2019-12-20 01:57:26

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

Now, when ci_hdrc_tegra kernel module is loaded, the phy_tegra_usb module
is loaded too regardless of kernel's configuration. Previously this
problem was masked because Tegra's EHCI driver is usually enabled in
kernel's config and thus PHY driver was getting loaded because of it, but
now I was making some more thorough testing and noticed that PHY's module
isn't getting auto-loaded without the host driver.

Note that ChipIdea's driver doesn't use any of the exported functions of
phy_tegra_usb module and thus the module needs to be requested explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
index ae850b3fddf2..d53db520e209 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config USB_CHIPIDEA
select RESET_CONTROLLER
select USB_ULPI_BUS
select USB_ROLE_SWITCH
+ select USB_TEGRA_PHY if ARCH_TEGRA
help
Say Y here if your system has a dual role high speed USB
controller based on ChipIdea silicon IP. It supports:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
index 7455df0ede49..8bc11100245d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
@@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct tegra_udc *udc;
int err;

+ if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
+ err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
udc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*udc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!udc)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.24.0


2019-12-20 03:58:49

by Peter Chen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Now, when ci_hdrc_tegra kernel module is loaded, the phy_tegra_usb module
> is loaded too regardless of kernel's configuration. Previously this
> problem was masked because Tegra's EHCI driver is usually enabled in
> kernel's config and thus PHY driver was getting loaded because of it, but
> now I was making some more thorough testing and noticed that PHY's module
> isn't getting auto-loaded without the host driver.
>
> Note that ChipIdea's driver doesn't use any of the exported functions of
> phy_tegra_usb module and thus the module needs to be requested explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> index ae850b3fddf2..d53db520e209 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config USB_CHIPIDEA
> select RESET_CONTROLLER
> select USB_ULPI_BUS
> select USB_ROLE_SWITCH
> + select USB_TEGRA_PHY if ARCH_TEGRA
> help
> Say Y here if your system has a dual role high speed USB
> controller based on ChipIdea silicon IP. It supports:
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> index 7455df0ede49..8bc11100245d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct tegra_udc *udc;
> int err;
>
> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +

Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
after calling below:

udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);

Peter
> udc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*udc), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!udc)
> return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.24.0
>

--

Thanks,
Peter Chen

2019-12-20 04:33:14

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Now, when ci_hdrc_tegra kernel module is loaded, the phy_tegra_usb module
>> is loaded too regardless of kernel's configuration. Previously this
>> problem was masked because Tegra's EHCI driver is usually enabled in
>> kernel's config and thus PHY driver was getting loaded because of it, but
>> now I was making some more thorough testing and noticed that PHY's module
>> isn't getting auto-loaded without the host driver.
>>
>> Note that ChipIdea's driver doesn't use any of the exported functions of
>> phy_tegra_usb module and thus the module needs to be requested explicitly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
>> index ae850b3fddf2..d53db520e209 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config USB_CHIPIDEA
>> select RESET_CONTROLLER
>> select USB_ULPI_BUS
>> select USB_ROLE_SWITCH
>> + select USB_TEGRA_PHY if ARCH_TEGRA
>> help
>> Say Y here if your system has a dual role high speed USB
>> controller based on ChipIdea silicon IP. It supports:
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>> index 7455df0ede49..8bc11100245d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
>> int err;
>>
>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>
> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
> get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
> after calling below:
>
> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);

It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.

So if you'll do:

# rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb;
# modprobe ci_hdrc_tegra
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra

After this patch:

# rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb;
# modprobe ci_hdrc_tegra
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
Module Size Used by
phy_tegra_usb 20480 1
ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra

2019-12-23 06:40:53

by Peter Chen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

On 19-12-20 07:31:08, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
> > On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> Now, when ci_hdrc_tegra kernel module is loaded, the phy_tegra_usb module
> >> is loaded too regardless of kernel's configuration. Previously this
> >> problem was masked because Tegra's EHCI driver is usually enabled in
> >> kernel's config and thus PHY driver was getting loaded because of it, but
> >> now I was making some more thorough testing and noticed that PHY's module
> >> isn't getting auto-loaded without the host driver.
> >>
> >> Note that ChipIdea's driver doesn't use any of the exported functions of
> >> phy_tegra_usb module and thus the module needs to be requested explicitly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig | 1 +
> >> drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c | 6 ++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> >> index ae850b3fddf2..d53db520e209 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> >> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config USB_CHIPIDEA
> >> select RESET_CONTROLLER
> >> select USB_ULPI_BUS
> >> select USB_ROLE_SWITCH
> >> + select USB_TEGRA_PHY if ARCH_TEGRA
> >> help
> >> Say Y here if your system has a dual role high speed USB
> >> controller based on ChipIdea silicon IP. It supports:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >> index 7455df0ede49..8bc11100245d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> struct tegra_udc *udc;
> >> int err;
> >>
> >> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
> >> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
> >> + if (err)
> >> + return err;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >
> > Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
> > get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
> > after calling below:
> >
> > udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
>
> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
>
> So if you'll do:
>
> # rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb;
> # modprobe ci_hdrc_tegra
> # lsmod
> Module Size Used by
> ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
> ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra
>
> After this patch:
>
> # rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb;
> # modprobe ci_hdrc_tegra
> # lsmod
> Module Size Used by
> Module Size Used by
> phy_tegra_usb 20480 1
> ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
> ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra

I wonder why the driver needs such dependency? If there are two phy
drivers could work with this controller driver, you may request two
modules. Doesn't such dependency should be done by the board
level script? Do you know are there any other drivers do such things?

--

Thanks,
Peter Chen

2019-12-23 17:24:50

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

23.12.2019 09:40, Peter Chen пишет:
> On 19-12-20 07:31:08, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
>>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> Now, when ci_hdrc_tegra kernel module is loaded, the phy_tegra_usb module
>>>> is loaded too regardless of kernel's configuration. Previously this
>>>> problem was masked because Tegra's EHCI driver is usually enabled in
>>>> kernel's config and thus PHY driver was getting loaded because of it, but
>>>> now I was making some more thorough testing and noticed that PHY's module
>>>> isn't getting auto-loaded without the host driver.
>>>>
>>>> Note that ChipIdea's driver doesn't use any of the exported functions of
>>>> phy_tegra_usb module and thus the module needs to be requested explicitly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>> drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c | 6 ++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
>>>> index ae850b3fddf2..d53db520e209 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config USB_CHIPIDEA
>>>> select RESET_CONTROLLER
>>>> select USB_ULPI_BUS
>>>> select USB_ROLE_SWITCH
>>>> + select USB_TEGRA_PHY if ARCH_TEGRA
>>>> help
>>>> Say Y here if your system has a dual role high speed USB
>>>> controller based on ChipIdea silicon IP. It supports:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>> index 7455df0ede49..8bc11100245d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
>>>> int err;
>>>>
>>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
>>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + return err;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
>>> get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
>>> after calling below:
>>>
>>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
>>
>> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
>>
>> So if you'll do:
>>
>> # rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb;
>> # modprobe ci_hdrc_tegra
>> # lsmod
>> Module Size Used by
>> ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
>> ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra
>>
>> After this patch:
>>
>> # rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb;
>> # modprobe ci_hdrc_tegra
>> # lsmod
>> Module Size Used by
>> Module Size Used by
>> phy_tegra_usb 20480 1
>> ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
>> ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra
>
> I wonder why the driver needs such dependency? If there are two phy
> drivers could work with this controller driver, you may request two
> modules.

Well, if somebody wants to use some PHY driver other than the upstream's
standard one, then that person could simply load the custom driver
module first, such that it will bind to the PHY's device first.

It is also possible to manually unbind the standard driver from PHY's
device and then bind whatever driver you want.

> Doesn't such dependency should be done by the board
> level script?

This patch only improves the default behaviour that is common for all
NVIDIA Tegra boards, it doesn't prevent from doing any special
customizations.

Perhaps the Kconfig change could be dropped from this patch in order to
provide a bit more flexibility in regards to kernel's configuration, but
I'm very doubtful that realistically anyone would want to replace the
default driver with anything else on Tegra. The Kconfig change also puts
ChipIdea's UDC driver in line with the Tegra's EHCI driver that selects
USB_TEGRA_PHY, please see drivers/usb/host/Kconfig.

> Do you know are there any other drivers do such things?

I don't think that any of the USB host drivers are currently doing such
things, but in general there are quite a lot of drivers in kernel that
are using request_module [1].

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/ident/request_module

Please note that drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c uses exported symbols
from usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c and that is why the EHCI driver doesn't
need to explicitly load the phy_tegra_usb module, the load happens
automatically because of the missing symbols.

Also, please note that it is possible to squash the Tegra EHCI driver
into ci_hdrc_tegra.c and then the explicit dependency on the
phy_tegra_usb won't be needed anymore since it will be replaced with an
implicit dependency. We (me and Peter Geis) already had some
experimental patches that do the successful squashing of the drivers,
but looks like Peter got sidetracked for a more important things for
now, we'll probably return to that work later on.

2019-12-23 21:33:35

by Michał Mirosław

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:31:08AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
> > On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
[...]
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> struct tegra_udc *udc;
> >> int err;
> >>
> >> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
> >> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
> >> + if (err)
> >> + return err;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >
> > Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
> > get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
> > after calling below:
> >
> > udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
>
> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.

How are other driver modules autoloaded? Isn't there an appropriate
MODALIAS or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in there?

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław

2019-12-24 02:55:21

by Peter Chen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies


>
> 23.12.2019 09:40, Peter Chen пишет:
> > On 19-12-20 07:31:08, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
> >>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>> Now, when ci_hdrc_tegra kernel module is loaded, the phy_tegra_usb
> >>>> module is loaded too regardless of kernel's configuration.
> >>>> Previously this problem was masked because Tegra's EHCI driver is
> >>>> usually enabled in kernel's config and thus PHY driver was getting
> >>>> loaded because of it, but now I was making some more thorough
> >>>> testing and noticed that PHY's module isn't getting auto-loaded without the
> host driver.
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that ChipIdea's driver doesn't use any of the exported
> >>>> functions of phy_tegra_usb module and thus the module needs to be
> requested explicitly.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig | 1 +
> >>>> drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c | 6 ++++++
> >>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> >>>> b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig index ae850b3fddf2..d53db520e209
> >>>> 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> >>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config USB_CHIPIDEA
> >>>> select RESET_CONTROLLER
> >>>> select USB_ULPI_BUS
> >>>> select USB_ROLE_SWITCH
> >>>> + select USB_TEGRA_PHY if ARCH_TEGRA
> >>>> help
> >>>> Say Y here if your system has a dual role high speed USB
> >>>> controller based on ChipIdea silicon IP. It supports:
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>> b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>> index 7455df0ede49..8bc11100245d 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
> >>>> int err;
> >>>>
> >>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
> >>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
> >>>> + if (err)
> >>>> + return err;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't get USB
> >>> PHY, it should return error. What's the return value after calling
> >>> below:
> >>>
> >>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy",
> >>> 0);
> >>
> >> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
> >>
> >> So if you'll do:
> >>
> >> # rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb; # modprobe
> >> ci_hdrc_tegra # lsmod
> >> Module Size Used by
> >> ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
> >> ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra
> >>
> >> After this patch:
> >>
> >> # rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb; # modprobe
> >> ci_hdrc_tegra # lsmod
> >> Module Size Used by
> >> Module Size Used by
> >> phy_tegra_usb 20480 1
> >> ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
> >> ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra
> >
> > I wonder why the driver needs such dependency? If there are two phy
> > drivers could work with this controller driver, you may request two
> > modules.
>
> Well, if somebody wants to use some PHY driver other than the upstream's
> standard one, then that person could simply load the custom driver module first,
> such that it will bind to the PHY's device first.
>
> It is also possible to manually unbind the standard driver from PHY's device and
> then bind whatever driver you want.
>
> > Doesn't such dependency should be done by the board level script?
>
> This patch only improves the default behaviour that is common for all NVIDIA Tegra
> boards, it doesn't prevent from doing any special customizations.
>
> Perhaps the Kconfig change could be dropped from this patch in order to provide a
> bit more flexibility in regards to kernel's configuration, but I'm very doubtful that
> realistically anyone would want to replace the default driver with anything else on
> Tegra. The Kconfig change also puts ChipIdea's UDC driver in line with the Tegra's
> EHCI driver that selects USB_TEGRA_PHY, please see drivers/usb/host/Kconfig.
>
> > Do you know are there any other drivers do such things?
>
> I don't think that any of the USB host drivers are currently doing such things, but in
> general there are quite a lot of drivers in kernel that are using request_module [1].
>
> [1]
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.c
> om%2Flinux%2Flatest%2Fident%2Frequest_module&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpete
> r.chen%40nxp.com%7Ca153b9e4d81044cde3c108d787ccdcb9%7C686ea1d3bc2b
> 4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637127186257612269&amp;sdata=xOVnn
> bVGRVhypbiMWpt2MUfcYayAl4ywpCa7xOAQ1vk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> Please note that drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c uses exported symbols from
> usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c and that is why the EHCI driver doesn't need to explicitly
> load the phy_tegra_usb module, the load happens automatically because of the
> missing symbols.
>
> Also, please note that it is possible to squash the Tegra EHCI driver into
> ci_hdrc_tegra.c and then the explicit dependency on the phy_tegra_usb won't be
> needed anymore since it will be replaced with an implicit dependency. We (me and
> Peter Geis) already had some experimental patches that do the successful
> squashing of the drivers, but looks like Peter got sidetracked for a more important
> things for now, we'll probably return to that work later on.

Hi Dmitry,

Thanks for explaining it. In fact, your case is very common for USB since PHY driver
and controller driver are two independent drivers. If you have no other ways
to fix this dependency issue, it is ok to add it at driver.

Peter

2019-12-24 04:22:01

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

24.12.2019 00:32, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:31:08AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
>>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> [...]
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
>>>> int err;
>>>>
>>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
>>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + return err;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
>>> get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
>>> after calling below:
>>>
>>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
>>
>> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
>
> How are other driver modules autoloaded? Isn't there an appropriate
> MODALIAS or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in there?

Hello Michał,

The phy_tegra_usb module is fine by itself, it's getting autoloaded.

The problem is that ci_hdrc_tegra module depends on the phy_tegra_usb
module and thus the PHY module should be loaded before the CI module,
otherwise CI driver fails with the EPROBE_DEFER.

2019-12-24 04:22:31

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

24.12.2019 05:54, Peter Chen пишет:
>
>>
>> 23.12.2019 09:40, Peter Chen пишет:
>>> On 19-12-20 07:31:08, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
>>>>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>> Now, when ci_hdrc_tegra kernel module is loaded, the phy_tegra_usb
>>>>>> module is loaded too regardless of kernel's configuration.
>>>>>> Previously this problem was masked because Tegra's EHCI driver is
>>>>>> usually enabled in kernel's config and thus PHY driver was getting
>>>>>> loaded because of it, but now I was making some more thorough
>>>>>> testing and noticed that PHY's module isn't getting auto-loaded without the
>> host driver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that ChipIdea's driver doesn't use any of the exported
>>>>>> functions of phy_tegra_usb module and thus the module needs to be
>> requested explicitly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>>>> drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c | 6 ++++++
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
>>>>>> b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig index ae850b3fddf2..d53db520e209
>>>>>> 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
>>>>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config USB_CHIPIDEA
>>>>>> select RESET_CONTROLLER
>>>>>> select USB_ULPI_BUS
>>>>>> select USB_ROLE_SWITCH
>>>>>> + select USB_TEGRA_PHY if ARCH_TEGRA
>>>>>> help
>>>>>> Say Y here if your system has a dual role high speed USB
>>>>>> controller based on ChipIdea silicon IP. It supports:
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>> index 7455df0ede49..8bc11100245d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>>>>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
>>>>>> int err;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
>>>>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
>>>>>> + if (err)
>>>>>> + return err;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't get USB
>>>>> PHY, it should return error. What's the return value after calling
>>>>> below:
>>>>>
>>>>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy",
>>>>> 0);
>>>>
>>>> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
>>>>
>>>> So if you'll do:
>>>>
>>>> # rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb; # modprobe
>>>> ci_hdrc_tegra # lsmod
>>>> Module Size Used by
>>>> ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
>>>> ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra
>>>>
>>>> After this patch:
>>>>
>>>> # rmmod ci_hdrc_tegra; rmmod ci_hdrc; rmmod phy_tegra_usb; # modprobe
>>>> ci_hdrc_tegra # lsmod
>>>> Module Size Used by
>>>> Module Size Used by
>>>> phy_tegra_usb 20480 1
>>>> ci_hdrc_tegra 16384 0
>>>> ci_hdrc 45056 1 ci_hdrc_tegra
>>>
>>> I wonder why the driver needs such dependency? If there are two phy
>>> drivers could work with this controller driver, you may request two
>>> modules.
>>
>> Well, if somebody wants to use some PHY driver other than the upstream's
>> standard one, then that person could simply load the custom driver module first,
>> such that it will bind to the PHY's device first.
>>
>> It is also possible to manually unbind the standard driver from PHY's device and
>> then bind whatever driver you want.
>>
>>> Doesn't such dependency should be done by the board level script?
>>
>> This patch only improves the default behaviour that is common for all NVIDIA Tegra
>> boards, it doesn't prevent from doing any special customizations.
>>
>> Perhaps the Kconfig change could be dropped from this patch in order to provide a
>> bit more flexibility in regards to kernel's configuration, but I'm very doubtful that
>> realistically anyone would want to replace the default driver with anything else on
>> Tegra. The Kconfig change also puts ChipIdea's UDC driver in line with the Tegra's
>> EHCI driver that selects USB_TEGRA_PHY, please see drivers/usb/host/Kconfig.
>>
>>> Do you know are there any other drivers do such things?
>>
>> I don't think that any of the USB host drivers are currently doing such things, but in
>> general there are quite a lot of drivers in kernel that are using request_module [1].
>>
>> [1]
>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.c
>> om%2Flinux%2Flatest%2Fident%2Frequest_module&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpete
>> r.chen%40nxp.com%7Ca153b9e4d81044cde3c108d787ccdcb9%7C686ea1d3bc2b
>> 4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637127186257612269&amp;sdata=xOVnn
>> bVGRVhypbiMWpt2MUfcYayAl4ywpCa7xOAQ1vk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>
>> Please note that drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c uses exported symbols from
>> usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c and that is why the EHCI driver doesn't need to explicitly
>> load the phy_tegra_usb module, the load happens automatically because of the
>> missing symbols.
>>
>> Also, please note that it is possible to squash the Tegra EHCI driver into
>> ci_hdrc_tegra.c and then the explicit dependency on the phy_tegra_usb won't be
>> needed anymore since it will be replaced with an implicit dependency. We (me and
>> Peter Geis) already had some experimental patches that do the successful
>> squashing of the drivers, but looks like Peter got sidetracked for a more important
>> things for now, we'll probably return to that work later on.
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thanks for explaining it. In fact, your case is very common for USB since PHY driver
> and controller driver are two independent drivers. If you have no other ways
> to fix this dependency issue, it is ok to add it at driver.

Hello Peter,

For now I'm not aware of any alternatives to this patch, thanks.

BTW, I'll make a v3 of this series because found more things that could
be improved in the Tegra's PHY driver.

2019-12-30 21:06:45

by Michał Mirosław

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 07:21:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 24.12.2019 00:32, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:31:08AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
> >>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > [...]
> >>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
> >>>> int err;
> >>>>
> >>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
> >>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
> >>>> + if (err)
> >>>> + return err;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
> >>> get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
> >>> after calling below:
> >>>
> >>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
> >>
> >> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
> >
> > How are other driver modules autoloaded? Isn't there an appropriate
> > MODALIAS or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in there?
>
> Hello Michał,
>
> The phy_tegra_usb module is fine by itself, it's getting autoloaded.
>
> The problem is that ci_hdrc_tegra module depends on the phy_tegra_usb
> module and thus the PHY module should be loaded before the CI module,
> otherwise CI driver fails with the EPROBE_DEFER.

Why, then, is CI driver not being probed again after PHY driver loads?
EPROBE_DEFER is what should cause driver core to re-probe a device after
other devices appear (PHY in this case).

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław

2020-01-02 15:18:43

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

31.12.2019 00:02, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 07:21:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 24.12.2019 00:32, Michał Mirosław пишет:
>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:31:08AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
>>>>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
>>>>>> int err;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
>>>>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
>>>>>> + if (err)
>>>>>> + return err;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
>>>>> get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
>>>>> after calling below:
>>>>>
>>>>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
>>>>
>>>> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
>>>
>>> How are other driver modules autoloaded? Isn't there an appropriate
>>> MODALIAS or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in there?
>>
>> Hello Michał,
>>
>> The phy_tegra_usb module is fine by itself, it's getting autoloaded.
>>
>> The problem is that ci_hdrc_tegra module depends on the phy_tegra_usb
>> module and thus the PHY module should be loaded before the CI module,
>> otherwise CI driver fails with the EPROBE_DEFER.
>
> Why, then, is CI driver not being probed again after PHY driver loads?
> EPROBE_DEFER is what should cause driver core to re-probe a device after
> other devices appear (PHY in this case).

CI driver is getting re-probed just fine if PHY's driver module is
loaded manually after loading the CI's module. This patch removes this
necessity to manually load PHY's module.

This is just a minor convenience change that brings the CI's driver
loading behaviour on par with the behaviour of loading Tegra's EHCI
driver module.

2020-01-03 07:26:34

by Michał Mirosław

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:17:47PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 31.12.2019 00:02, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> > On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 07:21:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 24.12.2019 00:32, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:31:08AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
> >>>>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
> >>>>>> int err;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
> >>>>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
> >>>>>> + if (err)
> >>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
> >>>>> get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
> >>>>> after calling below:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
> >>>>
> >>>> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
> >>>
> >>> How are other driver modules autoloaded? Isn't there an appropriate
> >>> MODALIAS or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in there?
> >>
> >> Hello Michał,
> >>
> >> The phy_tegra_usb module is fine by itself, it's getting autoloaded.
> >>
> >> The problem is that ci_hdrc_tegra module depends on the phy_tegra_usb
> >> module and thus the PHY module should be loaded before the CI module,
> >> otherwise CI driver fails with the EPROBE_DEFER.
> >
> > Why, then, is CI driver not being probed again after PHY driver loads?
> > EPROBE_DEFER is what should cause driver core to re-probe a device after
> > other devices appear (PHY in this case).
>
> CI driver is getting re-probed just fine if PHY's driver module is
> loaded manually after loading the CI's module. This patch removes this
> necessity to manually load PHY's module.
>
> This is just a minor convenience change that brings the CI's driver
> loading behaviour on par with the behaviour of loading Tegra's EHCI
> driver module.

I fully understand the goal, but what I'm missing is that why this
doesn't work out of the box? If the PHY module is autoloaded, and so is
CI driver, and (as I understand) the driver's probe() correctly returns
EPROBE_DEFER when PHY is not probed yet, then I guess that means bug
somewhere else and the patch just covers it up.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław

2020-01-03 23:19:59

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

03.01.2020 10:25, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:17:47PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 31.12.2019 00:02, Michał Mirosław пишет:
>>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 07:21:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 24.12.2019 00:32, Michał Mirosław пишет:
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:31:08AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
>>>>>>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
>>>>>>>> int err;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
>>>>>>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
>>>>>>>> + if (err)
>>>>>>>> + return err;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
>>>>>>> get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
>>>>>>> after calling below:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
>>>>>
>>>>> How are other driver modules autoloaded? Isn't there an appropriate
>>>>> MODALIAS or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in there?
>>>>
>>>> Hello Michał,
>>>>
>>>> The phy_tegra_usb module is fine by itself, it's getting autoloaded.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that ci_hdrc_tegra module depends on the phy_tegra_usb
>>>> module and thus the PHY module should be loaded before the CI module,
>>>> otherwise CI driver fails with the EPROBE_DEFER.
>>>
>>> Why, then, is CI driver not being probed again after PHY driver loads?
>>> EPROBE_DEFER is what should cause driver core to re-probe a device after
>>> other devices appear (PHY in this case).
>>
>> CI driver is getting re-probed just fine if PHY's driver module is
>> loaded manually after loading the CI's module. This patch removes this
>> necessity to manually load PHY's module.
>>
>> This is just a minor convenience change that brings the CI's driver
>> loading behaviour on par with the behaviour of loading Tegra's EHCI
>> driver module.
>
> I fully understand the goal, but what I'm missing is that why this
> doesn't work out of the box? If the PHY module is autoloaded, and so is
> CI driver, and (as I understand) the driver's probe() correctly returns
> EPROBE_DEFER when PHY is not probed yet, then I guess that means bug
> somewhere else and the patch just covers it up.

It works out of the box, but it also could work a bit better in a case
of manually reloading modules. Perhaps it should be possible to derive
module dependencies from the Kconfig dependencies, apparently kernel
doesn't support it yet or maybe there is some reason why it can't be done.

2020-01-04 11:02:47

by Michał Mirosław

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 02:19:01AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 03.01.2020 10:25, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:17:47PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 31.12.2019 00:02, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 07:21:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>> 24.12.2019 00:32, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:31:08AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>>>> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
> >>>>>>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >>>>>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
> >>>>>>>> int err;
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
> >>>>>>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
> >>>>>>>> + if (err)
> >>>>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
> >>>>>>> get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
> >>>>>>> after calling below:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How are other driver modules autoloaded? Isn't there an appropriate
> >>>>> MODALIAS or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in there?
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello Michał,
> >>>>
> >>>> The phy_tegra_usb module is fine by itself, it's getting autoloaded.
> >>>>
> >>>> The problem is that ci_hdrc_tegra module depends on the phy_tegra_usb
> >>>> module and thus the PHY module should be loaded before the CI module,
> >>>> otherwise CI driver fails with the EPROBE_DEFER.
> >>>
> >>> Why, then, is CI driver not being probed again after PHY driver loads?
> >>> EPROBE_DEFER is what should cause driver core to re-probe a device after
> >>> other devices appear (PHY in this case).
> >>
> >> CI driver is getting re-probed just fine if PHY's driver module is
> >> loaded manually after loading the CI's module. This patch removes this
> >> necessity to manually load PHY's module.
> >>
> >> This is just a minor convenience change that brings the CI's driver
> >> loading behaviour on par with the behaviour of loading Tegra's EHCI
> >> driver module.
> >
> > I fully understand the goal, but what I'm missing is that why this
> > doesn't work out of the box? If the PHY module is autoloaded, and so is
> > CI driver, and (as I understand) the driver's probe() correctly returns
> > EPROBE_DEFER when PHY is not probed yet, then I guess that means bug
> > somewhere else and the patch just covers it up.
>
> It works out of the box, but it also could work a bit better in a case
> of manually reloading modules. Perhaps it should be possible to derive
> module dependencies from the Kconfig dependencies, apparently kernel
> doesn't support it yet or maybe there is some reason why it can't be done.

Kconfig change I'm ok with as it simplifies kernel configuration.
The request_module() is something I would advise against, because if I
do manual module loading, I usually don't want modules loaded
automatically.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław

2020-01-05 00:45:55

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] usb: chipidea: tegra: Add USB_TEGRA_PHY module to driver's dependencies

04.01.2020 14:01, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 02:19:01AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 03.01.2020 10:25, Michał Mirosław пишет:
>>> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:17:47PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 31.12.2019 00:02, Michał Mirosław пишет:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 07:21:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>> 24.12.2019 00:32, Michał Mirosław пишет:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:31:08AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>> 20.12.2019 06:56, Peter Chen пишет:
>>>>>>>>> On 19-12-20 04:52:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>>>>> struct tegra_udc *udc;
>>>>>>>>>> int err;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_USB_TEGRA_PHY)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + err = request_module("phy_tegra_usb");
>>>>>>>>>> + if (err)
>>>>>>>>>> + return err;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why you do this dependency, if this controller driver can't
>>>>>>>>> get USB PHY, it should return error. What's the return value
>>>>>>>>> after calling below:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> udc->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy", 0);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It returns -EPROBE_DEFER when phy_tegra_usb isn't loaded.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How are other driver modules autoloaded? Isn't there an appropriate
>>>>>>> MODALIAS or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in there?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Michał,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The phy_tegra_usb module is fine by itself, it's getting autoloaded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is that ci_hdrc_tegra module depends on the phy_tegra_usb
>>>>>> module and thus the PHY module should be loaded before the CI module,
>>>>>> otherwise CI driver fails with the EPROBE_DEFER.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why, then, is CI driver not being probed again after PHY driver loads?
>>>>> EPROBE_DEFER is what should cause driver core to re-probe a device after
>>>>> other devices appear (PHY in this case).
>>>>
>>>> CI driver is getting re-probed just fine if PHY's driver module is
>>>> loaded manually after loading the CI's module. This patch removes this
>>>> necessity to manually load PHY's module.
>>>>
>>>> This is just a minor convenience change that brings the CI's driver
>>>> loading behaviour on par with the behaviour of loading Tegra's EHCI
>>>> driver module.
>>>
>>> I fully understand the goal, but what I'm missing is that why this
>>> doesn't work out of the box? If the PHY module is autoloaded, and so is
>>> CI driver, and (as I understand) the driver's probe() correctly returns
>>> EPROBE_DEFER when PHY is not probed yet, then I guess that means bug
>>> somewhere else and the patch just covers it up.
>>
>> It works out of the box, but it also could work a bit better in a case
>> of manually reloading modules. Perhaps it should be possible to derive
>> module dependencies from the Kconfig dependencies, apparently kernel
>> doesn't support it yet or maybe there is some reason why it can't be done.
>
> Kconfig change I'm ok with as it simplifies kernel configuration.
> The request_module() is something I would advise against, because if I
> do manual module loading, I usually don't want modules loaded
> automatically.

Okay, I'll drop the request_module since it raises a bit too many
questions and since it's an optional change that won't be needed once
Tegra EHCI driver will be squashed into CI.