2013-07-22 23:55:21

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: status of various trees

Hi Grant,

Currently linux-next has the following gpio trees:

gpio-current git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/merge
gpio git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/next
gpio-lw git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git#for-next

Given commit a0062d4e3a0a ("MAINTAINERS: Remove Grant Likely") in the
devicetree-current tree today, should I remove the first two and rename
the third to be just "gpio"? (And does Linus have an alternative
"current" tree?)

I also have the irqdomain tree:

irqdomain git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git#irqdomain/next

Should I remove that? And is there going to be an alternative?

And for spi, I have:

spi git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#spi/next
spi-mb git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git#for-next

again, should I remove the first and rename the second?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]


Attachments:
(No filename) (933.00 B)
(No filename) (836.00 B)
Download all attachments

2013-07-23 12:39:10

by Grant Likely

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: status of various trees

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Currently linux-next has the following gpio trees:
>
> gpio-current git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/merge
> gpio git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/next
> gpio-lw git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git#for-next
>
> Given commit a0062d4e3a0a ("MAINTAINERS: Remove Grant Likely") in the
> devicetree-current tree today, should I remove the first two and rename
> the third to be just "gpio"? (And does Linus have an alternative
> "current" tree?)
>
> I also have the irqdomain tree:
>
> irqdomain git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git#irqdomain/next
>
> Should I remove that? And is there going to be an alternative?
>
> And for spi, I have:
>
> spi git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#spi/next
> spi-mb git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git#for-next
>
> again, should I remove the first and rename the second?

Yes on all of the above. Thanks.

g.

2013-07-24 00:21:37

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: status of various trees

Hi Grant,

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:38:45 +0100 Grant Likely <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Currently linux-next has the following gpio trees:
> >
> > gpio-current git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/merge
> > gpio git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/next
> > gpio-lw git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git#for-next
> >
> > Given commit a0062d4e3a0a ("MAINTAINERS: Remove Grant Likely") in the
> > devicetree-current tree today, should I remove the first two and rename
> > the third to be just "gpio"? (And does Linus have an alternative
> > "current" tree?)
> >
> > I also have the irqdomain tree:
> >
> > irqdomain git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git#irqdomain/next
> >
> > Should I remove that? And is there going to be an alternative?
> >
> > And for spi, I have:
> >
> > spi git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#spi/next
> > spi-mb git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git#for-next
> >
> > again, should I remove the first and rename the second?
>
> Yes on all of the above. Thanks.

OK, I have done all that. I also removed the irqdomain-current and
spi-current trees.

So the trees I have left that you are responsible for are:

devicetree-current git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/merge
devicetree git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/next
arm-dt git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/arm-next

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.59 kB)
(No filename) (836.00 B)
Download all attachments

2013-07-24 10:01:30

by Grant Likely

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: status of various trees

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, I have done all that. I also removed the irqdomain-current and
> spi-current trees.
>
> So the trees I have left that you are responsible for are:
>
> devicetree-current git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/merge
> devicetree git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/next
> arm-dt git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/arm-next

You can drop the arm-dt tree also.

Thanks,
g.

2013-07-25 00:04:31

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: status of various trees

Hi Grant,

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:01:07 +0100 Grant Likely <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > OK, I have done all that. I also removed the irqdomain-current and
> > spi-current trees.
> >
> > So the trees I have left that you are responsible for are:
> >
> > devicetree-current git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/merge
> > devicetree git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/next
> > arm-dt git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/arm-next
>
> You can drop the arm-dt tree also.

Done.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]


Attachments:
(No filename) (709.00 B)
(No filename) (836.00 B)
Download all attachments