2018-09-07 17:25:32

by Igor Stoppa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] freescale: ethernet: remove unnecessary unlikely()

Both WARN_ON() and WARN_ONCE() already contain an unlikely(), so it's not
necessary to wrap it into another.

Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <[email protected]>
Cc: Madalin Bucur <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c
index 65a22cd9aef2..783134f1b779 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c
@@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ static int dpaa_bman_release(const struct dpaa_bp *dpaa_bp,

err = bman_release(dpaa_bp->pool, bmb, cnt);
/* Should never occur, address anyway to avoid leaking the buffers */
- if (unlikely(WARN_ON(err)) && dpaa_bp->free_buf_cb)
+ if (WARN_ON(err) && dpaa_bp->free_buf_cb)
while (cnt-- > 0)
dpaa_bp->free_buf_cb(dpaa_bp, &bmb[cnt]);

@@ -1704,10 +1704,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *contig_fd_to_skb(const struct dpaa_priv *priv,

skb = build_skb(vaddr, dpaa_bp->size +
SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
- if (unlikely(!skb)) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "Build skb failure on Rx\n");
+ if (WARN_ONCE(!skb, "Build skb failure on Rx\n"))
goto free_buffer;
- }
WARN_ON(fd_off != priv->rx_headroom);
skb_reserve(skb, fd_off);
skb_put(skb, qm_fd_get_length(fd));
@@ -1770,7 +1768,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *sg_fd_to_skb(const struct dpaa_priv *priv,
sz = dpaa_bp->size +
SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
skb = build_skb(sg_vaddr, sz);
- if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!skb)))
+ if (WARN_ON(!skb))
goto free_buffers;

skb->ip_summed = rx_csum_offload(priv, fd);
--
2.17.1



2018-09-07 21:53:16

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] freescale: ethernet: remove unnecessary unlikely()

From: Igor Stoppa <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:23:18 +0300

> Both WARN_ON() and WARN_ONCE() already contain an unlikely(), so it's not
> necessary to wrap it into another.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <[email protected]>

Applied.