This change restricts the check for the for the FSF address in the GPL
copyright statement so that it only flags the address, not the references to
the gnu.org/licenses URL which appear in numerous drivers.
So for example this statement will still return an error:
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
However, this statement will not return an error after this patch:
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 9c98100..ba3c9c3 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -1963,8 +1963,7 @@ sub process {
}
# Check for FSF mailing addresses.
- if ($rawline =~ /You should have received a copy/ ||
- $rawline =~ /write to the Free Software/ ||
+ if ($rawline =~ /write to the Free Software/ ||
$rawline =~ /59 Temple Place/ ||
$rawline =~ /51 Franklin Street/) {
my $herevet = "$here\n" . cat_vet($rawline) . "\n";
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:16:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> This change restricts the check for the for the FSF address in the GPL
> copyright statement so that it only flags the address, not the references to
> the gnu.org/licenses URL which appear in numerous drivers.
>
> So for example this statement will still return an error:
> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
>
> However, this statement will not return an error after this patch:
> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
Why is this paragraph needed? The kernel does come with a copy of the
GPL, so it's not an issue for kernel files, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
On 01/06/2014 03:27 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:16:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> This change restricts the check for the for the FSF address in the GPL
>> copyright statement so that it only flags the address, not the references to
>> the gnu.org/licenses URL which appear in numerous drivers.
>>
>> So for example this statement will still return an error:
>> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>> Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
>>
>> However, this statement will not return an error after this patch:
>> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>
> Why is this paragraph needed? The kernel does come with a copy of the
> GPL, so it's not an issue for kernel files, right?
>
(IANAL but...) Presumably some people might be concerned about it
because of either patches on mailing lists or otherwise separate from
the kernel, or if someone pulls individual files out of the kernel tree
for another project.
-hpa
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 15:16 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> This change restricts the check for the for the FSF address in the GPL
> copyright statement so that it only flags the address, not the references to
> the gnu.org/licenses URL which appear in numerous drivers.
Hello Alexander
There is already a checkpatch fsf patch in -next.
Please make patches against that.
cheers, Joe
---
$ git show --format=email 365b438dd5d
>From 365b438dd5dbb1cd5f4310efe51a7aada8e481b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:10:18 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: update the FSF/GPL address check
The FSF address check is a bit too verbose looking for the GPL text.
Quiet it a bit by requiring --strict for the GPL bit.
Also make the address tests match a few uses of abbreviations for street
names and make it case insensitive.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 7e48d13..59be6d7 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -1970,15 +1970,16 @@ sub process {
}
# Check for FSF mailing addresses.
- if ($rawline =~ /You should have received a copy/ ||
- $rawline =~ /write to the Free Software/ ||
- $rawline =~ /59 Temple Place/ ||
- $rawline =~ /51 Franklin Street/) {
+ if ($rawline =~ /\bYou should have received a copy/i ||
+ $rawline =~ /\bwrite to the Free/i ||
+ $rawline =~ /\b59\s+Temple\s+Pl/i ||
+ $rawline =~ /\b51\s+Franklin\s+St/i) {
my $herevet = "$here\n" . cat_vet($rawline) . "\n";
my $msg_type = \&ERROR;
$msg_type = \&CHK if ($file);
+ $msg_type = \&CHK if ($rawline =~ /\bYou should have received a copy/i);
&{$msg_type}("FSF_MAILING_ADDRESS",
- "Do not include the paragraph about writing to the Free Software Foundation's mailing address from the sample GPL notice. The FSF has changed addresses in the past, and may do so again. Linux already includes a copy of the GPL.\n" . $herevet)
+ "Do not include the paragraph about writing to the Free Software Foundation's mailing address from the sample GPL notice. The FSF has changed addresses in the past, and may do so again. Linux already includes a copy of the GPL.\n" . $herevet)
}
# check for Kconfig help text having a real description
On 01/06/2014 03:52 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/06/2014 03:27 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:16:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> This change restricts the check for the for the FSF address in the GPL
>>> copyright statement so that it only flags the address, not the references to
>>> the gnu.org/licenses URL which appear in numerous drivers.
>>>
>>> So for example this statement will still return an error:
>>> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>> along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>>> Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
>>>
>>> However, this statement will not return an error after this patch:
>>> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>> along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>
>> Why is this paragraph needed? The kernel does come with a copy of the
>> GPL, so it's not an issue for kernel files, right?
>>
>
> (IANAL but...) Presumably some people might be concerned about it
> because of either patches on mailing lists or otherwise separate from
> the kernel, or if someone pulls individual files out of the kernel tree
> for another project.
>
> -hpa
>
>
The individual files issue the main concern. For our driver we have
bits that are often copied out without the rest of the kernel. User
space drivers are a perfect example. As a result we find a number of
spots where our driver files are copied and there is no COPYING file.
Thanks,
Alex