2020-02-12 09:33:42

by Arnaud POULIQUEN

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: fix kernel-doc warnings

Fix the following warnings when documentation is built:
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c:330: warning: Function parameter
or member 'id' not described in 'rproc_add_virtio_dev'
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:243: warning: Function parameter
or member 'name' not described in 'rproc_find_carveout_by_name'
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:473: warning: Function parameter
or member 'offset' not described in 'rproc_handle_vdev'
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:604: warning: Function parameter
or member 'offset' not described in 'rproc_handle_trace'
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:678: warning: Function parameter
or member 'offset' not described in 'rproc_handle_devmem'
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:873: warning: Function parameter
or member 'offset' not described in 'rproc_handle_carveout'
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:1029: warning: cannot understand function
prototype: 'rproc_handle_resource_t rproc_loading_handlers[RSC_LAST] = '
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:1693: warning: Function parameter
or member 'work' not described in 'rproc_crash_handler_work'

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 9 +++++++--
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 097f33e4f1f3..5f9a5812505c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_da_to_va);
/**
* rproc_find_carveout_by_name() - lookup the carveout region by a name
* @rproc: handle of a remote processor
- * @name,..: carveout name to find (standard printf format)
+ * @name: carveout name to find (standard printf format)
*
* Platform driver has the capability to register some pre-allacoted carveout
* (physically contiguous memory regions) before rproc firmware loading and
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev)
* rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
* @rproc: the remote processor
* @rsc: the vring resource descriptor
+ * @offset: offset of the resource entry
* @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
*
* This resource entry requests the host to statically register a virtio
@@ -587,6 +588,7 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
* rproc_handle_trace() - handle a shared trace buffer resource
* @rproc: the remote processor
* @rsc: the trace resource descriptor
+ * @offset: offset of the resource entry
* @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
*
* In case the remote processor dumps trace logs into memory,
@@ -652,6 +654,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
* rproc_handle_devmem() - handle devmem resource entry
* @rproc: remote processor handle
* @rsc: the devmem resource entry
+ * @offset: offset of the resource entry
* @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
*
* Remote processors commonly need to access certain on-chip peripherals.
@@ -853,6 +856,7 @@ static int rproc_release_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
* rproc_handle_carveout() - handle phys contig memory allocation requests
* @rproc: rproc handle
* @rsc: the resource entry
+ * @offset: offset of the resource entry
* @avail: size of available data (for image validation)
*
* This function will handle firmware requests for allocation of physically
@@ -1022,7 +1026,7 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, int len,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init);

-/**
+/*
* A lookup table for resource handlers. The indices are defined in
* enum fw_resource_type.
*/
@@ -1685,6 +1689,7 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)

/**
* rproc_crash_handler_work() - handle a crash
+ * @work: work treating the crash
*
* This function needs to handle everything related to a crash, like cpu
* registers and stack dump, information to help to debug the fatal error, etc.
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
index 8c07cb2ca8ba..eb817132bc5f 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
@@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev)
/**
* rproc_add_virtio_dev() - register an rproc-induced virtio device
* @rvdev: the remote vdev
+ * @id: the device type identification (used to match it with a driver).
*
* This function registers a virtio device. This vdev's partent is
* the rproc device.
--
2.17.1


2020-02-12 15:55:23

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: fix kernel-doc warnings

Hi,

kernel-doc supports "..." as a function argument for varargs.
See Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst:

"If a function has a variable number of arguments, its description should
be written in kernel-doc notation as::

* @...: description"


So the below could be done as:

On 2/12/20 1:32 AM, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 097f33e4f1f3..5f9a5812505c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_da_to_va);
> /**
> * rproc_find_carveout_by_name() - lookup the carveout region by a name
> * @rproc: handle of a remote processor
> - * @name,..: carveout name to find (standard printf format)
> + * @name: carveout name to find (standard printf format)

* @name: carveout name to find
* @...: standard printf format of args to search for carveout name

although I'm not so sure about the descriptions there.

> *
> * Platform driver has the capability to register some pre-allacoted carveout
> * (physically contiguous memory regions) before rproc firmware loading and


thanks for the kernel-doc update.
--
~Randy

2020-02-12 16:02:22

by Arnaud POULIQUEN

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: fix kernel-doc warnings

Hi Randy

On 2/12/20 4:54 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> kernel-doc supports "..." as a function argument for varargs.
> See Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst:
>
> "If a function has a variable number of arguments, its description should
> be written in kernel-doc notation as::
>
> * @...: description"
I missed it, thanks for pointing it out!

Regards
Arnaud
>
>
> So the below could be done as:
>
> On 2/12/20 1:32 AM, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index 097f33e4f1f3..5f9a5812505c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_da_to_va);
>> /**
>> * rproc_find_carveout_by_name() - lookup the carveout region by a name
>> * @rproc: handle of a remote processor
>> - * @name,..: carveout name to find (standard printf format)
>> + * @name: carveout name to find (standard printf format)
>
> * @name: carveout name to find
> * @...: standard printf format of args to search for carveout name
>
> although I'm not so sure about the descriptions there.
>
>> *
>> * Platform driver has the capability to register some pre-allacoted carveout
>> * (physically contiguous memory regions) before rproc firmware loading and
>
>
> thanks for the kernel-doc update.
>