Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you think you need more Acks or if there are other
> reasons to have it go through arm-soc, please tell me and I'll try harder
> to find the time for a proper review.
Any chance you could carve out some time for reviewing remoteproc and
rpmsg [1] ?
I hope we could either get your Acks on the patches or even have it go
through arm-soc for 3.4.
Thanks!
Ohad.
[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ohad/remoteproc.git
rpmsg-for-3.3
On Wednesday 01 February 2012, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you think you need more Acks or if there are other
> > reasons to have it go through arm-soc, please tell me and I'll try harder
> > to find the time for a proper review.
>
> Any chance you could carve out some time for reviewing remoteproc and
> rpmsg [1] ?
I will.
> I hope we could either get your Acks on the patches or even have it go
> through arm-soc for 3.4.
Yes, I think it's best to have it merged through arm-soc, in case Linus
is more likely to take it from there than pull from your tree.
Arnd
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> I will.
Thanks.
> Yes, I think it's best to have it merged through arm-soc, in case Linus
> is more likely to take it from there than pull from your tree.
Great, thanks.
Ohad.