2020-07-01 23:29:12

by Namjae Jeon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.7.y 0/5] exfat stable patches for 5.7.y

Could you please push exfat stable patches into 5.7.y kernel tree ?

Thanks!

Dan Carpenter (1):
exfat: add missing brelse() calls on error paths

Hyeongseok.Kim (1):
exfat: Set the unused characters of FileName field to the value 0000h

Hyunchul Lee (1):
exfat: call sync_filesystem for read-only remount

Namjae Jeon (1):
exfat: move setting VOL_DIRTY over exfat_remove_entries()

Sungjong Seo (1):
exfat: flush dirty metadata in fsync

fs/exfat/dir.c | 12 +++++++-----
fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h | 1 +
fs/exfat/file.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
fs/exfat/namei.c | 14 +++++++++++---
fs/exfat/super.c | 10 ++++++++++
5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--
2.17.1


2020-07-02 01:39:59

by Sasha Levin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.7.y 0/5] exfat stable patches for 5.7.y

Hi Namjae,

On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 08:20:19AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>Could you please push exfat stable patches into 5.7.y kernel tree ?

I've queued them up, however it would be much easier if for commits that
don't require any modification to allow backporting you would just
provide the commit ids in Linus's tree rather than the patches
themselves.

I do see that you had to modify this one:

>Sungjong Seo (1):
> exfat: flush dirty metadata in fsync

In which case, a header in the commit message indicating the upstream
commit id would be appriciated. Something like this:

[ Upstream commit 5267456e953fd8c5abd8e278b1cc6a9f9027ac0a ]

Thank you!

--
Thanks,
Sasha

2020-07-02 01:47:46

by Namjae Jeon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5.7.y 0/5] exfat stable patches for 5.7.y

> Hi Namjae,
Hi Sasha,
>
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 08:20:19AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> >Could you please push exfat stable patches into 5.7.y kernel tree ?
>
> I've queued them up, however it would be much easier if for commits that don't require any
> modification to allow backporting you would just provide the commit ids in Linus's tree rather than
> the patches themselves.
>
> I do see that you had to modify this one:
>
> >Sungjong Seo (1):
> > exfat: flush dirty metadata in fsync
>
> In which case, a header in the commit message indicating the upstream commit id would be appriciated.
> Something like this:
Okay, I'll do that next time!
Thank you!
>
> [ Upstream commit 5267456e953fd8c5abd8e278b1cc6a9f9027ac0a ]
>
> Thank you!
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha