When building with CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511 and CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511
enabled as loadable modules, we see the following warning:
warning: same module names found:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511.ko
drivers/media/i2c/adv7511.ko
Rework so the names matches the config fragment.
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <[email protected]>
---
drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
index d8ad9dad495d..b71a427a89fd 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV748X) += adv748x/
obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7604) += adv7604.o
obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7842) += adv7842.o
obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_AD9389B) += ad9389b.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511) += adv7511.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511) += video-adv7511.o
+video-adv7511-objs := adv7511.o
obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_VPX3220) += vpx3220.o
obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_VS6624) += vs6624.o
obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_BT819) += bt819.o
--
2.20.1
On 6/12/19 10:12 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> When building with CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511 and CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511
> enabled as loadable modules, we see the following warning:
>
> warning: same module names found:
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511.ko
> drivers/media/i2c/adv7511.ko
>
> Rework so the names matches the config fragment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> index d8ad9dad495d..b71a427a89fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> @@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV748X) += adv748x/
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7604) += adv7604.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7842) += adv7842.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_AD9389B) += ad9389b.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511) += adv7511.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511) += video-adv7511.o
> +video-adv7511-objs := adv7511.o
I prefer adv7511-v4l2 as the new name. 'video' is too vague and can easily be
confused with drivers/video.
I think it is better to rename adv7511.c to adv7511-v4l2.c and add a comment
at the top of that source explaining why it is named like that.
Regards,
Hans
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_VPX3220) += vpx3220.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_VS6624) += vs6624.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_BT819) += bt819.o
>