2005-11-01 18:38:28

by Matt Mackall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] slob: move kstrdup to lib/string.c

This move kstrdup to lib/string.c. This a) matches its declaration in
string.h and b) avoids having to duplicate it for SLOB.

(this work has been sponsored in part by CELF)

Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

Index: 2.6.14-slob/lib/string.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.14-slob.orig/lib/string.c 2005-10-31 13:04:50.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.14-slob/lib/string.c 2005-10-31 18:14:39.000000000 -0800
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>

#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_STRNICMP
/**
@@ -602,3 +603,25 @@ void *memchr(const void *s, int c, size_
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(memchr);
#endif
+
+/*
+ * kstrdup - allocate space for and copy an existing string
+ *
+ * @s: the string to duplicate
+ * @gfp: the GFP mask used in the kmalloc() call when allocating memory
+ */
+char *kstrdup(const char *s, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ size_t len;
+ char *buf;
+
+ if (!s)
+ return NULL;
+
+ len = strlen(s) + 1;
+ buf = kmalloc(len, gfp);
+ if (buf)
+ memcpy(buf, s, len);
+ return buf;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kstrdup);
Index: 2.6.14-slob/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.14-slob.orig/mm/slab.c 2005-10-31 13:04:50.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.14-slob/mm/slab.c 2005-10-31 18:14:43.000000000 -0800
@@ -3596,26 +3596,3 @@ unsigned int ksize(const void *objp)

return obj_reallen(GET_PAGE_CACHE(virt_to_page(objp)));
}
-
-
-/*
- * kstrdup - allocate space for and copy an existing string
- *
- * @s: the string to duplicate
- * @gfp: the GFP mask used in the kmalloc() call when allocating memory
- */
-char *kstrdup(const char *s, gfp_t gfp)
-{
- size_t len;
- char *buf;
-
- if (!s)
- return NULL;
-
- len = strlen(s) + 1;
- buf = kmalloc(len, gfp);
- if (buf)
- memcpy(buf, s, len);
- return buf;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(kstrdup);


2005-11-01 18:38:31

by Matt Mackall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] slob: introduce the SLOB allocator

configurable replacement for slab allocator

This adds a CONFIG_SLAB option under CONFIG_EMBEDDED. When CONFIG_SLAB
is disabled, the kernel falls back to using the 'SLOB' allocator.

SLOB is a traditional K&R/UNIX allocator with a SLAB emulation layer,
similar to the original Linux kmalloc allocator that SLAB replaced.
It's signicantly smaller code and is more memory efficient. But like
all similar allocators, it scales poorly and suffers from
fragmentation more than SLAB, so it's only appropriate for small
systems.

It's been tested extensively in the Linux-tiny tree. I've also
stress-tested it with make -j 8 compiles on a 3G SMP+PREEMPT box (not
recommended).

Here's a comparison for otherwise identical builds, showing SLOB
saving nearly half a megabyte of RAM:

$ size vmlinux*
text data bss dec hex filename
3336372 529360 190812 4056544 3de5e0 vmlinux-slab
3323208 527948 190684 4041840 3dac70 vmlinux-slob

$ size mm/{slab,slob}.o
text data bss dec hex filename
13221 752 48 14021 36c5 mm/slab.o
1896 52 8 1956 7a4 mm/slob.o

/proc/meminfo:
SLAB SLOB delta
MemTotal: 27964 kB 27980 kB +16 kB
MemFree: 24596 kB 25092 kB +496 kB
Buffers: 36 kB 36 kB 0 kB
Cached: 1188 kB 1188 kB 0 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB 0 kB 0 kB
Active: 608 kB 600 kB -8 kB
Inactive: 808 kB 812 kB +4 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB 0 kB 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB 0 kB 0 kB
LowTotal: 27964 kB 27980 kB +16 kB
LowFree: 24596 kB 25092 kB +496 kB
SwapTotal: 0 kB 0 kB 0 kB
SwapFree: 0 kB 0 kB 0 kB
Dirty: 4 kB 12 kB +8 kB
Writeback: 0 kB 0 kB 0 kB
Mapped: 560 kB 556 kB -4 kB
Slab: 1756 kB 0 kB -1756 kB
CommitLimit: 13980 kB 13988 kB +8 kB
Committed_AS: 4208 kB 4208 kB 0 kB
PageTables: 28 kB 28 kB 0 kB
VmallocTotal: 1007312 kB 1007312 kB 0 kB
VmallocUsed: 48 kB 48 kB 0 kB
VmallocChunk: 1007264 kB 1007264 kB 0 kB

(this work has been sponsored in part by CELF)

Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

Index: 2.6.14-slob/mm/slob.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ 2.6.14-slob/mm/slob.c 2005-11-01 09:42:01.000000000 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+/*
+ * SLOB Allocator: Simple List Of Blocks
+ *
+ * Matt Mackall <[email protected]> 12/30/03
+ *
+ * How SLOB works:
+ *
+ * The core of SLOB is a traditional K&R style heap allocator, with
+ * support for returning aligned objects. The granularity of this
+ * allocator is 8 bytes on x86, though it's perhaps possible to reduce
+ * this to 4 if it's deemed worth the effort. The slob heap is a
+ * singly-linked list of pages from __get_free_page, grown on demand
+ * and allocation from the heap is currently first-fit.
+ *
+ * Above this is an implementation of kmalloc/kfree. Blocks returned
+ * from kmalloc are 8-byte aligned and prepended with a 8-byte header.
+ * If kmalloc is asked for objects of PAGE_SIZE or larger, it calls
+ * __get_free_pages directly so that it can return page-aligned blocks
+ * and keeps a linked list of such pages and their orders. These
+ * objects are detected in kfree() by their page alignment.
+ *
+ * SLAB is emulated on top of SLOB by simply calling constructors and
+ * destructors for every SLAB allocation. Objects are returned with
+ * the 8-byte alignment unless the SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN flag is
+ * set, in which case the low-level allocator will fragment blocks to
+ * create the proper alignment. Again, objects of page-size or greater
+ * are allocated by calling __get_free_pages. As SLAB objects know
+ * their size, no separate size bookkeeping is necessary and there is
+ * essentially no allocation space overhead.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/config.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/cache.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/timer.h>
+
+struct slob_block {
+ int units;
+ struct slob_block *next;
+};
+typedef struct slob_block slob_t;
+
+#define SLOB_UNIT sizeof(slob_t)
+#define SLOB_UNITS(size) (((size) + SLOB_UNIT - 1)/SLOB_UNIT)
+#define SLOB_ALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
+
+struct bigblock {
+ int order;
+ void *pages;
+ struct bigblock *next;
+};
+typedef struct bigblock bigblock_t;
+
+static slob_t arena = { .next = &arena, .units = 1 };
+static slob_t *slobfree = &arena;
+static bigblock_t *bigblocks;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(slob_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(block_lock);
+
+static void slob_free(void *b, int size);
+
+static void *slob_alloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int align)
+{
+ slob_t *prev, *cur, *aligned = 0;
+ int delta = 0, units = SLOB_UNITS(size);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&slob_lock, flags);
+ prev = slobfree;
+ for (cur = prev->next; ; prev = cur, cur = cur->next) {
+ if (align) {
+ aligned = (slob_t *)ALIGN((unsigned long)cur, align);
+ delta = aligned - cur;
+ }
+ if (cur->units >= units + delta) { /* room enough? */
+ if (delta) { /* need to fragment head to align? */
+ aligned->units = cur->units - delta;
+ aligned->next = cur->next;
+ cur->next = aligned;
+ cur->units = delta;
+ prev = cur;
+ cur = aligned;
+ }
+
+ if (cur->units == units) /* exact fit? */
+ prev->next = cur->next; /* unlink */
+ else { /* fragment */
+ prev->next = cur + units;
+ prev->next->units = cur->units - units;
+ prev->next->next = cur->next;
+ cur->units = units;
+ }
+
+ slobfree = prev;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&slob_lock, flags);
+ return cur;
+ }
+ if (cur == slobfree) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&slob_lock, flags);
+
+ if (size == PAGE_SIZE) /* trying to shrink arena? */
+ return 0;
+
+ cur = (slob_t *)__get_free_page(gfp);
+ if (!cur)
+ return 0;
+
+ slob_free(cur, PAGE_SIZE);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&slob_lock, flags);
+ cur = slobfree;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void slob_free(void *block, int size)
+{
+ slob_t *cur, *b = (slob_t *)block;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!block)
+ return;
+
+ if (size)
+ b->units = SLOB_UNITS(size);
+
+ /* Find reinsertion point */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&slob_lock, flags);
+ for (cur = slobfree; !(b > cur && b < cur->next); cur = cur->next)
+ if (cur >= cur->next && (b > cur || b < cur->next))
+ break;
+
+ if (b + b->units == cur->next) {
+ b->units += cur->next->units;
+ b->next = cur->next->next;
+ } else
+ b->next = cur->next;
+
+ if (cur + cur->units == b) {
+ cur->units += b->units;
+ cur->next = b->next;
+ } else
+ cur->next = b;
+
+ slobfree = cur;
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&slob_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int FASTCALL(find_order(int size));
+static int fastcall find_order(int size)
+{
+ int order = 0;
+ for ( ; size > 4096 ; size >>=1)
+ order++;
+ return order;
+}
+
+void *kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ slob_t *m;
+ bigblock_t *bb;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (size < PAGE_SIZE - SLOB_UNIT) {
+ m = slob_alloc(size + SLOB_UNIT, gfp, 0);
+ return m ? (void *)(m + 1) : 0;
+ }
+
+ bb = slob_alloc(sizeof(bigblock_t), gfp, 0);
+ if (!bb)
+ return 0;
+
+ bb->order = find_order(size);
+ bb->pages = (void *)__get_free_pages(gfp, bb->order);
+
+ if (bb->pages) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&block_lock, flags);
+ bb->next = bigblocks;
+ bigblocks = bb;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&block_lock, flags);
+ return bb->pages;
+ }
+
+ slob_free(bb, sizeof(bigblock_t));
+ return 0;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmalloc);
+
+void *kzalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
+{
+ void *ret = kmalloc(size, flags);
+ if (ret)
+ memset(ret, 0, size);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kzalloc);
+
+void kfree(const void *block)
+{
+ bigblock_t *bb, **last = &bigblocks;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!block)
+ return;
+
+ if (!((unsigned int)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
+ /* might be on the big block list */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&block_lock, flags);
+ for (bb = bigblocks; bb; last = &bb->next, bb = bb->next) {
+ if (bb->pages == block) {
+ *last = bb->next;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&block_lock, flags);
+ free_pages((unsigned long)block, bb->order);
+ slob_free(bb, sizeof(bigblock_t));
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&block_lock, flags);
+ }
+
+ slob_free((slob_t *)block - 1, 0);
+ return;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree);
+
+unsigned int ksize(const void *block)
+{
+ bigblock_t *bb;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!block)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!((unsigned int)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&block_lock, flags);
+ for (bb = bigblocks; bb; bb = bb->next)
+ if (bb->pages == block) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&slob_lock, flags);
+ return PAGE_SIZE << bb->order;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&block_lock, flags);
+ }
+
+ return ((slob_t *)block - 1)->units * SLOB_UNIT;
+}
+
+struct kmem_cache_s {
+ unsigned int size, align;
+ const char *name;
+ void (*ctor)(void *, kmem_cache_t *, unsigned long);
+ void (*dtor)(void *, kmem_cache_t *, unsigned long);
+};
+
+kmem_cache_t *kmem_cache_create(const char *name, size_t size, size_t align,
+ unsigned long flags,
+ void (*ctor)(void*, kmem_cache_t *, unsigned long),
+ void (*dtor)(void*, kmem_cache_t *, unsigned long))
+{
+ kmem_cache_t *c;
+
+ c = slob_alloc(sizeof(kmem_cache_t), flags, 0);
+
+ if (c) {
+ c->name = name;
+ c->size = size;
+ c->ctor = ctor;
+ c->dtor = dtor;
+ /* ignore alignment unless it's forced */
+ c->align = (flags & SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN) ? SLOB_ALIGN : 0;
+ if (c->align < align)
+ c->align = align;
+ }
+
+ return c;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_create);
+
+int kmem_cache_destroy(kmem_cache_t *c)
+{
+ slob_free(c, sizeof(kmem_cache_t));
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_destroy);
+
+void *kmem_cache_alloc(kmem_cache_t *c, gfp_t flags)
+{
+ void *b;
+
+ if (c->size < PAGE_SIZE)
+ b = slob_alloc(c->size, flags, c->align);
+ else
+ b = (void *)__get_free_pages(flags, find_order(c->size));
+
+ if (c->ctor)
+ c->ctor(b, c, SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR);
+
+ return b;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc);
+
+void kmem_cache_free(kmem_cache_t *c, void *b)
+{
+ if (c->dtor)
+ c->dtor(b, c, 0);
+
+ if (c->size < PAGE_SIZE)
+ slob_free(b, c->size);
+ else
+ free_pages((unsigned long)b, find_order(c->size));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_free);
+
+unsigned int kmem_cache_size(kmem_cache_t *c)
+{
+ return c->size;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_size);
+
+const char *kmem_cache_name(kmem_cache_t *c)
+{
+ return c->name;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_name);
+
+static struct timer_list slob_timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(
+ (void (*)(unsigned long))kmem_cache_init, 0, 0);
+
+void kmem_cache_init(void)
+{
+ void *p = slob_alloc(PAGE_SIZE, 0, PAGE_SIZE-1);
+
+ if (p)
+ free_page((unsigned int)p);
+
+ mod_timer(&slob_timer, jiffies + HZ);
+}
+
+atomic_t slab_reclaim_pages = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(slab_reclaim_pages);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
+void *__alloc_percpu(size_t size, size_t align)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct percpu_data *pdata = kmalloc(sizeof (*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (!pdata)
+ return NULL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
+ if (!cpu_possible(i))
+ continue;
+ pdata->ptrs[i] = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pdata->ptrs[i])
+ goto unwind_oom;
+ memset(pdata->ptrs[i], 0, size);
+ }
+
+ /* Catch derefs w/o wrappers */
+ return (void *) (~(unsigned long) pdata);
+
+unwind_oom:
+ while (--i >= 0) {
+ if (!cpu_possible(i))
+ continue;
+ kfree(pdata->ptrs[i]);
+ }
+ kfree(pdata);
+ return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__alloc_percpu);
+
+void
+free_percpu(const void *objp)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct percpu_data *p = (struct percpu_data *) (~(unsigned long) objp);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
+ if (!cpu_possible(i))
+ continue;
+ kfree(p->ptrs[i]);
+ }
+ kfree(p);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_percpu);
+
+#endif
Index: 2.6.14-slob/mm/Makefile
===================================================================
--- 2.6.14-slob.orig/mm/Makefile 2005-10-31 19:17:12.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.14-slob/mm/Makefile 2005-10-31 19:17:14.000000000 -0800
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ mmu-$(CONFIG_MMU) := fremap.o highmem.o

obj-y := bootmem.o filemap.o mempool.o oom_kill.o fadvise.o \
page_alloc.o page-writeback.o pdflush.o \
- readahead.o slab.o swap.o truncate.o vmscan.o \
+ readahead.o swap.o truncate.o vmscan.o \
prio_tree.o $(mmu-y)

obj-$(CONFIG_SWAP) += page_io.o swap_state.o swapfile.o thrash.o
@@ -18,5 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += mempolicy.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) += sparse.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SHMEM) += shmem.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM) += tiny-shmem.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SLOB) += slob.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SLAB) += slab.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG) += memory_hotplug.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FS_XIP) += filemap_xip.o
Index: 2.6.14-slob/include/linux/slab.h
===================================================================
--- 2.6.14-slob.orig/include/linux/slab.h 2005-10-31 19:17:12.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.14-slob/include/linux/slab.h 2005-10-31 19:17:14.000000000 -0800
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ typedef struct kmem_cache_s kmem_cache_t
#define SLAB_CTOR_ATOMIC 0x002UL /* tell constructor it can't sleep */
#define SLAB_CTOR_VERIFY 0x004UL /* tell constructor it's a verify call */

+#ifndef CONFIG_SLOB
+
/* prototypes */
extern void __init kmem_cache_init(void);

@@ -134,6 +136,38 @@ static inline void *kmalloc_node(size_t
extern int FASTCALL(kmem_cache_reap(int));
extern int FASTCALL(kmem_ptr_validate(kmem_cache_t *cachep, void *ptr));

+#else /* CONFIG_SLOB */
+
+/* SLOB allocator routines */
+
+void kmem_cache_init(void);
+kmem_cache_t *kmem_find_general_cachep(size_t, gfp_t gfpflags);
+kmem_cache_t *kmem_cache_create(const char *c, size_t, size_t, unsigned long,
+ void (*)(void *, kmem_cache_t *, unsigned long),
+ void (*)(void *, kmem_cache_t *, unsigned long));
+int kmem_cache_destroy(kmem_cache_t *c);
+void *kmem_cache_alloc(kmem_cache_t *c, gfp_t flags);
+void kmem_cache_free(kmem_cache_t *c, void *b);
+const char *kmem_cache_name(kmem_cache_t *);
+void *kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags);
+void *kzalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags);
+void kfree(const void *m);
+unsigned int ksize(const void *m);
+unsigned int kmem_cache_size(kmem_cache_t *c);
+
+static inline void *kcalloc(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
+{
+ return kzalloc(n * size, flags);
+}
+
+#define kmem_cache_shrink(d) (0)
+#define kmem_cache_reap(a)
+#define kmem_ptr_validate(a, b) (0)
+#define kmem_cache_alloc_node(c, f, n) kmem_cache_alloc(c, f)
+#define kmalloc_node(s, f, n) kmalloc(s, f)
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_SLOB */
+
/* System wide caches */
extern kmem_cache_t *vm_area_cachep;
extern kmem_cache_t *names_cachep;
Index: 2.6.14-slob/init/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- 2.6.14-slob.orig/init/Kconfig 2005-10-31 19:17:12.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.14-slob/init/Kconfig 2005-10-31 19:17:14.000000000 -0800
@@ -398,6 +398,15 @@ config CC_ALIGN_JUMPS
no dummy operations need be executed.
Zero means use compiler's default.

+config SLAB
+ default y
+ bool "Use full SLAB allocator" if EMBEDDED
+ help
+ Disabling this replaces the advanced SLAB allocator and
+ kmalloc support with the drastically simpler SLOB allocator.
+ SLOB is more space efficient but does not scale well and is
+ more susceptible to fragmentation.
+
endmenu # General setup

config TINY_SHMEM
@@ -409,6 +418,10 @@ config BASE_SMALL
default 0 if BASE_FULL
default 1 if !BASE_FULL

+config SLOB
+ default !SLAB
+ bool
+
menu "Loadable module support"

config MODULES
Index: 2.6.14-slob/fs/proc/proc_misc.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.14-slob.orig/fs/proc/proc_misc.c 2005-10-31 19:17:12.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.14-slob/fs/proc/proc_misc.c 2005-10-31 19:17:14.000000000 -0800
@@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ static struct file_operations proc_modul
};
#endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB
extern struct seq_operations slabinfo_op;
extern ssize_t slabinfo_write(struct file *, const char __user *, size_t, loff_t *);
static int slabinfo_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
@@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ static struct file_operations proc_slabi
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release,
};
+#endif

static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
{
@@ -600,7 +602,9 @@ void __init proc_misc_init(void)
create_seq_entry("partitions", 0, &proc_partitions_operations);
create_seq_entry("stat", 0, &proc_stat_operations);
create_seq_entry("interrupts", 0, &proc_interrupts_operations);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB
create_seq_entry("slabinfo",S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
+#endif
create_seq_entry("buddyinfo",S_IRUGO, &fragmentation_file_operations);
create_seq_entry("vmstat",S_IRUGO, &proc_vmstat_file_operations);
create_seq_entry("zoneinfo",S_IRUGO, &proc_zoneinfo_file_operations);

2005-11-01 20:57:06

by Rob Landley

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slob: introduce the SLOB allocator

On Tuesday 01 November 2005 12:33, Matt Mackall wrote:
> SLOB is a traditional K&R/UNIX allocator with a SLAB emulation layer,
> similar to the original Linux kmalloc allocator that SLAB replaced.
> It's signicantly smaller code and is more memory efficient. But like
> all similar allocators, it scales poorly and suffers from
> fragmentation more than SLAB, so it's only appropriate for small
> systems.

Just to clarify: define "small". My current laptop has half a gigabyte of
ram. (Yeah, I broke down and bought a real machine, and even kept a World of
Warcraft partition this time...)

Does small mean "this is better for laptops with < 4gig"? In which case,
possibly this should be tied to CONFIG_HIGHMEM or some such?

Rob

2005-11-01 21:11:30

by Matt Mackall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slob: introduce the SLOB allocator

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:51:54PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 November 2005 12:33, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > SLOB is a traditional K&R/UNIX allocator with a SLAB emulation layer,
> > similar to the original Linux kmalloc allocator that SLAB replaced.
> > It's signicantly smaller code and is more memory efficient. But like
> > all similar allocators, it scales poorly and suffers from
> > fragmentation more than SLAB, so it's only appropriate for small
> > systems.
>
> Just to clarify: define "small". My current laptop has half a gigabyte of
> ram. (Yeah, I broke down and bought a real machine, and even kept a World of
> Warcraft partition this time...)
>
> Does small mean "this is better for laptops with < 4gig"? In which case,
> possibly this should be tied to CONFIG_HIGHMEM or some such?

This is targeted at the bottom of the range that Linux supports, ie
less than 32MB. I originally tested it with _2MB_.

This allocator's performance is linear in the number of
smaller-than-a-page memory fragments (page-sized fragments get
coalesced and handed back to the buddy allocator). When you've only
got 4MB, scanning through all those fragments doesn't take long. When
you've got 400MB, and a lot of fragmentation, it can be very slow
indeed. SLAB, on the other hand, is nearly O(1).

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

2005-11-02 07:01:04

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: move kstrdup to lib/string.c

Matt Mackall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This move kstrdup to lib/string.c

The placement in slab.c was deliberate. Putting it in lib/string.c breaks
ppc32.

ppc32 is reusing lib/string.c to build early userspace or something
like that, and calling kmalloc from there broke stuff.

2005-11-02 07:08:49

by Matt Mackall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: move kstrdup to lib/string.c

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:00:53PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Matt Mackall <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This move kstrdup to lib/string.c
>
> The placement in slab.c was deliberate. Putting it in lib/string.c breaks
> ppc32.
>
> ppc32 is reusing lib/string.c to build early userspace or something
> like that, and calling kmalloc from there broke stuff.

That doesn't sound kosher, have a pointer?

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

2005-11-02 07:40:31

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: move kstrdup to lib/string.c

Matt Mackall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:00:53PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Matt Mackall <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This move kstrdup to lib/string.c
> >
> > The placement in slab.c was deliberate. Putting it in lib/string.c breaks
> > ppc32.
> >
> > ppc32 is reusing lib/string.c to build early userspace or something
> > like that, and calling kmalloc from there broke stuff.
>
> That doesn't sound kosher, have a pointer?
>

http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/8/128

2005-11-02 09:17:21

by Paul Mackerras

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: move kstrdup to lib/string.c

Andrew Morton writes:

> > That doesn't sound kosher, have a pointer?
> >
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/8/128

Yes, we currently use bits of lib/ in the zImage boot wrapper. I
suspect we used to have our own string routines for the boot wrapper
until somebody said "why do we have all this code duplicated" and
cleaned it up. :)

Paul.

2005-11-02 13:04:38

by Olaf Hering

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: move kstrdup to lib/string.c

On Wed, Nov 02, Paul Mackeras wrote:

> Andrew Morton writes:
>
> > > That doesn't sound kosher, have a pointer?
> > >
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/8/128
>
> Yes, we currently use bits of lib/ in the zImage boot wrapper. I
> suspect we used to have our own string routines for the boot wrapper
> until somebody said "why do we have all this code duplicated" and
> cleaned it up. :)

We cant continue to use files from lib/ in arch/powerpc/boot when they
start to use kernel internals like kmalloc. I converted a few
zlib_inflate files with sed already. But things will get really ugly if
we have to do more on-the-fly modifications. After all,
arch/$ARCH/boot is no kernel code, it has to be standalone.
Maybe we should just have no arch/powerpc/boot.

--
short story of a lazy sysadmin:
alias appserv=wotan

2005-11-02 14:14:09

by Tom Rini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: move kstrdup to lib/string.c

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:04:35PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, Paul Mackeras wrote:
>
> > Andrew Morton writes:
> >
> > > > That doesn't sound kosher, have a pointer?
> > > >
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/8/128
> >
> > Yes, we currently use bits of lib/ in the zImage boot wrapper. I
> > suspect we used to have our own string routines for the boot wrapper
> > until somebody said "why do we have all this code duplicated" and
> > cleaned it up. :)
>
> We cant continue to use files from lib/ in arch/powerpc/boot when they
> start to use kernel internals like kmalloc. I converted a few
> zlib_inflate files with sed already. But things will get really ugly if
> we have to do more on-the-fly modifications. After all,
> arch/$ARCH/boot is no kernel code, it has to be standalone.
> Maybe we should just have no arch/powerpc/boot.

I've always thought one of the nice points about ppc linux was that the
kernel just booted on your board, no matter what crazy firmware there
was.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

2005-11-02 14:19:56

by Olaf Hering

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: move kstrdup to lib/string.c

On Wed, Nov 02, Tom Rini wrote:

> I've always thought one of the nice points about ppc linux was that the
> kernel just booted on your board, no matter what crazy firmware there
> was.

I cant speak for anything else than CONFIG_PPC_MULTIPLATFORM, but I bet
almost noone really uses the boot wrapper from the kernel. An external
mkzimage for the rest of the supported boards sounds like a good plan.
Cant be that hard to maintain as the kernel interface is stable.
We have such thing in opensuse, it needs an update for PReP and iSeries
to provide the flat device tree.

--
short story of a lazy sysadmin:
alias appserv=wotan

2005-11-02 14:31:21

by Tom Rini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: move kstrdup to lib/string.c

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:19:54PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > I've always thought one of the nice points about ppc linux was that the
> > kernel just booted on your board, no matter what crazy firmware there
> > was.
>
> I cant speak for anything else than CONFIG_PPC_MULTIPLATFORM, but I bet
> almost noone really uses the boot wrapper from the kernel. An external
> mkzimage for the rest of the supported boards sounds like a good plan.
> Cant be that hard to maintain as the kernel interface is stable.
> We have such thing in opensuse, it needs an update for PReP and iSeries
> to provide the flat device tree.

That's true, but PPC_MULTIPLATFORM (in old speak) was also the boring
case. The problem with ripping it out is there's always a reliance on
things the kernel knows anyhow (serial is here, something else we need
to kick is there, and so on). Not that it couldn't be duplicated
elsewhere, but it would be duplication.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/