2019-11-25 07:30:05

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

Hi Dave,

Commits

5940c5bf6504 ("selftests, bpftool: Skip the build test if not in tree")
31f8b8295bb8 ("selftests, bpftool: Set EXIT trap after usage function")
a89b2cbf71d6 ("tools, bpf: Fix build for 'make -s tools/bpf O=<dir>'")
a0f17cc6665c ("tools, bpftool: Fix warning on ignored return value for 'read'")
5d946c5abbaf ("xsk: Fix xsk_poll()'s return type")

are missing a Signed-off-by from their committers.

Presumably because the bpf-next tree has been rebased before asking you
to merge it. :-(

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2019-11-25 07:37:05

by Daniel Borkmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

On 11/25/19 8:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Commits
>
> 5940c5bf6504 ("selftests, bpftool: Skip the build test if not in tree")
> 31f8b8295bb8 ("selftests, bpftool: Set EXIT trap after usage function")
> a89b2cbf71d6 ("tools, bpf: Fix build for 'make -s tools/bpf O=<dir>'")
> a0f17cc6665c ("tools, bpftool: Fix warning on ignored return value for 'read'")
> 5d946c5abbaf ("xsk: Fix xsk_poll()'s return type")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committers.
>
> Presumably because the bpf-next tree has been rebased before asking you
> to merge it. :-(

Yep, the tree has been rebased onto net-next in order to avoid an ugly merge
conflict. My maintainer SOB is still there fwiw, but I guess in this situation
would probably have been good add both of ours. Sorry for the trouble.

Thanks,
Daniel