LinuxLists.cc - [btrfs] fac2f60d5f: fsmark.files_per

2020-11-10 05:48:06

Subject: [btrfs] fac2f60d5f: fsmark.files_per_sec 62.6% improvement

Greeting,

FYI, we noticed a

commit: fac2f60d5fe83fd45ee In addition to that,
+------------------+------- | testcase: change | test machine | test parameters | | disk=1SSD | | filesize=8K | | fs=btrfs | | iterations=1x | | | | nr_threads=32t | | | test_size=400M | | ucode=0x5002f01 +------------------+-------

Details are as below:
---------------------------

To reproduce:

git clone bin/lkp install job.yaml bin/lkp run job.yaml

=========================== compiler/cpufreq_governor/d gcc-9/performance/1SSD/9B
commit:
b010373b40 ("btrfs: fac2f60d5f ("btrfs:
b010373b4014116a fac2f60d5f ---------------- ---------- %stddev %change \ | 1111549 ? 3% 8149 ? 2% +62.6% 13.56 ? 2% -35.3% 13.56 ? 2% -35.3% 2365160 ? 3% 1073 -37.0% 144.77 -59.6% 2421162 ? 2% -66.0% 88.93 +3.7% 9.91 ? 2% -34.0% 253958 -23.3% 323262 -18.2% 558709 ? 92% -93.8% 1783705 ? 6% 78002 ? 27% -45.0% 0.06 ? 14% +0.0 0.74 +0.3 0.08 +0.0 10.42 -4.2 88.50 +3.7% 46998 ? 3% +22.7% 295884 ? 3% -51.2% 184790 ? 2% 1.214e+08 1215140 ? 3% -88.0% 1.117e+09 ? 3% 3631170 ? 3% 26134 ? 9% +67.7% 198981 ? 14% -30.3% 197944 ? 15% -30.6% 7830 ? 36% -73.6% 15277 ? 14% +25.3% 3697 ? 77% +152.0% 236590 ? 6% -29.9% 234474 ? 6% -30.1% 278019 ? 2% 145261 ? 2% 9433 ? 2% +21.8% 145261 ? 2% 243266 +35.5% 48521 ? 11% -30.3% 1957 ? 36% -73.6% 48521 ? 11% -30.3% 56472 ? 73% +144.6% 3862 ? 13% +25.0% 924.00 ? 77% +152.1% 132552 ? 31% -62.4% 99918 ? 3% -13.5% 1972 ? 3% -13.3% 100598 ? 3% -13.3% 1972 ? 3% -13.3% 49053 ? 3% -13.2% 944.25 ? 4% -13.2% 49133 ? 4% -13.2% 944.25 ? 4% -13.2% 48487 ? 4% -13.6% 1732 ? 4% -13.5% 48511 ? 4% -13.5% 1732 ? 4% -13.5% 6772 ? 4% -97.3% 108.75 ? 3% -97.2% 6772 ? 4% -97.3% 108.75 ? 3% -97.2% 5.41 ? 71% -3.3 5.41 ? 71% -3.3 4.54 ?100% -2.5 4.54 ?100% -2.5 4.54 ?100% -2.5 4.54 ?100% -2.5 4.54 ?100% -2.5 4.06 ?101% -2.0 4.06 ?101% -2.0 4.54 ?100% -4.5 4.54 ?100% -4.3 5.41 ? 71% -3.3 5.41 ? 71% -3.3 5.41 ? 71% -3.3 5.41 ? 71% -3.3 4.54 ?100% -2.5 4.06 ?101% -2.0 528.50 58090 ? 4% -30.4% 69130 +4.6% 295117 ? 2% 387199 71383 +4.5% 69177 ? 3% -8.3% 19128 +1.9% 2358 ? 2% +21.7% 2881 -1.2% 36346 ? 2% -9.3% 295151 ? 2% 528.50 58090 ? 4% -30.4% 71383 +4.5% 69177 ? 3% -8.3% 502830 471656 22135 -9.1% 529483 123890 -11.0% 259358 ? 34% +66.9% 786773 ? 4% -12.5% 5628 ? 2% -14.1% 10.41 ? 4% -23.1% 1.297e+08 ? 4% 359955 -48.0% 2.96 -36.1% 3.695e+10 0.02 ? 2% +0.0 466201 ? 2% +59.6% 0.01 ? 2% +0.0 66981 ? 2% +73.8% 4122745 ? 2% 7202794 3095 ? 2% +17.0% 0.38 +49.7% 0.38 -32.0% 7960 ? 3% +27.9% 307681 ? 13% +63.3% 7961 ? 3% +27.9% 10.30 ? 4% -23.0% 2.94 -35.7% 0.02 ? 2% +0.0 0.01 ? 2% +0.0 36.40 -1.0 3056 ? 2% +17.8% 0.34 +55.4% 1.206e+08 ? 4% 334704 -49.7% 89285 -3.3% 3.438e+10 433642 ? 2% +54.1% 62411 ? 2% +67.6% 3834185 ? 2% 6698496 7391 ? 3% +23.9% 286228 ? 13% +57.8% 7392 ? 3% +23.9% 89285 -3.3% 1.69e+11 ? 3% 152404 ? 5% -49.9% 2754 ? 14% -67.8% 30120 -30.3% 250.50 ? 21% -75.2% 3387 ? 27% -62.7% 30104 -31.1% 364.50 ? 28% -81.7% 1850 ? 12% -47.5% 30081 -30.4% 216.25 ? 18% -61.7% 2506 ? 10% -64.0% 30066 -29.8% 359.00 ? 20% -83.4% 2464 ? 25% -61.0% 30063 -30.0% 326.00 ? 26% -77.8% 2060 ? 26% -54.3% 29932 ? 2% -29.5% 258.75 ? 33% -68.6% 2226 ? 34% -49.9% 30075 -29.8% 277.50 ? 43% -67.8% 2581 ? 17% -68.7% 29982 ? 2% -30.1% 320.75 ? 22% -74.1% 3101 ? 25% -70.6% 30034 -30.9% 278.00 ? 27% -72.6% 30061 -30.2% 30048 -29.7% 30059 -29.9% 2960 ? 44% -68.6% 29980 ? 2% -29.7% 317.75 ? 35% -77.3% 2478 ? 33% -64.0% 29995 -29.7% 317.00 ? 44% -82.9% 2356 ? 29% -53.6% 30051 -29.9% 278.00 ? 32% -71.0% 2209 ? 43% -60.3% 30063 -29.8% 291.50 ? 57% -78.6% 2241 ? 22% -53.8% 30081 -30.0% 296.50 ? 20% -72.3% 30057 ? 2% -30.4% 1056 ? 27% -48.5% 29999 ? 2% -29.7% 29686 ? 2% -29.0% 30033 ? 2% -30.0% 30048 ? 2% -29.8% 29785 ? 2% -29.5% 2767 ? 17% -63.9% 30050 -29.8% 361.00 ? 22% -80.5% 29993 -29.8% 30207 -30.3% 30029 -29.9% 29887 -29.5% 29981 ? 2% -29.7% 29692 -29.1% 30009 -29.8% 29988 -29.9% 30027 -29.9% 30008 ? 2% -29.8% 2795 ? 15% -58.8% 30055 -30.0% 337.75 ? 13% -80.2% 30019 -29.9% 30042 -29.9% 29988 ? 2% -29.8% 29965 -29.8% 30005 ? 2% -29.9% 30056 -29.9% 30001 -29.9% 29986 ? 2% -29.7% 1844 ? 12% -47.7% 30050 -30.0% 229.75 ? 19% -69.9% 2444 ? 28% -65.5% 30077 -29.9% 297.25 ? 29% -79.6% 2547 ? 31% -55.7% 30068 -29.7% 362.25 ? 38% -78.7% 2085 ? 20% -56.5% 30069 -29.9% 270.75 ? 29% -75.5% 2689 ? 26% -64.3% 30084 -29.2% 349.00 ? 30% -81.5% 2423 ? 25% -61.6% 30071 -29.8% 291.75 ? 32% -73.9% 2067 ? 36% -61.7% 30071 -30.1% 258.00 ? 47% -74.4% 2839 ? 9% -67.0% 30099 -29.9% 388.25 ? 14% -80.4% 2524 ? 26% -65.8% 30059 -29.8% 331.50 ? 32% -84.4% 2397 ? 26% -70.4% 30051 -29.7% 304.50 ? 27% -81.5% 2955 ? 17% -63.2% 30026 -29.7% 402.50 ? 22% -79.5% 2827 ? 17% -67.9% 30063 -29.8% 350.00 ? 26% -81.4% 2401 ? 15% -57.3% 30072 -29.8% 276.75 ? 8% -72.2% 2266 ? 15% -53.0% 30063 -29.8% 276.00 ? 10% -65.0% 2667 ? 9% -69.7% 30061 -30.1% 336.75 ? 15% -82.2% 2366 ? 21% -54.3% 30082 -29.8% 311.00 ? 30% -72.6% 2399 ? 18% -64.3% 30067 -30.1% 284.00 ? 22% -78.6% 30070 -29.8% 382.00 ? 14% -79.2% 2374 ? 26% -63.2% 30054 -29.9% 299.75 ? 26% -75.6% 2695 ? 24% -65.7% 30084 -30.0% 358.50 ? 35% -81.3% 2628 ? 18% -61.7% 30078 -29.8% 319.25 ? 21% -72.3% 30056 -29.7% 416.00 ? 31% -80.5% 2677 ? 34% -62.6% 30065 -29.2% 343.50 ? 44% -74.9% 2355 ? 32% -64.9% 30092 -29.9% 296.50 ? 41% -73.6% 2199 ? 31% -54.4% 30062 -30.6% 262.00 ? 38% -72.9% 2467 ? 33% -63.4% 30062 -30.0% 323.75 ? 39% -76.1% 2268 ? 33% -59.2% 30060 -29.8% 282.75 ? 38% -76.0% 29888 ? 2% -29.6% 30063 -29.9% 30072 -29.8% 30034 ? 2% -29.8% 30027 ? 2% -29.7% 30038 -29.7% 30065 -29.8% 29971 -29.7% 2632 ? 24% -57.7% 30087 -30.2% 337.00 ? 34% -73.7% 30075 -30.0% 30058 -30.0% 30048 -29.9% 30063 -30.1% 30073 ? 2% -30.0% 30076 -30.0% 30056 -30.0% 30057 -29.9% 29942 -29.6% 30051 -30.0% 30067 -29.8% 324.50 ? 35% -81.0% 30067 ? 2% -29.9% 30127 ? 3% -30.3% 29962 ? 2% -29.6% 30241 -30.0% 30040 -29.6% 30085 -29.9% 2883576 16309 ? 14% -73.7%

150 +-------------------- 140 |+++.+ ++ ++.++++ | ++ 130 |-+ 120 |-+ | 110 |-+ 100 |-+ 90 |-+ | 80 |-+ 70 |-+ | 60 |OOO OOOO OOO OOOO OOO O O 50 +-------------------- 1100 +------------------- 1050 |-+++ +++ ++ | + 1000 |-+ 950 |-+ | 900 |-+ 850 |-+ 800 |-+ | 750 |-+ O O O O O 700 |OO O O O O | O O O OO 650 |-+ 600 +------------------- 15 +--------------------- | 14 |-++. + ++. + + 13 |++ + +++ +++ + +.+++ + + | 12 |-+ | 11 |-+ | 10 |-+ 9 |-+ O | OO 8 |OOO OO O OOO O O OO O O | O O 7 +--------------------- 15 +--------------------- | 14 |-++. + ++. + + 13 |++ + +++ +++ + +.+++ + + | 12 |-+ | 11 |-+ | 10 |-+ 9 |-+ O | OO 8 |OOO OO O OOO O O OO O O | O O 7 +--------------------- 2.6e+06 +---------------- 2.4e+06 |++ + + | ++++++.++ + ++++++ ++++.+ 2.2e+06 |-+ 2e+06 |-+ | 1.8e+06 |-+ 1.6e+06 |-+ 1.4e+06 |-+ | 1.2e+06 |-+ 1e+06 |-+ | OOO 800000 |O+ OOO O O O O 600000 +---------------- 16000 +------------------ | O O 15000 |O+ O 14000 |-OOOO O OO OO O O O O | 13000 |-+ O 12000 |-+ | 11000 |-+ 10000 |-+ | 9000 |-+ 8000 |+++++.++++++++++.++++++++++. | 7000 +------------------ [*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample

*************************** lkp-csl-2sp7: 96 threads =========================== compiler/cpufreq_governor/d gcc-9/performance/1SSD/8K
commit:
b010373b40 ("btrfs: fac2f60d5f ("btrfs:
b010373b4014116a fac2f60d5f ---------------- ---------- %stddev %change \ | 585190 ? 2% -21.0% 7968 ? 2% +42.6% 584.75 -24.1% 41.77 -44.5% 859174 ? 2% -60.3% 165800 ? 2% -16.4% 243885 -10.1% 87533 ? 5% +24.8% 244338 ? 4% -51.0% 91.10 +0.8% 0.97 ? 8% +98.2% 6.77 ? 3% -24.9% 1.19 ? 8% +1.3 0.89 ? 6% +0.2 6.89 -2.2 233105 ? 6% +13.3% 119912 ? 15% -22.5% 135497 ? 9% -23.3% 22327 ? 8% -23.4% 14173 ? 5% -22.4% -15.50 +35.5% 1956 -9.4% 21216768 ? 5% 11775 ? 7% -39.4% 369943 +25.6% 488.75 2913 ? 6% -39.7% 2845 -1.3% 488.75 1955 ? 3% -17.3% 63044510 ? 2% 578945 -78.4% 6.614e+08 ? 5% 2104719 ? 2% 247244 -46.9% 62458 ? 4% -43.5% 579.00 ? 10% -45.1% 579.00 ? 10% -45.1% 2083 ? 3% -29.5% 2083 ? 3% -29.5% 4038 -11.0% 4038 -10.9% 9642 ? 3% -12.6% 9642 ? 3% -12.6% 6201 ? 2% -97.5% 6201 ? 2% -97.5% 2176 ? 7% -21.9% 2176 ? 7% -21.9% 154478 ? 37% +59.9% 8598 ? 7% -20.6% 323193 ? 13% +41.1% 161361 ? 36% +53.6% 161831 ? 14% +28.7% 18148 ? 12% -22.1% 7836 ? 38% +45.0% 119539 ? 5% 37998 ? 8% -74.1% 37186 ? 9% -76.0% 3056 ? 27% -81.3% 192203 ? 32% -52.5% 49142 ? 15% -69.5% 15411 ? 14% +26.5% 1263446 ? 8% 90893 ? 6% -13.8% 3304 ?107% +180.9% 135769 ? 5% -12.1% 24515 ? 17% +29.3% 38656 ? 37% +61.3% 73512 ? 5% +23.7% 2124 ? 8% -17.4% 40379 ? 36% +54.9% 40038 ? 14% +34.0% 1959 ? 38% +48.1% 29852 ? 5% +8.2% 71959 ? 5% +24.2% 24515 ? 17% +29.3% 40379 ? 36% +54.9% 40041 ? 14% +34.0% 9129 ? 9% -74.1% 25041 ? 20% -68.4% 775.25 ? 26% -82.3% 12257 ? 14% -67.3% 3919 ? 15% +27.1% 826.00 ?107% +180.8% 22725 ? 6% -13.9% 24390 ? 19% -67.9% 9129 ? 9% -74.1% 12257 ? 14% -67.3% 390.75 ? 32% -80.5% 10.85 ?143% -10.8 4.59 ?112% -4.6 4.59 ?112% -4.6 4.59 ?112% -4.6 4.59 ?112% -4.6 3.74 ?104% -3.7 3.74 ?104% -3.7 3.74 ?104% -3.7 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% +0.8 7.72 ?132% -7.7 3.74 ?104% -3.7 3.74 ?104% -3.7 3.74 ?104% -3.7 3.74 ?104% -3.7 3.74 ?104% -3.7 4.59 ?112% -3.2 4.59 ?112% -2.8 4.59 ?112% -2.8 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% -2.3 4.59 ?112% +0.8 4.59 ?112% -3.2 4.59 ?112% -2.3 10.74 -20.1% 2.98 -0.2 18754694 ? 16% 1.258e+08 324941 -48.6% 2.39 -27.7% 2.823e+10 ? 2% 1598 ? 35% -54.5% 0.03 ? 7% -0.0 118457 ? 4% +12.9% 38.10 +1.5 4290155 7498866 ? 2% 2912 +16.9% 0.48 +32.8% 0.29 ? 2% -23.5% 12172 ? 5% +27.6% 86.54 ? 2% -10.2 5533201 ? 15% 569588 ? 8% -22.4% 73.07 ? 6% -23.8 1955072 ? 16% -61.9% 469220 +27.9% 12173 ? 5% +27.6% 10.42 -18.6% 3.08 -0.3 14.88 ? 15% -4.8 2.34 -27.5% 0.03 ? 6% -0.0 36.39 +1.0 2814 +19.8% 0.43 +38.3% 90.59 -11.3 80.31 ? 3% -28.0 68514320 ? 2% 16421948 ? 16% 1.102e+08 284527 -51.1% 84053 -5.0% 2.472e+10 ? 2% 1396 ? 35% -56.8% 725466 ? 6% -15.4% 3756884 6567976 ? 2% 10638 ? 5% +21.0% 4846606 ? 15% 498627 ? 8% -26.4% 1712364 ? 16% -63.9% 410739 +21.4% 10639 ? 5% +21.0% 84053 -5.0% 8.562e+10 89183 -30.0% 17434 -22.0% 96.75 ? 32% -57.9% 1709 ? 19% -36.9% 17557 -22.3% 121.50 ? 11% -53.7% 1102 ? 13% -25.6% 17474 -21.9% 110.50 ? 20% -54.5% 1113 ? 3% -41.7% 17488 -23.1% 124.50 ? 7% -71.3% 1050 ? 7% -30.9% 17517 -22.9% 107.25 ? 10% -63.4% 1171 ? 6% -36.0% 17718 ? 2% -22.7% 123.00 ? 10% -61.2% 17545 -22.3% 1100 ? 4% -36.6% 17505 -20.6% 105.75 ? 22% -57.9% 1162 ? 7% -36.0% 17767 ? 2% -23.3% 652.00 ? 82% -93.1% 1093 ? 13% -41.6% 17451 -22.0% 1244 ? 6% -40.1% 17679 -23.2% 1114 ? 3% -27.7% 17403 -21.8% 132.75 ? 20% -66.9% 1202 ? 6% -35.8% 17563 -22.3% 124.00 ? 23% -61.7% 17522 -22.7% 380.75 ?112% -88.1% 1180 ? 5% -41.3% 17518 -22.3% 133.50 ? 24% -68.2% 1158 ? 7% -36.3% 17488 -23.5% 126.75 ? 26% -69.4% 17535 -22.5% 115.50 ? 29% -70.8% 661.50 ? 12% -29.1% 17519 -22.6% 622.00 ? 9% -36.1% 17543 -22.3% 791.00 ? 34% -43.6% 17517 -23.1% 644.25 ? 5% -38.5% 17521 -22.3% 672.75 ? 12% -31.4% 17521 -22.5% 17467 -22.2% 1116 ? 11% -35.0% 17481 -22.8% 113.25 ? 28% -68.2% 688.00 ? 5% -35.9% 17528 -23.0% 685.75 ? 7% -36.0% 17519 -22.3% 17531 -22.4% 690.25 ? 13% -33.3% 17535 -22.4% 17412 -21.8% 17518 -22.9% 646.25 ? 7% -28.9% 17526 -22.3% 679.00 ? 13% -33.9% 17259 ? 3% -21.3% 638.25 ? 6% -30.7% 17205 ? 3% -20.9% 732.50 ? 3% -39.4% 17534 -22.4% 1130 ? 6% -34.9% 17492 -21.9% 123.00 ? 25% -65.9% 17575 -23.4% 666.00 ? 10% -28.5% 17517 -22.8% 627.25 ? 12% -26.5% 17525 -23.7% 17519 -22.5% 678.75 ? 9% -30.4% 17536 -22.2% 714.50 ? 11% -35.1% 17533 -22.5% 695.25 ? 3% -34.6% 17514 -22.4% 718.25 ? 15% -36.6% 17530 -22.3% 1091 ? 6% -39.5% 17501 -22.5% 109.25 ? 24% -69.8% 1097 ? 2% -33.8% 17494 -22.3% 128.50 ? 21% -66.9% 1078 ? 10% -35.3% 17473 -21.0% 100.50 ? 23% -49.5% 1093 ? 6% -33.1% 17535 -22.3% 120.50 ? 31% -69.3% 1596 ? 63% -51.2% 17519 -22.2% 131.75 ? 26% -55.0% 1006 ? 7% -22.5% 17485 -22.1% 113.75 ? 14% -56.3% 17534 -22.4% 107.50 ? 32% -53.7% 17461 -22.0% 96.50 ? 24% -59.1% 1068 ? 15% -23.8% 17544 -22.4% 17422 -21.8% 97.25 ? 13% -51.9% 1043 ? 2% -25.9% 17517 -22.2% 107.50 ? 18% -56.5% 985.50 ? 3% -21.0% 17535 -22.1% 101.00 ? 11% -60.1% 1135 ? 2% -35.1% 17537 -22.2% 105.25 ? 7% -58.2% 1130 ? 5% -31.5% 17535 -22.1% 125.25 ? 12% -66.7% 1143 ? 10% -33.0% 17378 -21.6% 120.00 ? 20% -61.2% 1149 ? 7% -36.6% 17382 -22.0% 125.00 ? 22% -65.4% 1218 ? 8% -32.0% 17561 -22.4% 130.75 ? 15% -57.9% 1266 ? 8% -35.1% 17551 -22.4% 134.75 ? 14% -65.5% 1375 ? 9% -43.8% 17547 -23.4% 149.50 ? 20% -68.2% 17416 -21.6% 136.75 ? 25% -56.3% 1297 ? 5% -35.6% 17492 -22.0% 138.50 ? 14% -68.4% 1185 ? 10% -36.6% 17523 -22.4% 122.75 ? 21% -65.4% 1248 ? 7% -37.7% 17491 -22.4% 110.00 ? 25% -58.9% 1134 ? 6% -29.1% 17535 -22.6% 106.25 ? 10% -61.9% 1756 ? 59% -55.1% 17543 -22.4% 123.00 ? 5% -59.8% 1099 ? 10% -33.5% 17492 -22.1% 109.25 ? 24% -64.3% 1095 ? 6% -33.5% 17525 -22.7% 115.50 ? 28% -63.9% 676.50 ? 11% -33.6% 17515 -22.3% 659.25 ? 7% -31.9% 17533 -21.3% 696.00 ? 16% -33.5% 17535 -22.4% 17534 -22.3% 673.00 ? 10% -33.7% 17538 -22.4% 681.75 ? 12% -32.8% 17543 -22.3% 659.25 ? 2% -28.5% 17524 -22.2% 661.25 ? 6% -31.1% 17530 -22.3% 1150 ? 9% -30.8% 17524 -22.2% 117.75 ? 25% -66.0% 658.00 ? 13% -30.3% 17530 -22.3% 654.25 ? 11% -27.5% 17543 -22.3% 619.75 ? 10% -26.5% 17526 -22.2% 652.00 ? 10% -30.4% 17490 -22.1% 626.50 ? 13% -29.1% 17552 -22.4% 664.00 ? 7% -32.0% 17461 -22.0% 601.25 ? 9% -23.2% 17451 -21.9% 17476 -22.0% 574.00 ? 12% -21.2% 17552 -22.4% 652.50 ? 2% -29.6% 17521 -22.2% 1142 ? 9% -34.3% 17435 -22.4% 118.50 ? 7% -65.4% 631.75 ? 6% -28.5% 17497 -22.3% 638.50 ? 10% -27.7% 17474 -23.1% 653.75 ? 5% -38.2% 17514 -22.3% 864.75 ? 36% -47.8% 17521 -22.2% 646.25 ? 16% -31.7% 17530 -22.7% 1023 ? 60% -57.1% 17603 -22.5% 1681056 8062 ? 6% -63.4%

Disclaimer:
Results have been for informational design or configuration

Thanks,
Oliver Sang

62.6% improvement of fsmark.files_per_sec due to commit:
08a85c2eb7a09659edbe3 ("btrfs: switch extent buffer tree lock to rw_semaphore")
l.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git">https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 512G memory
The fsmark is a file system benchmark to test synchronous write workloads, for example, mail servers workload.
/sourceforge.net/projects/fsmark/">https://sourceforge.net/projects/fsmark/
the commit also has significant impact on the following tests:
---------------------------------------------------------------+
| fsmark: fsmark.files_per_sec 42.6% improvement |
| 96 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 512G memory |
| cpufreq_governor=performance |
|
|
|
|
| nr_directories=16d |
| nr_files_per_directory=256fpd |
|
| sync_method=fsyncBeforeClose |
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------->
href="https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git">https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
# job file is attached in this email
==============================================================
isk/filesize/fs/iterations/kconfig/nr_directories/nr_files_per_directory/nr_threads/rootfs/sync_method/tbox_group/test_size/testcase/ucode:
/btrfs/1x/x86_64-rhel-8.3/16d/256fpd/32t/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/fsyncBeforeClose/lkp-csl-2sp7/400M/fsmark/0x5002f01
fix potential overflow in cluster_pages_for_defrag on 32bit arch")
switch extent buffer tree lock to rw_semaphore")
e83fd45ee08a85c2e
-----------------
%stddev
\
-8.2% 1020575 ? 5% fsmark.app_overhead
13254 ? 5% fsmark.files_per_sec
8.77 ? 4% fsmark.time.elapsed_time
8.77 ? 4% fsmark.time.elapsed_time.max
-8.4% 2165632 ? 2% fsmark.time.file_system_outputs
676.00 fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
58.51 ? 3% fsmark.time.system_time
824094 ? 7% fsmark.time.voluntary_context_switches
92.23 iostat.cpu.idle
6.54 ? 4% iostat.cpu.system
194817 ? 3% softirqs.RCU
264378 ? 3% softirqs.SCHED
34831 ? 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load.max
-32.4% 1205297 ? 21% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.max
42913 ? 12% sched_debug.cpu.max_idle_balance_cost.stddev
0.09 ? 5% mpstat.cpu.all.iowait%
0.99 ? 15% mpstat.cpu.all.irq%
0.11 ? 7% mpstat.cpu.all.soft%
6.25 ? 5% mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
91.75 vmstat.cpu.id
57683 ? 9% vmstat.io.bo
144316 ? 4% vmstat.system.cs
-3.7% 177862 vmstat.system.in
-91.4% 10386665 cpuidle.C1.time
145379 ? 2% cpuidle.C1.usage
-32.5% 7.544e+08 ? 36% cpuidle.C1E.time
-35.5% 2343511 ? 17% cpuidle.C1E.usage
43814 ? 13% cpuidle.POLL.usage
138691 ? 22% numa-meminfo.node0.Active
137337 ? 22% numa-meminfo.node0.Active(file)
2070 ? 17% numa-meminfo.node0.Shmem
19148 numa-meminfo.node1.Mapped
9316 ? 3% numa-meminfo.node1.Shmem
165861 ? 12% meminfo.Active
163902 ? 12% meminfo.Active(file)
-8.4% 254569 ? 5% meminfo.Inactive(file)
-8.8% 132486 ? 2% meminfo.KReclaimable
11493 ? 6% meminfo.PageTables
-8.8% 132486 ? 2% meminfo.SReclaimable
329601 ? 7% meminfo.max_used_kB
33818 ? 23% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_active_file
517.25 ? 17% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_shmem
33818 ? 23% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_active_file
138134 ? 6% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_other
4828 numa-vmstat.node1.nr_mapped
2329 ? 3% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_shmem
49788 ? 19% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_other
86390 ? 4% slabinfo.Acpi-State.active_objs
1709 ? 4% slabinfo.Acpi-State.active_slabs
87206 ? 4% slabinfo.Acpi-State.num_objs
1709 ? 4% slabinfo.Acpi-State.num_slabs
42571 ? 4% slabinfo.btrfs_delayed_node.active_objs
820.00 ? 4% slabinfo.btrfs_delayed_node.active_slabs
42646 ? 4% slabinfo.btrfs_delayed_node.num_objs
820.00 ? 4% slabinfo.btrfs_delayed_node.num_slabs
41914 ? 4% slabinfo.btrfs_inode.active_objs
1498 ? 4% slabinfo.btrfs_inode.active_slabs
41960 ? 4% slabinfo.btrfs_inode.num_objs
1498 ? 4% slabinfo.btrfs_inode.num_slabs
186.00 slabinfo.numa_policy.active_objs
3.00 slabinfo.numa_policy.active_slabs
186.00 slabinfo.numa_policy.num_objs
3.00 slabinfo.numa_policy.num_slabs
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_mmap.vm_mmap_pgoff.ksys_mmap_pgoff.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.mmap_region.do_mmap.vm_mmap_pgoff.ksys_mmap_pgoff.do_syscall_64
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__mmap
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__mmap
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ksys_mmap_pgoff.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__mmap
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__mmap
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vm_mmap_pgoff.ksys_mmap_pgoff.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__mmap
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.mmput.do_exit.do_group_exit.get_signal.arch_do_signal
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.exit_mmap.mmput.do_exit.do_group_exit.get_signal
0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.terminate_walk
0.24 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dput
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_mmap
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ksys_mmap_pgoff
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.mmap_region
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vm_mmap_pgoff
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__mmap
2.08 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.kmem_cache_alloc
-7.4% 489.25 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_active_anon
40420 ? 12% proc-vmstat.nr_active_file
72337 proc-vmstat.nr_anon_pages
-8.3% 270555 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_dirtied
-5.9% 364434 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages
74599 proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_anon
63402 ? 6% proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file
19492 proc-vmstat.nr_kernel_stack
2868 ? 6% proc-vmstat.nr_page_table_pages
2846 proc-vmstat.nr_shmem
32980 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_slab_reclaimable
-8.4% 270491 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_written
-7.4% 489.25 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_anon
40420 ? 12% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_file
74599 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_anon
63402 ? 6% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file
-6.9% 468198 proc-vmstat.numa_hit
-7.3% 437027 proc-vmstat.numa_local
20122 ? 3% proc-vmstat.pgactivate
-7.8% 488229 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
110251 ? 3% proc-vmstat.pgfault
432965 ? 18% proc-vmstat.pgfree
688368 ? 4% proc-vmstat.pgpgout
4834 ? 3% proc-vmstat.pgreuse
8.00 ? 9% perf-stat.i.MPKI
-18.5% 1.057e+08 ? 11% perf-stat.i.cache-references
187045 ? 4% perf-stat.i.context-switches
1.89 ? 2% perf-stat.i.cpi
-32.0% 2.511e+10 ? 5% perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
0.02 ? 34% perf-stat.i.dTLB-load-miss-rate%
744250 ? 36% perf-stat.i.dTLB-load-misses
0.01 ? 26% perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
116408 ? 28% perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-misses
-10.4% 3695563 ? 3% perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses
-6.4% 6740171 ? 2% perf-stat.i.iTLB-loads
3623 ? 5% perf-stat.i.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
0.57 ? 2% perf-stat.i.ipc
0.26 ? 5% perf-stat.i.metric.GHz
10184 ? 2% perf-stat.i.minor-faults
502376 ? 7% perf-stat.i.node-stores
10185 ? 2% perf-stat.i.page-faults
7.93 ? 8% perf-stat.overall.MPKI
1.89 perf-stat.overall.cpi
0.02 ? 32% perf-stat.overall.dTLB-load-miss-rate%
0.01 ? 25% perf-stat.overall.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
35.41 perf-stat.overall.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
3600 ? 5% perf-stat.overall.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
0.53 perf-stat.overall.ipc
-21.2% 95004833 ? 11% perf-stat.ps.cache-references
168237 ? 4% perf-stat.ps.context-switches
86363 perf-stat.ps.cpu-clock
-34.3% 2.258e+10 ? 4% perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
668298 ? 35% perf-stat.ps.dTLB-load-misses
104604 ? 27% perf-stat.ps.dTLB-store-misses
-13.3% 3325031 ? 3% perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses
-9.5% 6063638 ? 2% perf-stat.ps.iTLB-loads
9159 ? 2% perf-stat.ps.minor-faults
451688 ? 6% perf-stat.ps.node-stores
9160 ? 2% perf-stat.ps.page-faults
86363 perf-stat.ps.task-clock
-28.8% 1.203e+11 ? 3% perf-stat.total.instructions
76304 interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
888.00 ? 51% interrupts.CPU0.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
20996 ? 5% interrupts.CPU0.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
62.00 ? 15% interrupts.CPU0.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1263 ? 31% interrupts.CPU1.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
20748 ? 8% interrupts.CPU1.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
66.75 ? 34% interrupts.CPU1.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
971.75 ? 15% interrupts.CPU10.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
20937 ? 5% interrupts.CPU10.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
82.75 ? 31% interrupts.CPU10.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
903.00 ? 6% interrupts.CPU11.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21107 ? 6% interrupts.CPU11.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
59.75 ? 15% interrupts.CPU11.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
961.00 ? 4% interrupts.CPU12.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21050 ? 6% interrupts.CPU12.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
72.50 ? 12% interrupts.CPU12.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
942.50 ? 13% interrupts.CPU13.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21105 ? 6% interrupts.CPU13.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
81.25 ? 22% interrupts.CPU13.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1114 ? 10% interrupts.CPU14.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21111 ? 6% interrupts.CPU14.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
89.25 ? 19% interrupts.CPU14.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
808.50 ? 30% interrupts.CPU15.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
20971 ? 6% interrupts.CPU15.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
83.00 ? 22% interrupts.CPU15.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
912.00 ? 20% interrupts.CPU16.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
20766 ? 7% interrupts.CPU16.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
76.25 ? 16% interrupts.CPU16.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
20991 ? 6% interrupts.CPU17.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21122 ? 6% interrupts.CPU18.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21058 ? 6% interrupts.CPU19.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
928.25 ? 12% interrupts.CPU2.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21065 ? 6% interrupts.CPU2.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
72.00 ? 26% interrupts.CPU2.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
893.00 ? 14% interrupts.CPU20.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21082 ? 6% interrupts.CPU20.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
54.25 ? 47% interrupts.CPU20.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1093 ? 28% interrupts.CPU21.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21054 ? 6% interrupts.CPU21.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
80.50 ? 31% interrupts.CPU21.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
876.25 ? 17% interrupts.CPU22.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21112 ? 6% interrupts.CPU22.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
62.50 ? 18% interrupts.CPU22.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1035 ? 20% interrupts.CPU23.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21049 ? 6% interrupts.CPU23.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
82.00 ? 27% interrupts.CPU23.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
20905 ? 7% interrupts.CPU24.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
544.50 ? 15% interrupts.CPU25.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21102 ? 6% interrupts.CPU25.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21082 ? 6% interrupts.CPU26.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21025 ? 6% interrupts.CPU27.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21079 ? 6% interrupts.CPU28.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
20984 ? 6% interrupts.CPU29.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
998.50 ? 20% interrupts.CPU3.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21107 ? 6% interrupts.CPU3.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
70.25 ? 40% interrupts.CPU3.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
21040 ? 6% interrupts.CPU30.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21052 ? 6% interrupts.CPU31.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21057 ? 6% interrupts.CPU32.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21059 ? 6% interrupts.CPU33.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21078 ? 6% interrupts.CPU34.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21066 ? 6% interrupts.CPU35.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21053 ? 6% interrupts.CPU36.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21019 ? 6% interrupts.CPU37.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21048 ? 6% interrupts.CPU38.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21052 ? 6% interrupts.CPU39.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
1151 ? 29% interrupts.CPU4.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21045 ? 6% interrupts.CPU4.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
67.00 ? 42% interrupts.CPU4.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
21035 ? 6% interrupts.CPU40.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21055 ? 6% interrupts.CPU41.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21056 ? 6% interrupts.CPU42.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21042 ? 6% interrupts.CPU43.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21026 ? 6% interrupts.CPU44.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21056 ? 6% interrupts.CPU45.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21043 ? 6% interrupts.CPU46.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21078 ? 6% interrupts.CPU47.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
964.25 ? 26% interrupts.CPU48.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21027 ? 6% interrupts.CPU48.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
69.25 ? 41% interrupts.CPU48.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
843.00 ? 16% interrupts.CPU49.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21097 ? 6% interrupts.CPU49.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
60.75 ? 42% interrupts.CPU49.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1127 ? 27% interrupts.CPU5.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21128 ? 6% interrupts.CPU5.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
77.25 ? 36% interrupts.CPU5.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
907.00 ? 19% interrupts.CPU50.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21071 ? 6% interrupts.CPU50.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
66.25 ? 42% interrupts.CPU50.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
960.00 ? 24% interrupts.CPU51.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21299 ? 6% interrupts.CPU51.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
64.50 ? 35% interrupts.CPU51.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
931.00 ? 4% interrupts.CPU52.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21120 ? 6% interrupts.CPU52.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
76.25 ? 14% interrupts.CPU52.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
792.50 ? 16% interrupts.CPU53.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21024 ? 6% interrupts.CPU53.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
66.00 ? 30% interrupts.CPU53.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
938.50 ? 12% interrupts.CPU54.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21109 ? 6% interrupts.CPU54.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
76.25 ? 19% interrupts.CPU54.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
862.50 ? 11% interrupts.CPU55.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21107 ? 6% interrupts.CPU55.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
51.75 ? 13% interrupts.CPU55.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
709.00 ? 18% interrupts.CPU56.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21115 ? 6% interrupts.CPU56.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
56.25 ? 32% interrupts.CPU56.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1088 ? 29% interrupts.CPU57.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21102 ? 6% interrupts.CPU57.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
82.50 ? 54% interrupts.CPU57.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
907.00 ? 30% interrupts.CPU58.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21101 ? 6% interrupts.CPU58.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
65.25 ? 46% interrupts.CPU58.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1026 ? 13% interrupts.CPU59.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21111 ? 6% interrupts.CPU59.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
77.00 ? 23% interrupts.CPU59.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1065 ? 11% interrupts.CPU6.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21111 ? 6% interrupts.CPU6.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
96.50 ? 37% interrupts.CPU6.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
808.25 ? 12% interrupts.CPU60.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21025 ? 6% interrupts.CPU60.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
60.00 ? 38% interrupts.CPU60.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1080 ? 18% interrupts.CPU61.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21105 ? 6% interrupts.CPU61.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
85.25 ? 31% interrupts.CPU61.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
855.75 ? 7% interrupts.CPU62.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21030 ? 6% interrupts.CPU62.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
60.75 ? 21% interrupts.CPU62.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
21103 ? 6% interrupts.CPU63.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
79.50 ? 15% interrupts.CPU63.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
874.50 ? 6% interrupts.CPU64.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21079 ? 6% interrupts.CPU64.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
73.25 ? 13% interrupts.CPU64.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
925.25 ? 7% interrupts.CPU65.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21044 ? 6% interrupts.CPU65.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
67.00 ? 13% interrupts.CPU65.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1006 ? 14% interrupts.CPU66.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21100 ? 6% interrupts.CPU66.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
88.50 ? 14% interrupts.CPU66.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
21118 ? 6% interrupts.CPU67.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
81.25 ? 8% interrupts.CPU67.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1002 ? 17% interrupts.CPU68.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21297 ? 7% interrupts.CPU68.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
86.25 ? 18% interrupts.CPU68.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
826.00 ? 18% interrupts.CPU69.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21094 ? 6% interrupts.CPU69.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
78.25 ? 50% interrupts.CPU69.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1003 ? 16% interrupts.CPU7.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
20850 ? 3% interrupts.CPU7.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
71.00 ? 29% interrupts.CPU7.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
902.50 ? 20% interrupts.CPU70.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21057 ? 6% interrupts.CPU70.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
77.25 ? 36% interrupts.CPU70.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
925.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU71.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21099 ? 6% interrupts.CPU71.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
67.75 ? 24% interrupts.CPU71.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
21051 ? 6% interrupts.CPU72.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21079 ? 6% interrupts.CPU73.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21100 ? 6% interrupts.CPU74.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21097 ? 6% interrupts.CPU75.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21100 ? 6% interrupts.CPU76.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21101 ? 6% interrupts.CPU77.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21095 ? 6% interrupts.CPU78.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21077 ? 6% interrupts.CPU79.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
1114 ? 17% interrupts.CPU8.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
21001 ? 7% interrupts.CPU8.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
88.75 ? 21% interrupts.CPU8.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
21051 ? 6% interrupts.CPU80.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21049 ? 6% interrupts.CPU81.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21067 ? 6% interrupts.CPU82.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21023 ? 6% interrupts.CPU83.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21055 ? 6% interrupts.CPU84.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21050 ? 6% interrupts.CPU85.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21053 ? 6% interrupts.CPU86.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21080 ? 6% interrupts.CPU87.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21071 ? 6% interrupts.CPU88.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21028 ? 6% interrupts.CPU89.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21113 ? 6% interrupts.CPU9.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
61.75 ? 45% interrupts.CPU9.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
21084 ? 6% interrupts.CPU90.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21006 ? 6% interrupts.CPU91.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21091 ? 6% interrupts.CPU92.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21181 ? 6% interrupts.CPU93.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21159 ? 6% interrupts.CPU94.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
21096 ? 6% interrupts.CPU95.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
-29.9% 2022083 ? 6% interrupts.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
4292 ? 3% interrupts.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts

fsmark.time.system_time

-------------------------------------------------+
+++.+++ ++++.++++ ++.++++ +++.+++ ++++.++ +++++.+++|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O OOO O OOOOO O OO O |
O O O OOO O O OO |
-------------------------------------------------+

fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got

-------------------------------------------------+
++ ++ ++ ++++ +.+ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ + +++|
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O O |
OOOOOO O OOOOO OOOOOOO O O |
O OO OO O |
|
-------------------------------------------------+

fsmark.time.elapsed_time

-------------------------------------------------+
|
+ + .++ +. + +. + +. + +. + + +. |
+++ + ++++ + ++++ + ++++ + + ++ +++|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O OO O O O |
O O O O OOOOO O OOO O |
OOOO O |
|
-------------------------------------------------+

fsmark.time.elapsed_time.max

-------------------------------------------------+
|
+ + .++ +. + +. + +. + +. + + +. |
+++ + ++++ + ++++ + ++++ + + ++ +++|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O OO O O O |
O O O O OOOOO O OOO O |
OOOO O |
|
-------------------------------------------------+

fsmark.time.voluntary_context_switches

-------------------------------------------------+
+ ++ + + + + .++ ++ |
+ ++++++ +++.+++ ++++++ +++++ ++ +|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O OOOO OO OOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOO O |
O |
-------------------------------------------------+

fsmark.files_per_sec

-------------------------------------------------+
|
O O O |
OOO O O |
O O O OOOO O O |
O O O O OOO O |
O O |
|
|
|
|
|
++++++++++.++++++++++.++++++++++.+++++|
+ |
-------------------------------------------------+

************************************************************************
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 512G memory
==============================================================
isk/filesize/fs/iterations/kconfig/nr_directories/nr_files_per_directory/nr_threads/rootfs/sync_method/tbox_group/test_size/testcase/ucode:
/btrfs/1x/x86_64-rhel-8.3/16d/256fpd/32t/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/fsyncBeforeClose/lkp-csl-2sp7/400M/fsmark/0x5002f01
fix potential overflow in cluster_pages_for_defrag on 32bit arch")
switch extent buffer tree lock to rw_semaphore")
e83fd45ee08a85c2e
-----------------
%stddev
\
462103 ? 5% fsmark.app_overhead
11366 ? 3% fsmark.files_per_sec
444.00 ? 3% fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
23.17 ? 2% fsmark.time.system_time
340937 ? 8% fsmark.time.voluntary_context_switches
138675 ? 4% softirqs.RCU
219173 softirqs.SCHED
109270 ? 6% vmstat.io.bo
119833 ? 8% vmstat.system.cs
91.86 iostat.cpu.idle
1.92 ? 8% iostat.cpu.iowait
5.08 ? 4% iostat.cpu.system
2.47 ? 7% mpstat.cpu.all.iowait%
1.06 ? 6% mpstat.cpu.all.irq%
4.69 ? 7% mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
264135 ? 4% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
92882 ? 7% numa-numastat.node1.local_node
103865 ? 7% numa-numastat.node1.numa_hit
17096 ? 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.avg
10993 ? 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.min
-21.00 sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.min
1772 ? 2% meminfo.Active(anon)
+9.9% 23318528 ? 4% meminfo.DirectMap2M
7137 ? 17% meminfo.Dirty
464774 ? 5% meminfo.max_used_kB
-9.4% 443.00 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_active_anon
1757 ? 16% proc-vmstat.nr_dirty
2807 proc-vmstat.nr_shmem
-9.4% 443.00 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_anon
1617 ? 4% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_write_pending
-82.2% 11239499 ? 4% cpuidle.C1.time
125019 ? 2% cpuidle.C1.usage
-12.0% 5.817e+08 ? 4% cpuidle.C1E.time
-26.4% 1549637 cpuidle.C1E.usage
131378 ? 3% cpuidle.POLL.time
35316 ? 8% cpuidle.POLL.usage
318.00 ? 20% slabinfo.biovec-128.active_objs
318.00 ? 20% slabinfo.biovec-128.num_objs
1467 ? 16% slabinfo.biovec-64.active_objs
1467 ? 16% slabinfo.biovec-64.num_objs
3595 ? 5% slabinfo.dmaengine-unmap-16.active_objs
3597 ? 4% slabinfo.dmaengine-unmap-16.num_objs
8424 ? 7% slabinfo.fsnotify_mark_connector.active_objs
8424 ? 7% slabinfo.fsnotify_mark_connector.num_objs
155.00 ? 20% slabinfo.numa_policy.active_objs
155.00 ? 20% slabinfo.numa_policy.num_objs
1700 ? 9% slabinfo.skbuff_fclone_cache.active_objs
1700 ? 9% slabinfo.skbuff_fclone_cache.num_objs
246991 ? 4% numa-meminfo.node0.AnonPages
6824 ? 7% numa-meminfo.node0.Dirty
456134 ? 6% numa-meminfo.node0.Inactive
247897 ? 4% numa-meminfo.node0.Inactive(anon)
208236 ? 9% numa-meminfo.node0.Inactive(file)
14136 numa-meminfo.node0.Mapped
11362 ? 7% numa-meminfo.node0.PageTables
+7.9% 128962 ? 2% numa-meminfo.node0.SUnreclaim
9848 ? 31% numa-meminfo.node1.Active
8910 ? 39% numa-meminfo.node1.Active(file)
570.50 ? 54% numa-meminfo.node1.Dirty
91270 ? 9% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive
15004 ? 52% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive(file)
19495 numa-meminfo.node1.Mapped
-18.8% 1025804 ? 4% numa-meminfo.node1.MemUsed
78384 ? 3% numa-meminfo.node1.SUnreclaim
9281 ? 2% numa-meminfo.node1.Shmem
119352 ? 9% numa-meminfo.node1.Slab
31692 ? 12% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_active_file
62334 ? 4% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_anon_pages
90938 ? 8% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_dirtied
1754 ? 11% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_dirty
62556 ? 4% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_inactive_anon
53639 ? 6% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_inactive_file
2900 ? 4% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_page_table_pages
32297 ? 2% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_slab_unreclaimable
89408 ? 8% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_written
31687 ? 12% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_active_file
62556 ? 4% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_inactive_anon
53639 ? 6% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_inactive_file
2360 ? 43% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_active_file
7908 ? 41% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_dirtied
137.50 ? 53% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_dirty
4010 ? 58% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_inactive_file
4983 ? 2% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_mapped
2319 ? 2% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_shmem
19568 ? 3% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_slab_unreclaimable
7832 ? 40% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_written
2360 ? 43% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_active_file
4010 ? 58% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_inactive_file
76.25 ? 92% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_write_pending
0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.read
0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.bprm_execve.do_execveat_common.__x64_sys_execve.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.exec_binprm.bprm_execve.do_execveat_common.__x64_sys_execve.do_syscall_64
0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.load_elf_binary.exec_binprm.bprm_execve.do_execveat_common.__x64_sys_execve
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__lxstat64
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__lxstat64
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.link_path_walk.path_lookupat.filename_lookup.vfs_statx.__do_sys_newlstat
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__do_sys_newlstat.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__lxstat64
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.page_remove_rmap.zap_pte_range.unmap_page_range.unmap_vmas.exit_mmap
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.filename_lookup.vfs_statx.__do_sys_newlstat.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.path_lookupat.filename_lookup.vfs_statx.__do_sys_newlstat.do_syscall_64
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vfs_statx.__do_sys_newlstat.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__lxstat64
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__lxstat64
5.36 ?173% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.show_interrupts.seq_read.proc_reg_read.vfs_read.ksys_read
0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.read
0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_execve
0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_execveat_common
0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.bprm_execve
0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.exec_binprm
0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.load_elf_binary
1.39 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.lockref_get_not_dead
1.78 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__legitimize_path
1.78 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unlazy_walk
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__do_sys_newlstat
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.page_remove_rmap
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__lxstat64
5.36 ?173% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.show_interrupts
1.39 ?173% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.lockref_get_not_dead
2.27 ?173% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.page_remove_rmap
8.58 ? 4% perf-stat.i.MPKI
2.74 ? 6% perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
-41.8% 10910993 ? 29% perf-stat.i.cache-misses
-14.1% 1.081e+08 ? 2% perf-stat.i.cache-references
167177 ? 3% perf-stat.i.context-switches
1.73 ? 2% perf-stat.i.cpi
-23.4% 2.163e+10 perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
727.08 ? 27% perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations
0.02 ? 4% perf-stat.i.dTLB-load-miss-rate%
133779 ? 5% perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-misses
39.61 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
-11.4% 3800208 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses
-15.3% 6354604 perf-stat.i.iTLB-loads
3404 ? 7% perf-stat.i.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
0.64 ? 5% perf-stat.i.ipc
0.22 perf-stat.i.metric.GHz
15531 ? 5% perf-stat.i.minor-faults
76.32 ? 8% perf-stat.i.node-load-miss-rate%
-63.4% 2023764 ? 47% perf-stat.i.node-load-misses
442256 ? 15% perf-stat.i.node-loads
49.27 ? 20% perf-stat.i.node-store-miss-rate%
744999 ? 45% perf-stat.i.node-store-misses
600128 perf-stat.i.node-stores
15532 ? 5% perf-stat.i.page-faults
8.49 ? 7% perf-stat.overall.MPKI
2.81 ? 8% perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
10.11 ? 30% perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate%
1.70 ? 5% perf-stat.overall.cpi
0.03 ? 5% perf-stat.overall.dTLB-load-miss-rate%
37.41 perf-stat.overall.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
3371 ? 7% perf-stat.overall.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
0.59 ? 5% perf-stat.overall.ipc
79.27 ? 9% perf-stat.overall.node-load-miss-rate%
52.32 ? 22% perf-stat.overall.node-store-miss-rate%
-10.3% 61424359 ? 13% perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
-44.8% 9057139 ? 29% perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
-18.5% 89825260 ? 2% perf-stat.ps.cache-references
139009 ? 3% perf-stat.ps.context-switches
79818 perf-stat.ps.cpu-clock
-27.3% 1.797e+10 perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
602.64 ? 27% perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations
614094 ? 3% perf-stat.ps.dTLB-load-misses
-16.0% 3156866 perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses
-19.6% 5281681 perf-stat.ps.iTLB-loads
12869 ? 5% perf-stat.ps.minor-faults
-65.3% 1680351 ? 47% perf-stat.ps.node-load-misses
367024 ? 15% perf-stat.ps.node-loads
618693 ? 45% perf-stat.ps.node-store-misses
498452 ? 2% perf-stat.ps.node-stores
12870 ? 5% perf-stat.ps.page-faults
79818 perf-stat.ps.task-clock
-24.3% 6.483e+10 ? 5% perf-stat.total.instructions
62464 interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13594 interrupts.CPU0.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
40.75 ? 28% interrupts.CPU0.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1079 ? 31% interrupts.CPU1.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13648 interrupts.CPU1.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
56.25 ? 31% interrupts.CPU1.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
820.50 ? 5% interrupts.CPU10.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13650 interrupts.CPU10.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
50.25 ? 12% interrupts.CPU10.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
648.50 ? 12% interrupts.CPU11.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13448 ? 2% interrupts.CPU11.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
35.75 ? 42% interrupts.CPU11.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
725.75 ? 12% interrupts.CPU12.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13502 interrupts.CPU12.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
39.25 ? 20% interrupts.CPU12.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
749.75 ? 8% interrupts.CPU13.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13705 interrupts.CPU13.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
47.75 ? 14% interrupts.CPU13.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
13627 interrupts.CPU14.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
698.00 ? 14% interrupts.CPU15.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13896 interrupts.CPU15.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
44.50 ? 41% interrupts.CPU15.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
743.25 ? 13% interrupts.CPU16.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13622 interrupts.CPU16.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
45.00 ? 18% interrupts.CPU16.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
638.50 ? 18% interrupts.CPU17.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13608 interrupts.CPU17.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
745.25 ? 24% interrupts.CPU18.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13575 interrupts.CPU18.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
805.50 ? 7% interrupts.CPU19.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13616 interrupts.CPU19.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
44.00 ? 11% interrupts.CPU19.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
771.75 ? 5% interrupts.CPU2.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13651 interrupts.CPU2.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
47.50 ? 17% interrupts.CPU2.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
13543 interrupts.CPU20.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
45.25 ? 19% interrupts.CPU20.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
692.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU21.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13603 interrupts.CPU21.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
42.50 ? 20% interrupts.CPU21.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
738.00 ? 3% interrupts.CPU22.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13387 interrupts.CPU22.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
38.75 ? 11% interrupts.CPU22.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
13593 interrupts.CPU23.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
33.75 ? 3% interrupts.CPU23.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
469.00 ? 10% interrupts.CPU24.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13552 interrupts.CPU24.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
397.25 ? 26% interrupts.CPU25.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13632 interrupts.CPU25.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
446.50 ? 8% interrupts.CPU26.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13471 ? 3% interrupts.CPU26.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
396.00 ? 18% interrupts.CPU27.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13622 interrupts.CPU27.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
461.25 ? 10% interrupts.CPU28.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13579 interrupts.CPU28.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
13593 interrupts.CPU29.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
726.25 ? 16% interrupts.CPU3.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13500 interrupts.CPU3.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
36.00 ? 28% interrupts.CPU3.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
441.00 ? 3% interrupts.CPU30.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13495 interrupts.CPU30.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
439.00 ? 3% interrupts.CPU31.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13618 interrupts.CPU31.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
13611 interrupts.CPU32.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
460.50 ? 7% interrupts.CPU33.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13607 interrupts.CPU33.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
13620 interrupts.CPU34.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
13512 interrupts.CPU35.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
459.75 ? 6% interrupts.CPU36.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13624 interrupts.CPU36.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
448.50 ? 3% interrupts.CPU37.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13578 interrupts.CPU37.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
442.50 ? 2% interrupts.CPU38.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13605 interrupts.CPU38.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
443.75 interrupts.CPU39.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13600 interrupts.CPU39.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
735.25 ? 13% interrupts.CPU4.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13653 interrupts.CPU4.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
42.00 ? 39% interrupts.CPU4.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
13467 interrupts.CPU40.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
476.00 ? 6% interrupts.CPU41.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13522 ? 2% interrupts.CPU41.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
461.25 ? 7% interrupts.CPU42.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13379 ? 4% interrupts.CPU42.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
13573 interrupts.CPU43.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
472.25 ? 8% interrupts.CPU44.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13640 interrupts.CPU44.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
464.00 ? 7% interrupts.CPU45.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13588 interrupts.CPU45.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
455.00 ? 5% interrupts.CPU46.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13599 interrupts.CPU46.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
455.25 ? 5% interrupts.CPU47.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13623 interrupts.CPU47.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
660.25 ? 16% interrupts.CPU48.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13565 interrupts.CPU48.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
33.00 ? 39% interrupts.CPU48.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
726.25 ? 4% interrupts.CPU49.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13596 interrupts.CPU49.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
42.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU49.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
697.50 ? 14% interrupts.CPU5.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13795 interrupts.CPU5.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
50.75 ? 54% interrupts.CPU5.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
731.50 ? 10% interrupts.CPU50.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13623 interrupts.CPU50.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
37.00 ? 20% interrupts.CPU50.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
779.25 ? 7% interrupts.CPU51.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13638 interrupts.CPU51.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
59.25 ? 30% interrupts.CPU51.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
780.50 ? 4% interrupts.CPU52.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13620 interrupts.CPU52.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
49.75 ? 20% interrupts.CPU52.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
13610 interrupts.CPU53.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
49.75 ? 10% interrupts.CPU53.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
13627 interrupts.CPU54.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
39.50 ? 23% interrupts.CPU54.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
814.00 ? 6% interrupts.CPU55.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13620 interrupts.CPU55.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
13628 interrupts.CPU56.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
46.75 ? 26% interrupts.CPU56.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
772.75 ? 12% interrupts.CPU57.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13624 interrupts.CPU57.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
46.75 ? 21% interrupts.CPU57.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
778.25 ? 5% interrupts.CPU58.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13652 interrupts.CPU58.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
40.25 ? 16% interrupts.CPU58.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
736.50 ? 6% interrupts.CPU59.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13644 interrupts.CPU59.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
44.00 ? 21% interrupts.CPU59.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
774.00 ? 3% interrupts.CPU6.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13659 interrupts.CPU6.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
41.75 ? 30% interrupts.CPU6.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
766.25 ? 9% interrupts.CPU60.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13619 interrupts.CPU60.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
46.50 ? 15% interrupts.CPU60.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
729.25 ? 10% interrupts.CPU61.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13557 interrupts.CPU61.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
43.25 ? 17% interrupts.CPU61.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
828.75 ? 18% interrupts.CPU62.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13626 interrupts.CPU62.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
55.00 ? 30% interrupts.CPU62.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
822.00 ? 3% interrupts.CPU63.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13617 interrupts.CPU63.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
46.50 ? 19% interrupts.CPU63.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
773.00 ? 9% interrupts.CPU64.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13440 ? 2% interrupts.CPU64.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
47.50 ? 24% interrupts.CPU64.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
13652 interrupts.CPU65.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
59.75 ? 24% interrupts.CPU65.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
835.75 ? 8% interrupts.CPU66.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13637 interrupts.CPU66.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
43.75 ? 25% interrupts.CPU66.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
751.50 ? 10% interrupts.CPU67.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13592 interrupts.CPU67.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
42.50 ? 37% interrupts.CPU67.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
777.00 ? 6% interrupts.CPU68.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13565 interrupts.CPU68.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
45.25 ? 21% interrupts.CPU68.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
804.00 ? 16% interrupts.CPU69.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13578 interrupts.CPU69.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
40.50 ? 33% interrupts.CPU69.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
789.00 ? 10% interrupts.CPU7.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13622 interrupts.CPU7.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
49.50 ? 16% interrupts.CPU7.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
731.25 ? 6% interrupts.CPU70.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13621 interrupts.CPU70.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
39.00 ? 21% interrupts.CPU70.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
728.00 ? 5% interrupts.CPU71.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13540 interrupts.CPU71.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
41.75 ? 14% interrupts.CPU71.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
449.50 ? 4% interrupts.CPU72.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13604 interrupts.CPU72.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
449.00 ? 5% interrupts.CPU73.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13801 ? 3% interrupts.CPU73.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
463.00 ? 6% interrupts.CPU74.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13604 interrupts.CPU74.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
13630 interrupts.CPU75.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
446.50 ? 4% interrupts.CPU76.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13612 interrupts.CPU76.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
458.25 ? 2% interrupts.CPU77.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13635 interrupts.CPU77.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
471.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU78.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13627 interrupts.CPU78.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
455.75 ? 6% interrupts.CPU79.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13616 interrupts.CPU79.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
796.00 ? 20% interrupts.CPU8.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13627 interrupts.CPU8.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
40.00 ? 23% interrupts.CPU8.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
458.50 ? 6% interrupts.CPU80.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13629 interrupts.CPU80.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
474.50 ? 6% interrupts.CPU81.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13633 interrupts.CPU81.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
455.25 ? 5% interrupts.CPU82.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13631 interrupts.CPU82.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
454.00 ? 4% interrupts.CPU83.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13623 interrupts.CPU83.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
444.50 interrupts.CPU84.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13618 interrupts.CPU84.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
451.75 ? 2% interrupts.CPU85.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13626 interrupts.CPU85.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
462.00 ? 4% interrupts.CPU86.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13633 interrupts.CPU86.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
13630 interrupts.CPU87.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
452.25 ? 2% interrupts.CPU88.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13629 interrupts.CPU88.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
459.25 ? 3% interrupts.CPU89.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13626 interrupts.CPU89.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
750.00 interrupts.CPU9.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13534 interrupts.CPU9.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
41.00 ? 14% interrupts.CPU9.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
451.50 ? 4% interrupts.CPU90.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13589 interrupts.CPU90.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
461.50 ? 8% interrupts.CPU91.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13437 interrupts.CPU91.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
404.00 ? 22% interrupts.CPU92.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13617 interrupts.CPU92.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
451.00 ? 8% interrupts.CPU93.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13628 interrupts.CPU93.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
441.25 ? 4% interrupts.CPU94.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13546 interrupts.CPU94.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
439.00 ? 3% interrupts.CPU95.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
13644 interrupts.CPU95.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
-22.3% 1305760 interrupts.LOC:Local_timer_interrupts
2947 ? 4% interrupts.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
may affect actual performance.

Attachments:

(No filename) (75.94 kB)
config-5.10.0-rc2-00022-gfac2f60d5fe8 (173.93 kB)
job-script (8.36 kB)
job.yaml (5.88 kB)
reproduce (1.04 kB)
Download all attachments

2020-11-10 14:13:40

by David Sterba

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: [btrfs] fac2f60d5f: fsmark.files_per_sec 62.6% improvement

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 02:00:12PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a 62.6% improvement of fsmark.files_per_sec due to commit:
>
>
> commit: fac2f60d5fe83fd45ee08a85c2eb7a09659edbe3 ("btrfs: switch extent buffer tree lock to rw_semaphore")

Thanks for the report, that's a significant improvement, confirming the
trend that switching the locks does not regress. I've skimmed other
collected stats and it seems like an overall improvement, so the effects
should be noticeable for other metadata-heavy workloads too.