2003-07-04 01:17:08

by Matthew Wilcox

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [7/6] PCI config space in sysfs

On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> - Fix a couple of bugs in sysfs's handling of binary files (my fault).

Now I'm having second thoughts. Sigh ;-)

My intended design was that sysfs would copy to/from buffer + offset
rather than buffer. Seems that change 1.6 to this file (hm, bkweb seems
broken at the moment?) changed that. so that broke my pci-sysfs changes
which weren't in the tree at the time.

It probably makes more sense to copy to/from buffer rather than
buffer+offset so we can implement larger sized binary files (we can use
a smaller buffer than the size of the file and do multiple read/write
calls).

So I think I'd like to hold off on this patchset, not change sysfs and
adapt my changes to the new API (which I didn't even know had changed.
grr.)

--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk


2003-07-04 02:10:52

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [7/6] PCI config space in sysfs

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 02:31:31AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > - Fix a couple of bugs in sysfs's handling of binary files (my fault).
>
> Now I'm having second thoughts. Sigh ;-)

Bleah, right after I sent these patches off :(

> My intended design was that sysfs would copy to/from buffer + offset
> rather than buffer. Seems that change 1.6 to this file (hm, bkweb seems
> broken at the moment?) changed that. so that broke my pci-sysfs changes
> which weren't in the tree at the time.
>
> It probably makes more sense to copy to/from buffer rather than
> buffer+offset so we can implement larger sized binary files (we can use
> a smaller buffer than the size of the file and do multiple read/write
> calls).
>
> So I think I'd like to hold off on this patchset, not change sysfs and
> adapt my changes to the new API (which I didn't even know had changed.
> grr.)

Ok, want to send a patch to backout only the api changes that you made?

thanks,

greg k-h