2020-01-21 10:39:04

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 04/20] ARM: aspeed: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP

Support for the 6th generation Aspeed SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_ASPEED_G6 to
select HAVE_SMP.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Stanley <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]>
---
All patches in this series are independent of each other.
Cover letter at https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig
index e8d6e9957d65b717..ea96d11b850241ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ config MACH_ASPEED_G6
select PINCTRL_ASPEED_G6
select ARM_GIC
select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
- select HAVE_SMP
help
Say yes if you intend to run on an Aspeed ast2600 or similar
sixth generation Aspeed BMCs.
--
2.17.1


2020-01-28 01:10:21

by Andrew Jeffery

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/20] ARM: aspeed: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP



On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, at 21:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Support for the 6th generation Aspeed SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
> As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_ASPEED_G6 to
> select HAVE_SMP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joel Stanley <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]>

2020-01-31 03:52:13

by Joel Stanley

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/20] ARM: aspeed: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP

On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 01:05, Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, at 21:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Support for the 6th generation Aspeed SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
> > As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_ASPEED_G6 to
> > select HAVE_SMP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Joel Stanley <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Joel Stanley <[email protected]>

Geert, did you intend for these to be picked up by Arnd and Olof?

2020-01-31 08:15:10

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/20] ARM: aspeed: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP

Hi Joel,

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 4:50 AM Joel Stanley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 01:05, Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, at 21:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Support for the 6th generation Aspeed SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
> > > As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_ASPEED_G6 to
> > > select HAVE_SMP.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Joel Stanley <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Joel Stanley <[email protected]>
>
> Geert, did you intend for these to be picked up by Arnd and Olof?

Feel free to pick it up.
I'll resend the remaining patches to the arm-soc maintainers later.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds