This has really been a long time, not sure we have any concern on this?
This change looks good to me which make the numa emulation more robust.
And David has acked.
Welcome any comments on this.
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:04:50PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>My previous patch "x86/mm/numa: Remove numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()" hits a
>problem in numa_emulation. The reason is numa_nodes_parsed is not set
>correctly after emulation.
>
>This patch set tries to fix this and also with two code refine.
>
>Detailed discussions are in this thread:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/13/1230
>
>and test result is posted :
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/10/641
>
>V2:
> * refresh the change log based on David comments
> * use nodes_clear()
>
>Wei Yang (3):
> x86/numa_emulation: fix potential memory leak
> x86/numa_emulation: assign physnode_mask directly from
> numa_nodes_parsed
> x86/numa_emulation: restructures numa_nodes_parsed from emulated nodes
>
> arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
>--
>2.11.0
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me