Used semantic patch with 'make coccicheck MODE=patch COCCI=script.cocci':
---8<----
virtual patch
@@
struct nand_chip c;
struct nand_chip *cp;
@@
(
-(cp)->flash_node
+nand_get_flash_node(cp)
|
-(c).flash_node
+nand_get_flash_node(&c)
)
---8<----
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
---
Hi Brian,
I think this patch could be part of your series too.
Best Regards,
Boris
drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 2 +-
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 6 +++---
drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
index a37659d..2a437c7 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ static int brcmnand_setup_dev(struct brcmnand_host *host)
memset(cfg, 0, sizeof(*cfg));
- ret = of_property_read_u32(chip->flash_node,
+ ret = of_property_read_u32(nand_get_flash_node(chip),
"brcm,nand-oob-sector-size",
&oob_sector);
if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 939ab3d..4ac4efe 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -3989,11 +3989,11 @@ int nand_scan_ident(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips,
struct nand_flash_dev *type;
int ret;
- if (chip->flash_node) {
+ if (nand_get_flash_node(chip)) {
/* MTD can automatically handle DT partitions, etc. */
- mtd_set_of_node(mtd, chip->flash_node);
+ mtd_set_of_node(mtd, nand_get_flash_node(chip));
- ret = nand_dt_init(mtd, chip, chip->flash_node);
+ ret = nand_dt_init(mtd, chip, nand_get_flash_node(chip));
if (ret)
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c
index b6df4c6..1c86c6b 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
for_each_available_child_of_node(nfc->dev->of_node, child) {
if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "fsl,vf610-nfc-nandcs")) {
- if (chip->flash_node) {
+ if (nand_get_flash_node(chip)) {
dev_err(nfc->dev,
"Only one NAND chip supported!\n");
err = -EINVAL;
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
}
- if (!chip->flash_node) {
+ if (!nand_get_flash_node(chip)) {
dev_err(nfc->dev, "NAND chip sub-node missing!\n");
err = -ENODEV;
goto err_clk;
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
error:
- of_node_put(chip->flash_node);
+ of_node_put(nand_get_flash_node(chip));
err_clk:
clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->clk);
return err;
--
2.1.4
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:03:38AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Used semantic patch with 'make coccicheck MODE=patch COCCI=script.cocci':
>
> ---8<----
> virtual patch
>
> @@
> struct nand_chip c;
> struct nand_chip *cp;
> @@
> (
> -(cp)->flash_node
> +nand_get_flash_node(cp)
> |
> -(c).flash_node
> +nand_get_flash_node(&c)
> )
> ---8<----
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
> ---
> Hi Brian,
>
> I think this patch could be part of your series too.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
Thanks! Pushed to l2-mtd.git/next