Herbert,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 02:00:04PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:49:41PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >
> > In my patch series I initially had registered the akciphers under the names
> > ecc-nist-p192 and ecc-nist-p256 but now, in V4, joined them together as
> > 'ecdsa'. This may be too generic for a name. Maybe it should be called
> > ecsda-nist for the NIST family.
>
> What I'm proposing is specifying the curve in the name as well, i.e.,
> ecdsa-nist-p192 instead of just ecdsa or ecdsa-nist.
>
> This simplifies the task of handling hardware that only supports a
> subset of curves.
So, if some implementation supports multiple curves (like EC-RDSA
currently supports 5 curves), it should add 5 ecrdsa-{a,b,c,..}
algorithms with actually the same top level implementation?
Right?
> There is a parallel discussion of exactly what curves we should
> support in the kernel. Personally if there is a user in the kernel
> for it then I'm happy to see it added. In your specific case, as
> long as your use of the algorithm in x509 is accepted then I don't
> have any problems with adding support in the Crypto API.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Email: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt