`cat /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/regulator_summary` ends on a deadlock
when you have a voltage controlled regulator (vctrl).
The problem is that the vctrl_get_voltage() and vctrl_set_voltage() calls the
regulator_get_voltage() and regulator_set_voltage() and that will try to lock
again the dependent regulators (the regulator supplying the control voltage).
Fix the issue by exporting the unlocked version of the regulator_get_voltage()
and regulator_set_voltage() API so drivers that need it, like the voltage
controlled regulator driver can use it.
Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Reported-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 ++
drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 03d79fee2987..e7d167ce326c 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3470,6 +3470,7 @@ int regulator_set_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV,
out:
return ret;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_set_voltage_rdev);
static int regulator_limit_voltage_step(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
int *current_uV, int *min_uV)
@@ -4034,6 +4035,7 @@ int regulator_get_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
return ret;
return ret - rdev->constraints->uV_offset;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_get_voltage_rdev);
/**
* regulator_get_voltage - get regulator output voltage
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
index 9a9ee8188109..cbadb1c99679 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
@@ -11,10 +11,13 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/coupler.h>
#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
#include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
+#include "internal.h"
+
struct vctrl_voltage_range {
int min_uV;
int max_uV;
@@ -79,7 +82,7 @@ static int vctrl_calc_output_voltage(struct vctrl_data *vctrl, int ctrl_uV)
static int vctrl_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
struct vctrl_data *vctrl = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
- int ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage(vctrl->ctrl_reg);
+ int ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(vctrl->ctrl_reg->rdev);
return vctrl_calc_output_voltage(vctrl, ctrl_uV);
}
@@ -90,16 +93,16 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
{
struct vctrl_data *vctrl = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
struct regulator *ctrl_reg = vctrl->ctrl_reg;
- int orig_ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage(ctrl_reg);
+ int orig_ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev);
int uV = vctrl_calc_output_voltage(vctrl, orig_ctrl_uV);
int ret;
if (req_min_uV >= uV || !vctrl->ovp_threshold)
/* voltage rising or no OVP */
- return regulator_set_voltage(
- ctrl_reg,
+ return regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
vctrl_calc_ctrl_voltage(vctrl, req_min_uV),
- vctrl_calc_ctrl_voltage(vctrl, req_max_uV));
+ vctrl_calc_ctrl_voltage(vctrl, req_max_uV),
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
while (uV > req_min_uV) {
int max_drop_uV = (uV * vctrl->ovp_threshold) / 100;
@@ -114,9 +117,10 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
next_uV = max_t(int, req_min_uV, uV - max_drop_uV);
next_ctrl_uV = vctrl_calc_ctrl_voltage(vctrl, next_uV);
- ret = regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg,
+ ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
+ next_ctrl_uV,
next_ctrl_uV,
- next_ctrl_uV);
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
if (ret)
goto err;
@@ -130,7 +134,8 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
err:
/* Try to go back to original voltage */
- regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg, orig_ctrl_uV, orig_ctrl_uV);
+ regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev, orig_ctrl_uV, orig_ctrl_uV,
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
return ret;
}
@@ -155,9 +160,10 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
if (selector >= vctrl->sel || !vctrl->ovp_threshold) {
/* voltage rising or no OVP */
- ret = regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg,
+ ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
+ vctrl->vtable[selector].ctrl,
vctrl->vtable[selector].ctrl,
- vctrl->vtable[selector].ctrl);
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
if (!ret)
vctrl->sel = selector;
@@ -173,9 +179,10 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
else
next_sel = vctrl->vtable[vctrl->sel].ovp_min_sel;
- ret = regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg,
+ ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
vctrl->vtable[next_sel].ctrl,
- vctrl->vtable[next_sel].ctrl);
+ vctrl->vtable[next_sel].ctrl,
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&rdev->dev,
"failed to set control voltage to %duV\n",
@@ -195,9 +202,10 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
err:
if (vctrl->sel != orig_sel) {
/* Try to go back to original voltage */
- if (!regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg,
+ if (!regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
+ vctrl->vtable[orig_sel].ctrl,
vctrl->vtable[orig_sel].ctrl,
- vctrl->vtable[orig_sel].ctrl))
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON))
vctrl->sel = orig_sel;
else
dev_warn(&rdev->dev,
@@ -482,7 +490,7 @@ static int vctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage(vctrl->ctrl_reg);
+ ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(vctrl->ctrl_reg->rdev);
if (ctrl_uV < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get control voltage\n");
return ctrl_uV;
--
2.24.1
The patch
regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and setting the voltage
has been applied to the regulator tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-5.5
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
From e9153311491da9d9863ead9888a1613531cb4a1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:45:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and
setting the voltage
`cat /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/regulator_summary` ends on a deadlock
when you have a voltage controlled regulator (vctrl).
The problem is that the vctrl_get_voltage() and vctrl_set_voltage() calls the
regulator_get_voltage() and regulator_set_voltage() and that will try to lock
again the dependent regulators (the regulator supplying the control voltage).
Fix the issue by exporting the unlocked version of the regulator_get_voltage()
and regulator_set_voltage() API so drivers that need it, like the voltage
controlled regulator driver can use it.
Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Reported-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 ++
drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 2961ac08d1ae..6be687d25484 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3466,6 +3466,7 @@ int regulator_set_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV,
out:
return ret;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_set_voltage_rdev);
static int regulator_limit_voltage_step(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
int *current_uV, int *min_uV)
@@ -4030,6 +4031,7 @@ int regulator_get_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
return ret;
return ret - rdev->constraints->uV_offset;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_get_voltage_rdev);
/**
* regulator_get_voltage - get regulator output voltage
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
index 9a9ee8188109..cbadb1c99679 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
@@ -11,10 +11,13 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/coupler.h>
#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
#include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
+#include "internal.h"
+
struct vctrl_voltage_range {
int min_uV;
int max_uV;
@@ -79,7 +82,7 @@ static int vctrl_calc_output_voltage(struct vctrl_data *vctrl, int ctrl_uV)
static int vctrl_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
struct vctrl_data *vctrl = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
- int ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage(vctrl->ctrl_reg);
+ int ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(vctrl->ctrl_reg->rdev);
return vctrl_calc_output_voltage(vctrl, ctrl_uV);
}
@@ -90,16 +93,16 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
{
struct vctrl_data *vctrl = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
struct regulator *ctrl_reg = vctrl->ctrl_reg;
- int orig_ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage(ctrl_reg);
+ int orig_ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev);
int uV = vctrl_calc_output_voltage(vctrl, orig_ctrl_uV);
int ret;
if (req_min_uV >= uV || !vctrl->ovp_threshold)
/* voltage rising or no OVP */
- return regulator_set_voltage(
- ctrl_reg,
+ return regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
vctrl_calc_ctrl_voltage(vctrl, req_min_uV),
- vctrl_calc_ctrl_voltage(vctrl, req_max_uV));
+ vctrl_calc_ctrl_voltage(vctrl, req_max_uV),
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
while (uV > req_min_uV) {
int max_drop_uV = (uV * vctrl->ovp_threshold) / 100;
@@ -114,9 +117,10 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
next_uV = max_t(int, req_min_uV, uV - max_drop_uV);
next_ctrl_uV = vctrl_calc_ctrl_voltage(vctrl, next_uV);
- ret = regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg,
+ ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
+ next_ctrl_uV,
next_ctrl_uV,
- next_ctrl_uV);
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
if (ret)
goto err;
@@ -130,7 +134,8 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
err:
/* Try to go back to original voltage */
- regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg, orig_ctrl_uV, orig_ctrl_uV);
+ regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev, orig_ctrl_uV, orig_ctrl_uV,
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
return ret;
}
@@ -155,9 +160,10 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
if (selector >= vctrl->sel || !vctrl->ovp_threshold) {
/* voltage rising or no OVP */
- ret = regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg,
+ ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
+ vctrl->vtable[selector].ctrl,
vctrl->vtable[selector].ctrl,
- vctrl->vtable[selector].ctrl);
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
if (!ret)
vctrl->sel = selector;
@@ -173,9 +179,10 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
else
next_sel = vctrl->vtable[vctrl->sel].ovp_min_sel;
- ret = regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg,
+ ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
vctrl->vtable[next_sel].ctrl,
- vctrl->vtable[next_sel].ctrl);
+ vctrl->vtable[next_sel].ctrl,
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&rdev->dev,
"failed to set control voltage to %duV\n",
@@ -195,9 +202,10 @@ static int vctrl_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
err:
if (vctrl->sel != orig_sel) {
/* Try to go back to original voltage */
- if (!regulator_set_voltage(ctrl_reg,
+ if (!regulator_set_voltage_rdev(ctrl_reg->rdev,
+ vctrl->vtable[orig_sel].ctrl,
vctrl->vtable[orig_sel].ctrl,
- vctrl->vtable[orig_sel].ctrl))
+ PM_SUSPEND_ON))
vctrl->sel = orig_sel;
else
dev_warn(&rdev->dev,
@@ -482,7 +490,7 @@ static int vctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage(vctrl->ctrl_reg);
+ ctrl_uV = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(vctrl->ctrl_reg->rdev);
if (ctrl_uV < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get control voltage\n");
return ctrl_uV;
--
2.20.1
16.01.2020 12:45, Enric Balletbo i Serra пишет:
> `cat /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/regulator_summary` ends on a deadlock
> when you have a voltage controlled regulator (vctrl).
>
> The problem is that the vctrl_get_voltage() and vctrl_set_voltage() calls the
> regulator_get_voltage() and regulator_set_voltage() and that will try to lock
> again the dependent regulators (the regulator supplying the control voltage).
>
> Fix the issue by exporting the unlocked version of the regulator_get_voltage()
> and regulator_set_voltage() API so drivers that need it, like the voltage
> controlled regulator driver can use it.
>
> Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
> Reported-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 ++
> drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 03d79fee2987..e7d167ce326c 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -3470,6 +3470,7 @@ int regulator_set_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV,
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_set_voltage_rdev);
>
> static int regulator_limit_voltage_step(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> int *current_uV, int *min_uV)
> @@ -4034,6 +4035,7 @@ int regulator_get_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> return ret;
> return ret - rdev->constraints->uV_offset;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_get_voltage_rdev);
I think it should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:28:04PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 16.01.2020 12:45, Enric Balletbo i Serra пишет:
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_set_voltage_rdev);
> >
> > static int regulator_limit_voltage_step(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> > int *current_uV, int *min_uV)
> > @@ -4034,6 +4035,7 @@ int regulator_get_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> > return ret;
> > return ret - rdev->constraints->uV_offset;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_get_voltage_rdev);
> I think it should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().
Yes, you're right.
On 20/1/20 13:08, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:28:04PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 16.01.2020 12:45, Enric Balletbo i Serra пишет:
>
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_set_voltage_rdev);
>>>
>>> static int regulator_limit_voltage_step(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>>> int *current_uV, int *min_uV)
>>> @@ -4034,6 +4035,7 @@ int regulator_get_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>>> return ret;
>>> return ret - rdev->constraints->uV_offset;
>>> }
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(regulator_get_voltage_rdev);
>
>> I think it should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().
>
> Yes, you're right.
>
Oops, right, Mark do you want me to send a follow-up patch, a second version or
you can just apply a fix?
Thanks,
Enric
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 01:10:18PM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> On 20/1/20 13:08, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Yes, you're right.
> Oops, right, Mark do you want me to send a follow-up patch, a second version or
> you can just apply a fix?
If you send a patch before I get round to writing one myself I'll apply
it.