Remove unwanted parentheses around right hand side of an assignment to
make code better and more understandable.
Issue found by Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Prabakaran <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c b/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c
index a9902818ae7e..970343048b69 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c
@@ -341,8 +341,8 @@ static u16 crc16_ccitt(u8 data, u16 crc)
u16 result;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
- crc_bit15 = ((crc & BIT(15)) ? 1 : 0);
- data_bit = (data & (BIT(0) << i) ? 1 : 0);
+ crc_bit15 = (crc & BIT(15)) ? 1 : 0;
+ data_bit = data & (BIT(0) << i) ? 1 : 0;
shift_in = crc_bit15 ^ data_bit;
result = crc << 1;
--
2.17.1
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:04:45AM -0500, Madhumitha Prabakaran wrote:
> Remove unwanted parentheses around right hand side of an assignment to
> make code better and more understandable.
>
> Issue found by Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Prabakaran <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c b/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c
> index a9902818ae7e..970343048b69 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/core.c
> @@ -341,8 +341,8 @@ static u16 crc16_ccitt(u8 data, u16 crc)
> u16 result;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> - crc_bit15 = ((crc & BIT(15)) ? 1 : 0);
> - data_bit = (data & (BIT(0) << i) ? 1 : 0);
> + crc_bit15 = (crc & BIT(15)) ? 1 : 0;
> + data_bit = data & (BIT(0) << i) ? 1 : 0;
The original is obviously unhelpful, yes. And the code works correctly,
true. But my preferred format would be like this:
data_bit = (data & BIT(i)) ? 1 : 0;
Left shifting BIT() is silly. But I like the extra parentheses around
the bitwise AND operation because that's a hard precedence to remember.
regards,
dan carpenter
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 07:18:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> data_bit = (data & BIT(i)) ? 1 : 0;
I quite like the !! idiom also...
data_bit = !!(data & BIT(i));
regards,
dan carpenter
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 07:21:45PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 07:18:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > data_bit = (data & BIT(i)) ? 1 : 0;
>
> I quite like the !! idiom also...
>
> data_bit = !!(data & BIT(i));
Thanks for reviewing it.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter