-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
---------------------
From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
upstream commit: bdff549ebeff92b1a6952e5501caf16a6f8898c8
The "simplify spi_write_then_read()" patch included two regressions from
the 2.6.27 behaviors:
- The data it wrote out during the (full duplex) read side
of the transfer was not zeroed.
- It fails completely on half duplex hardware, such as
Microwire and most "3-wire" SPI variants.
So, revert that patch. A revised version should be submitted at some
point, which can get the speedup on standard hardware (full duplex)
without breaking on less-capable half-duplex stuff.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
drivers/spi/spi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ int spi_write_then_read(struct spi_devic
int status;
struct spi_message message;
- struct spi_transfer x;
+ struct spi_transfer x[2];
u8 *local_buf;
/* Use preallocated DMA-safe buffer. We can't avoid copying here,
@@ -669,9 +669,15 @@ int spi_write_then_read(struct spi_devic
return -EINVAL;
spi_message_init(&message);
- memset(&x, 0, sizeof x);
- x.len = n_tx + n_rx;
- spi_message_add_tail(&x, &message);
+ memset(x, 0, sizeof x);
+ if (n_tx) {
+ x[0].len = n_tx;
+ spi_message_add_tail(&x[0], &message);
+ }
+ if (n_rx) {
+ x[1].len = n_rx;
+ spi_message_add_tail(&x[1], &message);
+ }
/* ... unless someone else is using the pre-allocated buffer */
if (!mutex_trylock(&lock)) {
@@ -682,15 +688,15 @@ int spi_write_then_read(struct spi_devic
local_buf = buf;
memcpy(local_buf, txbuf, n_tx);
- x.tx_buf = local_buf;
- x.rx_buf = local_buf;
+ x[0].tx_buf = local_buf;
+ x[1].rx_buf = local_buf + n_tx;
/* do the i/o */
status = spi_sync(spi, &message);
if (status == 0)
- memcpy(rxbuf, x.rx_buf + n_tx, n_rx);
+ memcpy(rxbuf, x[1].rx_buf, n_rx);
- if (x.tx_buf == buf)
+ if (x[0].tx_buf == buf)
mutex_unlock(&lock);
else
kfree(local_buf);