Hi all,
After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
kernel/module.c: In function 'do_init_module':
kernel/module.c:3593:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_enable_ro'; did you mean 'module_enable_x'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
3593 | module_enable_ro(mod, true);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| module_enable_x
Caused by commit
e6eff4376e28 ("module: Make module_enable_ro() static again")
This config has neither CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX or
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX set. This failure was hidden in
linux-next due to commit
db991af02f11 ("module: break nested ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX and STRICT_MODULE_RWX #ifdefs")
from the modules tree. I have cherry-picked that commit for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:37:15AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/module.c: In function 'do_init_module':
> kernel/module.c:3593:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_enable_ro'; did you mean 'module_enable_x'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 3593 | module_enable_ro(mod, true);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | module_enable_x
>
> Caused by commit
>
> e6eff4376e28 ("module: Make module_enable_ro() static again")
>
> This config has neither CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX or
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX set. This failure was hidden in
> linux-next due to commit
>
> db991af02f11 ("module: break nested ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX and STRICT_MODULE_RWX #ifdefs")
>
> from the modules tree. I have cherry-picked that commit for today.
Sorry, I guessed we missed that dependency between the live-patching and
module trees.
Jessica, are you planning on sending a pull request?
--
Josh
+++ Josh Poimboeuf [04/06/20 19:04 -0500]:
>On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:37:15AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> kernel/module.c: In function 'do_init_module':
>> kernel/module.c:3593:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_enable_ro'; did you mean 'module_enable_x'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 3593 | module_enable_ro(mod, true);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | module_enable_x
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>> e6eff4376e28 ("module: Make module_enable_ro() static again")
>>
>> This config has neither CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX or
>> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX set. This failure was hidden in
>> linux-next due to commit
>>
>> db991af02f11 ("module: break nested ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX and STRICT_MODULE_RWX #ifdefs")
>>
>> from the modules tree. I have cherry-picked that commit for today.
>
>Sorry, I guessed we missed that dependency between the live-patching and
>module trees.
>
>Jessica, are you planning on sending a pull request?
Yep, just sent. So hopefully this gets resolved in the next day or two.