Like A33 "sun4i-ss" has a difference, it give SHA1 digest
directly in BE. So add new compatible.
Tested-by: Martin Cerveny <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin Cerveny <[email protected]>
---
.../bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
index fc823572b..180efd13a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ properties:
- const: allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto
- items:
- const: allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto
+ - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto
reg:
maxItems: 1
@@ -59,7 +60,9 @@ if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
- const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto
+ oneOf:
+ - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto
+ - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto
then:
required:
--
2.17.1
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 01:40:15PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:57:19PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:32:49AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:30:59AM +0200, Martin Cerveny wrote:
> > > > Like A33 "sun4i-ss" has a difference, it give SHA1 digest
> > > > directly in BE. So add new compatible.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Martin Cerveny <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > The Tested-by tag is for the other developpers. You're very much
> > > expected to have tested your patch before contributing it.
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Cerveny <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml | 5 ++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
> > > > index fc823572b..180efd13a 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
> > > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ properties:
> > > > - const: allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto
> > > > - items:
> > > > - const: allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto
> > > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto
> > >
> > > If it's compatible with the A33, why do we need to introduce a new compatible?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > reg:
> > > > maxItems: 1
> > > > @@ -59,7 +60,9 @@ if:
> > > > properties:
> > > > compatible:
> > > > contains:
> > > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto
> > > > + oneOf:
> > > > + - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto
> > > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto
> > >
> > > I guess the A33 compatible should be on that list as well?
> >
> > This is the list of "need reset".
> > So we cannot use allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto
> > Probably this explanation should be in the commit message.
>
> But the A33 has a reset in the DTSI
>
Oh right so I need to send a fix for that and Martin Cerveny could simply use the "allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto" (and so keep only patch #1(DTS))
Regards