2008-08-01 22:42:55

by Jeff Dike

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 10/14] uml: stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH

>From b4783df9f0fefe1af0b828748b8abe39ada65652 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

We lost the marking of SIGWINCH as being OK to receive during stub
execution, causing a panic should that happen.

Cc: Benedict Verheyen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
---
arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
index 1e8cba6..2328098 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ptrace_dump_regs(int pid)
* Signals that are OK to receive in the stub - we'll just continue it.
* SIGWINCH will happen when UML is inside a detached screen.
*/
-#define STUB_SIG_MASK (1 << SIGVTALRM)
+#define STUB_SIG_MASK ((1 << SIGVTALRM) | (1 << SIGWINCH))

/* Signals that the stub will finish with - anything else is an error */
#define STUB_DONE_MASK (1 << SIGTRAP)
--
1.5.5.1