2013-04-24 11:16:41

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] usb: gadget: multi: Mark {cdc,rndis}_config_register() __init

If gcc (e.g. 4.1.2) decides not to inline cdc_config_register() and
rndis_config_register(), this will cause section mismatch warnings:

WARNING: drivers/usb/gadget/g_multi.o(.text+0x32f6): Section mismatch in reference from the function cdc_config_register() to the function .init.text:cdc_do_config()
The function cdc_config_register() references
the function __init cdc_do_config().
This is often because cdc_config_register lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of cdc_do_config is wrong.

WARNING: drivers/usb/gadget/g_multi.o(.text+0x3326): Section mismatch in reference from the function rndis_config_register() to the function .init.text:rndis_do_config()
The function rndis_config_register() references
the function __init rndis_do_config().
This is often because rndis_config_register lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of rndis_do_config is wrong.

Fortunately they're harmless, as {cdc,rndis}_config_register() are only
called from multi_bind(), which is annotated with __ref.

Mark {cdc,rndis}_config_register() with the __init annotation to kill the
warning.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
---
Note: I did not verify that multi_bind() is rightfully marked __ref.

drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c
index 20bbbf9..db63d9e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ err_func_acm:
return ret;
}

-static int rndis_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
+static __init int rndis_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
{
static struct usb_configuration config = {
.bConfigurationValue = MULTI_RNDIS_CONFIG_NUM,
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int rndis_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)

#else

-static int rndis_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
+static __init int rndis_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ err_func_acm:
return ret;
}

-static int cdc_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
+static __init int cdc_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
{
static struct usb_configuration config = {
.bConfigurationValue = MULTI_CDC_CONFIG_NUM,
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static int cdc_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)

#else

-static int cdc_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
+static __init int cdc_config_register(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
{
return 0;
}
--
1.7.0.4


2013-04-25 09:08:37

by Felipe Balbi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: multi: Mark {cdc,rndis}_config_register() __init

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:05:46AM -0700, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > If gcc (e.g. 4.1.2) decides not to inline cdc_config_register() and
> > rndis_config_register(), this will cause section mismatch warnings:
> >
> > WARNING: drivers/usb/gadget/g_multi.o(.text+0x32f6): Section mismatch in reference from the function cdc_config_register() to the function .init.text:cdc_do_config()
> > The function cdc_config_register() references
> > the function __init cdc_do_config().
> > This is often because cdc_config_register lacks a __init
> > annotation or the annotation of cdc_do_config is wrong.
> >
> > WARNING: drivers/usb/gadget/g_multi.o(.text+0x3326): Section mismatch in reference from the function rndis_config_register() to the function .init.text:rndis_do_config()
> > The function rndis_config_register() references
> > the function __init rndis_do_config().
> > This is often because rndis_config_register lacks a __init
> > annotation or the annotation of rndis_do_config is wrong.
> >
> > Fortunately they're harmless, as {cdc,rndis}_config_register() are only
> > called from multi_bind(), which is annotated with __ref.
> >
> > Mark {cdc,rndis}_config_register() with the __init annotation to kill the
> > warning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <[email protected]>
>
> With transition to configfs all those __inits and __refs will probably
> go away in the long term though.

that's what I thought. Wouldn't it be better to remove them all already?

--
balbi


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.56 kB)
signature.asc (836.00 B)
Digital signature
Download all attachments