Duplicate the current UV procfs leaves to the uv_sysfs driver so they show
up under /sys/firmware/sgi_uv. Show a 'deprecated' warning message if
any of the old /proc/sgi_uv leaves are used.
These patches depend on the prior set sent by Justin Ernst <[email protected]>
x86/platform/uv: Remove existing /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/ interface
x86/platform/uv: Add and export uv_bios_* functions
x86/platform/uv: Add new uv_sysfs platform driver
x86/platform/uv: Update ABI documentation of /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/
x86/platform/uv: Update MAINTAINERS for uv_sysfs driver
Mike Travis (5):
x86/platform/uv: Add kernel interfaces for obtaining system info.
x86/platform/uv: Add sysfs leaves to replace those in procfs
x86/platform/uv: Add sysfs hubless leaves
x86/platform/uv: Add deprecated messages to /proc info leaves
x86/platform/uv: Update sysfs document file
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv | 16 +++++
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h | 2 +
arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 38 +++++++++-
drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.21.0
Update sysfs Document file to include moved /proc leaves.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv
index ca5cdccdb1a8..fa7f7aefa5ed 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv
@@ -7,9 +7,24 @@ Description:
Under that directory are a number of read-only attributes:
+ archtype
+ hub_type
+ hubless
partition_id
uv_type
+ The archtype entry contains the UV architecture type that
+ is used to select arch-dependent addresses and features.
+ If can be set via the OEM_ID in the ACPI MADT table or by
+ UVsystab entry both passed from UV BIOS.
+
+ The hub_type entry is used to select the type of hub which is
+ similar to uv_type but encoded in a binary format. Include
+ the file uv_hub.h to get the definitions.
+
+ The hubless entry basically is present and set only if there
+ is no hub. In this case the hub_type entry is not present.
+
The partition_id entry contains the partition id.
UV systems can be partitioned into multiple physical
machines, which each partition running a unique copy
@@ -18,6 +33,7 @@ Description:
The uv_type entry contains the hub revision number.
This value can be used to identify the UV system version:
+ "0.*" = Hubless UV ('*' is subtype)
"3.0" = UV2
"5.0" = UV3
"7.0" = UV4
--
2.21.0
Add uv_sysfs leaves to display the info.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <[email protected]>
---
drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c b/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c
index 6de360370f0e..6729ea8b63d2 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c
@@ -729,14 +729,32 @@ static ssize_t uv_type_show(struct kobject *kobj,
return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", uv_type_string());
}
+static ssize_t uv_archtype_show(struct kobject *kobj,
+ struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ return uv_get_archtype(buf, PAGE_SIZE);
+}
+
+static ssize_t uv_hub_type_show(struct kobject *kobj,
+ struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%x\n", uv_hub_type());
+}
+
static struct kobj_attribute partition_id_attr =
__ATTR(partition_id, 0444, partition_id_show, NULL);
static struct kobj_attribute uv_type_attr =
__ATTR(uv_type, 0444, uv_type_show, NULL);
+static struct kobj_attribute uv_archtype_attr =
+ __ATTR(archtype, 0444, uv_archtype_show, NULL);
+static struct kobj_attribute uv_hub_type_attr =
+ __ATTR(hub_type, 0444, uv_hub_type_show, NULL);
static struct attribute *base_attrs[] = {
&partition_id_attr.attr,
&uv_type_attr.attr,
+ &uv_archtype_attr.attr,
+ &uv_hub_type_attr.attr,
NULL,
};
--
2.21.0
Add "deprecated" message to any access to old /proc/sgi_uv/* leaves.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
index 48746031b39a..bfd77a00c2a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
@@ -1615,21 +1615,45 @@ static void check_efi_reboot(void)
reboot_type = BOOT_ACPI;
}
-/* Setup user proc fs files */
+/*
+ * User proc fs file handling now deprecated.
+ * Recommend using /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/... instead.
+ */
+static void proc_print_msg(int *flag, char *what, char *which)
+{
+ if (*flag)
+ return;
+
+ pr_notice(
+ "%s: using deprecated /proc/sgi_uv/%s, use /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/%s\n",
+ current->comm, what, which ? which : what);
+
+ *flag = 1;
+}
+
static int __maybe_unused proc_hubbed_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
{
+ static int flag;
+
+ proc_print_msg(&flag, "hubbed", "hub_type");
seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubbed_system);
return 0;
}
static int __maybe_unused proc_hubless_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
{
+ static int flag;
+
+ proc_print_msg(&flag, "hubless", NULL);
seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubless_system);
return 0;
}
static int __maybe_unused proc_archtype_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
{
+ static int flag;
+
+ proc_print_msg(&flag, "archtype", NULL);
seq_printf(file, "%s/%s\n", uv_archtype, oem_table_id);
return 0;
}
--
2.21.0
Add uv_sysfs hubless leaves for UV hubless systems.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <[email protected]>
---
drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c b/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c
index 6729ea8b63d2..5aa1addf3598 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ static const char *uv_type_string(void)
return "5.0";
else if (is_uv2_hub())
return "3.0";
+ else if (uv_get_hubless_system())
+ return "0.1";
else
return "unknown";
}
@@ -741,6 +743,12 @@ static ssize_t uv_hub_type_show(struct kobject *kobj,
return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%x\n", uv_hub_type());
}
+static ssize_t uv_hubless_show(struct kobject *kobj,
+ struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%x\n", uv_get_hubless_system());
+}
+
static struct kobj_attribute partition_id_attr =
__ATTR(partition_id, 0444, partition_id_show, NULL);
static struct kobj_attribute uv_type_attr =
@@ -749,6 +757,8 @@ static struct kobj_attribute uv_archtype_attr =
__ATTR(archtype, 0444, uv_archtype_show, NULL);
static struct kobj_attribute uv_hub_type_attr =
__ATTR(hub_type, 0444, uv_hub_type_show, NULL);
+static struct kobj_attribute uv_hubless_attr =
+ __ATTR(hubless, 0444, uv_hubless_show, NULL);
static struct attribute *base_attrs[] = {
&partition_id_attr.attr,
@@ -795,11 +805,36 @@ static int initial_bios_setup(void)
return 0;
}
+static struct attribute *hubless_base_attrs[] = {
+ &partition_id_attr.attr,
+ &uv_type_attr.attr,
+ &uv_archtype_attr.attr,
+ &uv_hubless_attr.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group hubless_base_attr_group = {
+ .attrs = hubless_base_attrs
+};
+
+
+static int __init uv_sysfs_hubless_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = sysfs_create_group(sgi_uv_kobj, &hubless_base_attr_group);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_warn("sysfs_create_group hubless_base_attr_group failed\n");
+ kobject_put(sgi_uv_kobj);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int __init uv_sysfs_init(void)
{
int ret = 0;
- if (!is_uv_system())
+ if (!is_uv_system() && !uv_get_hubless_system())
return -ENODEV;
num_cnodes = uv_num_possible_blades();
@@ -810,6 +845,10 @@ static int __init uv_sysfs_init(void)
pr_warn("kobject_create_and_add sgi_uv failed\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ if (uv_get_hubless_system())
+ return uv_sysfs_hubless_init();
+
ret = sysfs_create_group(sgi_uv_kobj, &base_attr_group);
if (ret) {
pr_warn("sysfs_create_group base_attr_group failed\n");
@@ -847,10 +886,19 @@ static int __init uv_sysfs_init(void)
return ret;
}
+static void __exit uv_sysfs_hubless_exit(void)
+{
+ sysfs_remove_group(sgi_uv_kobj, &hubless_base_attr_group);
+ kobject_put(sgi_uv_kobj);
+}
+
static void __exit uv_sysfs_exit(void)
{
- if (!is_uv_system())
+ if (!is_uv_system()) {
+ if (uv_get_hubless_system())
+ uv_sysfs_hubless_exit();
return;
+ }
pci_topology_exit();
uv_ports_exit();
--
2.21.0
Hi,
On 11/25/20 6:29 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
> Add "deprecated" message to any access to old /proc/sgi_uv/* leaves.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
> index 48746031b39a..bfd77a00c2a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
> @@ -1615,21 +1615,45 @@ static void check_efi_reboot(void)
> reboot_type = BOOT_ACPI;
> }
>
> -/* Setup user proc fs files */
> +/*
> + * User proc fs file handling now deprecated.
> + * Recommend using /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/... instead.
> + */
> +static void proc_print_msg(int *flag, char *what, char *which)
> +{
> + if (*flag)
> + return;
> +
> + pr_notice(
> + "%s: using deprecated /proc/sgi_uv/%s, use /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/%s\n",
> + current->comm, what, which ? which : what);
> +
> + *flag = 1;
> +}
> +
You have just re-invented pr_notice_once, please just use pr_notice_once
directly in the _show functions.
Regards,
Hans
> static int __maybe_unused proc_hubbed_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
> {
> + static int flag;
> +
> + proc_print_msg(&flag, "hubbed", "hub_type");
> seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubbed_system);
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int __maybe_unused proc_hubless_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
> {
> + static int flag;
> +
> + proc_print_msg(&flag, "hubless", NULL);
> seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubless_system);
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int __maybe_unused proc_archtype_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
> {
> + static int flag;
> +
> + proc_print_msg(&flag, "archtype", NULL);
> seq_printf(file, "%s/%s\n", uv_archtype, oem_table_id);
> return 0;
> }
>
Hi,
On 11/25/20 6:29 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
>
> Duplicate the current UV procfs leaves to the uv_sysfs driver so they show
> up under /sys/firmware/sgi_uv. Show a 'deprecated' warning message if
> any of the old /proc/sgi_uv leaves are used.
>
> These patches depend on the prior set sent by Justin Ernst <[email protected]>
> x86/platform/uv: Remove existing /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/ interface
> x86/platform/uv: Add and export uv_bios_* functions
> x86/platform/uv: Add new uv_sysfs platform driver
> x86/platform/uv: Update ABI documentation of /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/
> x86/platform/uv: Update MAINTAINERS for uv_sysfs driver
>
> Mike Travis (5):
> x86/platform/uv: Add kernel interfaces for obtaining system info.
> x86/platform/uv: Add sysfs leaves to replace those in procfs
> x86/platform/uv: Add sysfs hubless leaves
> x86/platform/uv: Add deprecated messages to /proc info leaves
> x86/platform/uv: Update sysfs document file
>
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv | 16 +++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 38 +++++++++-
> drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
This series depends on the:
[PATCH v3 0/5] x86/platform/uv: Add uv_sysfs platform driver
Series, next time when such a thing is the case, please add a note
about this to the cover letter.
Like with the "[PATCH v3 0/5] x86/platform/uv: Add uv_sysfs platform driver" series,
this series too should be merged in its entirety through the x86/tip tree (once the
other series is merged). Please also add this info to the cover letter.
I've one remark to patch 4 (which I send in a reply to that). So a v2 is going
to be necessary. Please include the above bits in the v2 cover-letter.
Regards,
Hans
On 11/26/2020 2:44 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/25/20 6:29 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
>>
>> Duplicate the current UV procfs leaves to the uv_sysfs driver so they show
>> up under /sys/firmware/sgi_uv. Show a 'deprecated' warning message if
>> any of the old /proc/sgi_uv leaves are used.
>>
>> These patches depend on the prior set sent by Justin Ernst <[email protected]>
>> x86/platform/uv: Remove existing /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/ interface
>> x86/platform/uv: Add and export uv_bios_* functions
>> x86/platform/uv: Add new uv_sysfs platform driver
>> x86/platform/uv: Update ABI documentation of /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/
>> x86/platform/uv: Update MAINTAINERS for uv_sysfs driver
>>
>> Mike Travis (5):
>> x86/platform/uv: Add kernel interfaces for obtaining system info.
>> x86/platform/uv: Add sysfs leaves to replace those in procfs
>> x86/platform/uv: Add sysfs hubless leaves
>> x86/platform/uv: Add deprecated messages to /proc info leaves
>> x86/platform/uv: Update sysfs document file
>>
>> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv | 16 +++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h | 2 +
>> arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 38 +++++++++-
>> drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++-
>> 4 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> This series depends on the:
>
> [PATCH v3 0/5] x86/platform/uv: Add uv_sysfs platform driver
>
> Series, next time when such a thing is the case, please add a note
> about this to the cover letter.
>
> Like with the "[PATCH v3 0/5] x86/platform/uv: Add uv_sysfs platform driver" series,
> this series too should be merged in its entirety through the x86/tip tree (once the
> other series is merged). Please also add this info to the cover letter.
>
> I've one remark to patch 4 (which I send in a reply to that). So a v2 is going
> to be necessary. Please include the above bits in the v2 cover-letter.
I was just about to send a notice that Justin changed the underlying
patch that these depend on. (I was gone late Wednesday and all day
yesterday). That will be done later today, thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
On 11/26/2020 2:45 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/25/20 6:29 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
>> Add "deprecated" message to any access to old /proc/sgi_uv/* leaves.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
>> index 48746031b39a..bfd77a00c2a1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
>> @@ -1615,21 +1615,45 @@ static void check_efi_reboot(void)
>> reboot_type = BOOT_ACPI;
>> }
>>
>> -/* Setup user proc fs files */
>> +/*
>> + * User proc fs file handling now deprecated.
>> + * Recommend using /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/... instead.
>> + */
>> +static void proc_print_msg(int *flag, char *what, char *which)
>> +{
>> + if (*flag)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + pr_notice(
>> + "%s: using deprecated /proc/sgi_uv/%s, use /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/%s\n",
>> + current->comm, what, which ? which : what);
>> +
>> + *flag = 1;
>> +}
>> +
>
> You have just re-invented pr_notice_once, please just use pr_notice_once
> directly in the _show functions.
I tried it both ways (actually with rate limiting as well). The problem
with using a static check in the error print function it will only print
the first instance it encounters, not all of the references.
If I move it to the final output I need to replicate the verbiage of the
format for every instance as you can't seem to combine the KERN_* level
of printing and the pr_fmt reference of the format string. I tried a
few ways including just putting everything into a format character list.
But what used to work (indirect format pointer) doesn't any more. Or
I didn't hit on the correct combination of KERN_* level and indirect
format string.
The last combination was no print limiting which caused of course the
error message to be output on every occurrence. (NASA has 35,000
customers for their big systems, that's a lot of potential console
messages.) This really annoys them and we would get calls from those
that don't have any means of changing this so they ask us.
So I just chose this method of accomplishing all goals, except of course
using the higher level of print function (pr_notice_once). But if you
think method two ("use pr_notice_once directly in the _show function")
is most favorable I will switch to that. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
>> static int __maybe_unused proc_hubbed_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
>> {
>> + static int flag;
>> +
>> + proc_print_msg(&flag, "hubbed", "hub_type");
>> seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubbed_system);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int __maybe_unused proc_hubless_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
>> {
>> + static int flag;
>> +
>> + proc_print_msg(&flag, "hubless", NULL);
>> seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubless_system);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int __maybe_unused proc_archtype_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
>> {
>> + static int flag;
>> +
>> + proc_print_msg(&flag, "archtype", NULL);
>> seq_printf(file, "%s/%s\n", uv_archtype, oem_table_id);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
Hi,
On 11/27/20 3:58 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
>
>
> On 11/26/2020 2:45 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/25/20 6:29 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
>>> Add "deprecated" message to any access to old /proc/sgi_uv/* leaves.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> ? arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> ? 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
>>> index 48746031b39a..bfd77a00c2a1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
>>> @@ -1615,21 +1615,45 @@ static void check_efi_reboot(void)
>>> ????????? reboot_type = BOOT_ACPI;
>>> ? }
>>> ? -/* Setup user proc fs files */
>>> +/*
>>> + * User proc fs file handling now deprecated.
>>> + * Recommend using /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/... instead.
>>> + */
>>> +static void proc_print_msg(int *flag, char *what, char *which)
>>> +{
>>> +??? if (*flag)
>>> +??????? return;
>>> +
>>> +??? pr_notice(
>>> +??????? "%s: using deprecated /proc/sgi_uv/%s, use /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/%s\n",
>>> +??????? current->comm, what, which ? which : what);
>>> +
>>> +??? *flag = 1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> You have just re-invented pr_notice_once, please just use pr_notice_once
>> directly in the _show functions.
>
> I tried it both ways (actually with rate limiting as well).? The problem with using a static check in the error print function it will only print the first instance it encounters, not all of the references.
>
> If I move it to the final output I need to replicate the verbiage of the format for every instance as you can't seem to combine the KERN_* level of printing and the pr_fmt reference of the format string.? I tried a few ways including just putting everything into a format character list. ?But what used to work (indirect format pointer) doesn't any more.? Or I didn't hit on the correct combination of KERN_* level and indirect format string.
>
> The last combination was no print limiting which caused of course the error message to be output on every occurrence.? (NASA has 35,000 customers for their big systems, that's a lot of potential console messages.)? This really annoys them and we would get calls from those that don't have any means of changing this so they ask us.
>
> So I just chose this method of accomplishing all goals, except of course using the higher level of print function (pr_notice_once).? But if you think method two ("use pr_notice_once directly in the _show function") is most favorable I will switch to that.
Yeah I think using that is much better then reinventing it, you can simply just write
out the 3 different messages which you are "formatting" now as static strings so you get:
pr_notice_once("%s: using deprecated /proc/sgi_uv/hubbed, use /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/hub_type\n", current->comm);
pr_notice_once("%s: using deprecated /proc/sgi_uv/hubless, use /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/hubless\n", current->comm);
pr_notice_once("%s: using deprecated /proc/sgi_uv/archtype, use /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/archtype\n", current->comm);
Regards,
Hans
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ? static int __maybe_unused proc_hubbed_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
>>> ? {
>>> +??? static int flag;
>>> +
>>> +??? proc_print_msg(&flag, "hubbed", "hub_type");
>>> ????? seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubbed_system);
>>> ????? return 0;
>>> ? }
>>> ? ? static int __maybe_unused proc_hubless_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
>>> ? {
>>> +??? static int flag;
>>> +
>>> +??? proc_print_msg(&flag, "hubless", NULL);
>>> ????? seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubless_system);
>>> ????? return 0;
>>> ? }
>>> ? ? static int __maybe_unused proc_archtype_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
>>> ? {
>>> +??? static int flag;
>>> +
>>> +??? proc_print_msg(&flag, "archtype", NULL);
>>> ????? seq_printf(file, "%s/%s\n", uv_archtype, oem_table_id);
>>> ????? return 0;
>>> ? }
>>>
>>
>