# for root=.
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
--- a/init/do_mounts.c Thu Oct 3 14:31:22 2002
+++ b/init/do_mounts.c Thu Oct 3 14:31:22 2002
@@ -642,63 +642,6 @@
return rd_load_image("/dev/root");
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEVFS_FS
-
-static void __init convert_name(char *prefix, char *name, char *p, int part)
-{
- int host, bus, target, lun;
- char dest[64];
- char src[64];
- char *base = p - 1;
-
- /* Decode "c#b#t#u#" */
- if (*p++ != 'c')
- return;
- host = simple_strtol(p, &p, 10);
- if (*p++ != 'b')
- return;
- bus = simple_strtol(p, &p, 10);
- if (*p++ != 't')
- return;
- target = simple_strtol(p, &p, 10);
- if (*p++ != 'u')
- return;
- lun = simple_strtol(p, &p, 10);
- if (!part)
- sprintf(dest, "%s/host%d/bus%d/target%d/lun%d",
- prefix, host, bus, target, lun);
- else if (*p++ == 'p')
- sprintf(dest, "%s/host%d/bus%d/target%d/lun%d/part%s",
- prefix, host, bus, target, lun, p);
- else
- sprintf(dest, "%s/host%d/bus%d/target%d/lun%d/disc",
- prefix, host, bus, target, lun);
- *base = '\0';
- sprintf(src, "/dev/%s", name);
- sys_mkdir(src, 0755);
- *base = '/';
- sprintf(src, "/dev/%s", name);
- sys_symlink(dest, src);
-}
-
-static void __init devfs_make_root(char *name)
-{
-
- if (!strncmp(name, "sd/", 3))
- convert_name("../scsi", name, name+3, 1);
- else if (!strncmp(name, "sr/", 3))
- convert_name("../scsi", name, name+3, 0);
- else if (!strncmp(name, "ide/hd/", 7))
- convert_name("..", name, name + 7, 1);
- else if (!strncmp(name, "ide/cd/", 7))
- convert_name("..", name, name + 7, 0);
-}
-#else
-static void __init devfs_make_root(char *name)
-{
-}
-#endif
-
static void __init mount_root(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_ROOT_NFS
@@ -713,7 +656,6 @@
ROOT_DEV = Root_FD0;
}
#endif
- devfs_make_root(root_device_name);
create_dev("/dev/root", ROOT_DEV, root_device_name);
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_FD
if (MAJOR(ROOT_DEV) == FLOPPY_MAJOR) {
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:17:34AM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
> Greg KH writes:
> > Here's a changeset from Christoph Hellwig that removes some unneeded
> > code from the kernel core. This was leftover from before devfs became
> > part of the main kernel tree, and was trying to do some naming fixups in
> > kernelspace. If anyone still has machines using these names, their
> > startup scripts should be modified to use the "standard" devfs names.
> >
> > Please pull from: http://linuxusb.bkbits.net/devfs-2.5
>
> NO! Dammit, you'll break everyone who is using these compact names to
> mount the root FS. Look more closely at the code you're trying to
> remove, and you'll see it's *not* used to avoid work in startup
> scripts. It's only used to create the devfs entry for the root FS.
This is 2.5 and those names were never in mainline. Use your new
devfs names or plain linux names or just hex numbers. Linux is
not a place were we keep junk around.
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:27:07AM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > Those names *were* in mainline. They've been there all through 2.4.x.
> > It's a useful feature that is *still* being used. Change this and lots
> > of people will get a panic at boot because there root FS is "missing".
>
> They have never been the devfs names in_any_ kernel. Linus made you
> change to saner names before merging devfs (saner code would also
> have been a good idea, btw..). Anyway, 2.5 is going to initramfs,
> so feel free to put devfsd into your initramfs.
The convenience names for the root FS *have* been in the kernel since
before 2.4.x. I agree with the initramfs approach: that's been my plan
for handling the rootFS compatibility names (put a mini devfsd into
initramfs). But until all the infrastructure for that is ready, you
can't just go around breaking features people rely on. Especially
where there is no benefit to breaking it.
If you really feel strongly about it, and don't want to wait for
devfsd to be added to initramfs, by all means move the current code
(or the moral equivalent) to initramfs. But you'll have to wait for
initramfs to be available and for it to be the default.
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: [email protected]
Current: [email protected]
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:17:34AM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > Greg KH writes:
> > > Here's a changeset from Christoph Hellwig that removes some unneeded
> > > code from the kernel core. This was leftover from before devfs became
> > > part of the main kernel tree, and was trying to do some naming fixups in
> > > kernelspace. If anyone still has machines using these names, their
> > > startup scripts should be modified to use the "standard" devfs names.
> > >
> > > Please pull from: http://linuxusb.bkbits.net/devfs-2.5
> >
> > NO! Dammit, you'll break everyone who is using these compact names to
> > mount the root FS. Look more closely at the code you're trying to
> > remove, and you'll see it's *not* used to avoid work in startup
> > scripts. It's only used to create the devfs entry for the root FS.
>
> This is 2.5 and those names were never in mainline. Use your new
> devfs names or plain linux names or just hex numbers. Linux is
> not a place were we keep junk around.
Those names *were* in mainline. They've been there all through 2.4.x.
It's a useful feature that is *still* being used. Change this and lots
of people will get a panic at boot because there root FS is "missing".
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: [email protected]
Current: [email protected]
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:27:07AM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
> Those names *were* in mainline. They've been there all through 2.4.x.
> It's a useful feature that is *still* being used. Change this and lots
> of people will get a panic at boot because there root FS is "missing".
They have never been the devfs names in_any_ kernel. Linus made you change
to saner names before merging devfs (saner code would also have been
a good idea, btw..). Anyway, 2.5 is going to initramfs, so feel free
to put devfsd into your initramfs.
Greg KH writes:
> Here's a changeset from Christoph Hellwig that removes some unneeded
> code from the kernel core. This was leftover from before devfs became
> part of the main kernel tree, and was trying to do some naming fixups in
> kernelspace. If anyone still has machines using these names, their
> startup scripts should be modified to use the "standard" devfs names.
>
> Please pull from: http://linuxusb.bkbits.net/devfs-2.5
NO! Dammit, you'll break everyone who is using these compact names to
mount the root FS. Look more closely at the code you're trying to
remove, and you'll see it's *not* used to avoid work in startup
scripts. It's only used to create the devfs entry for the root FS.
This change is gratuitous. The code is __init code anyway, so doesn't
contribute to bloat. And forcing people to migrate to the longer names
isn't reasonable, as it chews up precious space on the kernel command
line. I've had times where I ran out of space when I had too many
options.
Linus, please don't apply.
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: [email protected]
Current: [email protected]