When the application calls VIDIOC_DQBUF with the DMABUF memory type, the
v4l2_buffer structure (or v4l2_plane structures) are filled with DMA-buf
file descriptors. However, the current documentation does not explain
whether those are new file descriptors referring to the same DMA-bufs or
just the same integers as passed to VIDIOC_QBUF back in time. Clarify
the documentation that it's the latter.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst
index dbf7b445a27b..407302d80684 100644
--- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst
+++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst
@@ -139,6 +139,14 @@ may continue as normal, but should be aware that data in the dequeued
buffer might be corrupted. When using the multi-planar API, the planes
array must be passed in as well.
+If the application sets the ``memory`` field to ``V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF`` to
+dequeue a :ref:`DMABUF <dmabuf>` buffer, the driver fills the ``m.fd`` field
+with a file descriptor numerically the same as the one given to ``VIDIOC_QBUF``
+when the buffer was enqueued. No new file descriptor is created at dequeue time
+and the value is only for the application convenience. When the multi-planar
+API is used the ``m.fd`` fields of the passed array of struct
+:c:type:`v4l2_plane` are filled instead.
+
By default ``VIDIOC_DQBUF`` blocks when no buffer is in the outgoing
queue. When the ``O_NONBLOCK`` flag was given to the
:ref:`open() <func-open>` function, ``VIDIOC_DQBUF`` returns
--
2.22.0.rc2.383.gf4fbbf30c2-goog
Hi,
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 18:36 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> When the application calls VIDIOC_DQBUF with the DMABUF memory type, the
> v4l2_buffer structure (or v4l2_plane structures) are filled with DMA-buf
> file descriptors. However, the current documentation does not explain
> whether those are new file descriptors referring to the same DMA-bufs or
> just the same integers as passed to VIDIOC_QBUF back in time. Clarify
> the documentation that it's the latter.
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]>
Cheers,
Paul
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst
> index dbf7b445a27b..407302d80684 100644
> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst
> @@ -139,6 +139,14 @@ may continue as normal, but should be aware that data in the dequeued
> buffer might be corrupted. When using the multi-planar API, the planes
> array must be passed in as well.
>
> +If the application sets the ``memory`` field to ``V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF`` to
> +dequeue a :ref:`DMABUF <dmabuf>` buffer, the driver fills the ``m.fd`` field
> +with a file descriptor numerically the same as the one given to ``VIDIOC_QBUF``
> +when the buffer was enqueued. No new file descriptor is created at dequeue time
> +and the value is only for the application convenience. When the multi-planar
> +API is used the ``m.fd`` fields of the passed array of struct
> +:c:type:`v4l2_plane` are filled instead.
> +
> By default ``VIDIOC_DQBUF`` blocks when no buffer is in the outgoing
> queue. When the ``O_NONBLOCK`` flag was given to the
> :ref:`open() <func-open>` function, ``VIDIOC_DQBUF`` returns
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 6:36 PM Tomasz Figa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> When the application calls VIDIOC_DQBUF with the DMABUF memory type, the
> v4l2_buffer structure (or v4l2_plane structures) are filled with DMA-buf
> file descriptors. However, the current documentation does not explain
> whether those are new file descriptors referring to the same DMA-bufs or
> just the same integers as passed to VIDIOC_QBUF back in time. Clarify
> the documentation that it's the latter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <[email protected]>
That's a welcome precision indeed.
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst
> index dbf7b445a27b..407302d80684 100644
> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-qbuf.rst
> @@ -139,6 +139,14 @@ may continue as normal, but should be aware that data in the dequeued
> buffer might be corrupted. When using the multi-planar API, the planes
> array must be passed in as well.
>
> +If the application sets the ``memory`` field to ``V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF`` to
> +dequeue a :ref:`DMABUF <dmabuf>` buffer, the driver fills the ``m.fd`` field
> +with a file descriptor numerically the same as the one given to ``VIDIOC_QBUF``
> +when the buffer was enqueued. No new file descriptor is created at dequeue time
> +and the value is only for the application convenience. When the multi-planar
> +API is used the ``m.fd`` fields of the passed array of struct
> +:c:type:`v4l2_plane` are filled instead.
> +
> By default ``VIDIOC_DQBUF`` blocks when no buffer is in the outgoing
> queue. When the ``O_NONBLOCK`` flag was given to the
> :ref:`open() <func-open>` function, ``VIDIOC_DQBUF`` returns
> --
> 2.22.0.rc2.383.gf4fbbf30c2-goog
>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 06:36:48PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> When the application calls VIDIOC_DQBUF with the DMABUF memory type, the
> v4l2_buffer structure (or v4l2_plane structures) are filled with DMA-buf
> file descriptors. However, the current documentation does not explain
> whether those are new file descriptors referring to the same DMA-bufs or
> just the same integers as passed to VIDIOC_QBUF back in time. Clarify
> the documentation that it's the latter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
--
Sakari Ailus
[email protected]