Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version
in order to avoid any potential type mistakes, in particular in the
context in which this code is being used.
So, replace the following form:
sizeof(*sect_attrs) + nloaded * sizeof(sect_attrs->attrs[0]
with:
struct_size(sect_attrs, attrs, nloaded)
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
kernel/module.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 80c7c09584cf..3f3bb090fbf4 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -1492,8 +1492,7 @@ static void add_sect_attrs(struct module *mod, const struct load_info *info)
for (i = 0; i < info->hdr->e_shnum; i++)
if (!sect_empty(&info->sechdrs[i]))
nloaded++;
- size[0] = ALIGN(sizeof(*sect_attrs)
- + nloaded * sizeof(sect_attrs->attrs[0]),
+ size[0] = ALIGN(struct_size(sect_attrs, attrs, nloaded),
sizeof(sect_attrs->grp.attrs[0]));
size[1] = (nloaded + 1) * sizeof(sect_attrs->grp.attrs[0]);
sect_attrs = kzalloc(size[0] + size[1], GFP_KERNEL);
--
2.21.0
Hi Jessica,
On 6/6/19 1:05 PM, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Hi Gustavo!
>
> I see you've sent similar cleanup patches elsewhere, do you think you
> could reword your commit message to be more similar to your patch here
> for instance:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/5/856
>
> It does a *much* better job of explaining the motivation and usage of
> struct_size().
>
Sure thing. :)
I'll send v2 with that change, shortly.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
+++ Gustavo A. R. Silva [04/06/19 18:23 -0500]:
>Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version
>in order to avoid any potential type mistakes, in particular in the
>context in which this code is being used.
>
>So, replace the following form:
>
>sizeof(*sect_attrs) + nloaded * sizeof(sect_attrs->attrs[0]
>
>with:
>
>struct_size(sect_attrs, attrs, nloaded)
>
>This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
>Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Hi Gustavo!
I see you've sent similar cleanup patches elsewhere, do you think you
could reword your commit message to be more similar to your patch here
for instance:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/5/856
It does a *much* better job of explaining the motivation and usage of
struct_size().
Thank you!
Jessica
>---
> kernel/module.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
>index 80c7c09584cf..3f3bb090fbf4 100644
>--- a/kernel/module.c
>+++ b/kernel/module.c
>@@ -1492,8 +1492,7 @@ static void add_sect_attrs(struct module *mod, const struct load_info *info)
> for (i = 0; i < info->hdr->e_shnum; i++)
> if (!sect_empty(&info->sechdrs[i]))
> nloaded++;
>- size[0] = ALIGN(sizeof(*sect_attrs)
>- + nloaded * sizeof(sect_attrs->attrs[0]),
>+ size[0] = ALIGN(struct_size(sect_attrs, attrs, nloaded),
> sizeof(sect_attrs->grp.attrs[0]));
> size[1] = (nloaded + 1) * sizeof(sect_attrs->grp.attrs[0]);
> sect_attrs = kzalloc(size[0] + size[1], GFP_KERNEL);
>--
>2.21.0
>