The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
("probe_new") can be used instead.
This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 5 ++---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c | 10 ++++------
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c | 5 ++---
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c
index a5d3708fedf6..d0dcf69cc76d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c
@@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static const struct property_entry eeprom_properties[] = {
*/
static struct i2c_client *dm6446evm_msp;
-static int dm6446evm_msp_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
- const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int dm6446evm_msp_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
dm6446evm_msp = client;
return 0;
@@ -569,7 +568,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id dm6446evm_msp_ids[] = {
static struct i2c_driver dm6446evm_msp_driver = {
.driver.name = "dm6446evm_msp",
.id_table = dm6446evm_msp_ids,
- .probe = dm6446evm_msp_probe,
+ .probe_new = dm6446evm_msp_probe,
.remove = dm6446evm_msp_remove,
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c
index 4600b617f9b4..2dce16fff77e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c
@@ -160,8 +160,7 @@ static struct platform_device davinci_aemif_device = {
#define DM646X_EVM_ATA_PWD BIT(1)
/* CPLD Register 0 Client: used for I/O Control */
-static int cpld_reg0_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
- const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int cpld_reg0_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
if (HAS_ATA) {
u8 data;
@@ -197,7 +196,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id cpld_reg_ids[] = {
static struct i2c_driver dm6467evm_cpld_driver = {
.driver.name = "cpld_reg0",
.id_table = cpld_reg_ids,
- .probe = cpld_reg0_probe,
+ .probe_new = cpld_reg0_probe,
};
/* LEDS */
@@ -402,8 +401,7 @@ static struct snd_platform_data dm646x_evm_snd_data[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_I2C
static struct i2c_client *cpld_client;
-static int cpld_video_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
- const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int cpld_video_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
cpld_client = client;
return 0;
@@ -424,7 +422,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver cpld_video_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "cpld_video",
},
- .probe = cpld_video_probe,
+ .probe_new = cpld_video_probe,
.remove = cpld_video_remove,
.id_table = cpld_video_id,
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c
index 34f1baa10c54..43b587e79d21 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c
@@ -378,8 +378,7 @@ static const struct {
.i2c_devs = wm2200_i2c, .num_i2c_devs = ARRAY_SIZE(wm2200_i2c) },
};
-static int wlf_gf_module_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
- const struct i2c_device_id *i2c_id)
+static int wlf_gf_module_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
{
int ret, i, j, id, rev;
@@ -432,7 +431,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver wlf_gf_module_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "wlf-gf-module"
},
- .probe = wlf_gf_module_probe,
+ .probe_new = wlf_gf_module_probe,
.id_table = wlf_gf_module_id,
};
--
2.25.4
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:31:00PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> ("probe_new") can be used instead.
>
> This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 5 ++---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c | 10 ++++------
> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c | 5 ++---
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Hi,
You need to split it per sub architecture maintainers. The subject
prefix is then for example: "ARM: s3c64xx: ".
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Hi,
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 10:38:58 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:31:00PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> > their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> > ("probe_new") can be used instead.
> >
> > This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 5 ++---
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c | 10 ++++------
> > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c | 5 ++---
> > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> You need to split it per sub architecture maintainers. The subject
> prefix is then for example: "ARM: s3c64xx: ".
Thanks, will do!
Regards,
Stephen