Hi Eric and Marc,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:42:44PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 07/11/17 13:06, Auger Eric wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > On 27/10/2017 16:28, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> Let's use the irq bypass mechanism introduced for platform device
> >> interrupts
> > nit: I would remove "introduced for platform device interrupts"
> > as this is not upstream yet. x86 posted interrupts also use it.
> >
> >>
> > and establish our LPI->VLPI mapping.
I have tweaked the commit message.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 8 ++++
> >> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 6 ++-
> >> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> >> index 7eeb6c2a2f9c..2f750c770bf2 100644
> >> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> >> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> >> @@ -373,4 +373,12 @@ int kvm_vgic_setup_default_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm);
> >>
> >> int kvm_vgic_set_owner(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int intid, void *owner);
> >>
> >> +struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry;
> >> +
> >> +int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int irq,
> >> + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry);
> >> +
> >> +int kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int irq,
> >> + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry);
> >> +
> >> #endif /* __KVM_ARM_VGIC_H */
> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> >> index 5d5218ecd547..8388c1cc23f6 100644
> >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> >> @@ -1462,7 +1462,8 @@ int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
> >> struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
> >> container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
> >>
> >> - return 0;
> >> + return kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
> >> + &irqfd->irq_entry);
> >> }
> >> void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
> >> struct irq_bypass_producer *prod)
> >> @@ -1470,7 +1471,8 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
> >> struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
> >> container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
> >>
> >> - return;
> >> + kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
> >> + &irqfd->irq_entry);
> >> }
> >>
> >> void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> >> index c794f0cef09e..01a2889b7b7c 100644
> >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> >> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> >> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> >> +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
> >>
> >> #include "vgic.h"
> >>
> >> @@ -81,3 +82,110 @@ void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm)
> >> its_vm->nr_vpes = 0;
> >> its_vm->vpes = NULL;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> +static struct vgic_its *vgic_get_its(struct kvm *kvm,
> >> + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry)
> >> +{
> >> + struct kvm_msi msi = (struct kvm_msi) {
> >> + .address_lo = irq_entry->msi.address_lo,
> >> + .address_hi = irq_entry->msi.address_hi,
> >> + .data = irq_entry->msi.data,
> >> + .flags = irq_entry->msi.flags,
> >> + .devid = irq_entry->msi.devid,
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Get a reference on the LPI. If NULL, this is not a valid
> >> + * translation for any of our vITSs.
> >> + */
> > I don't understand the relevance of the above comment.
>
> Hmmm. The first part looks like an outdated leftover, as the ITS is not
> refcounted, and we don't deal with LPIs here.
>
I simply removed this comment.
[...]
I think the only thing left to fix on this patch is the IRQ_DISABLE_LAZY
thing on its_map_vlpi() failures, which Marc can fix post -rc1.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
From 1583497256852344721@xxx Wed Nov 08 11:31:03 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1582421821262980114
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread