2021-02-07 23:37:26

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the pidfd tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:

fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c

between commit:

f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts")

from the pidfd tree and commit:

7317a03df703 ("xfs: refactor inode ownership change transaction/inode/quota allocation idiom")

from the xfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
index 3d4c7ca080fb,248083ea0276..000000000000
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
@@@ -1280,9 -1275,9 +1280,10 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax
*/
static struct xfs_trans *
xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(
- struct file *file)
- struct xfs_inode *ip,
++ struct file *file,
+ struct xfs_dquot *pdqp)
{
+ struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(file_inode(file));
struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
struct xfs_trans *tp;
int error = -EROFS;
@@@ -1470,9 -1461,9 +1469,9 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr

xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, fa);

- tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file);
- tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, pdqp);
++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file, pdqp);
if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
- code = PTR_ERR(tp);
+ error = PTR_ERR(tp);
goto error_free_dquots;
}

@@@ -1615,7 -1599,7 +1606,7 @@@ xfs_ioc_setxflags

xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, &fa);

- tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp);
- tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, NULL);
++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
error = PTR_ERR(tp);
goto out_drop_write;


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2021-02-14 23:34:58

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the pidfd tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:33:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
>
> between commit:
>
> f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts")
>
> from the pidfd tree and commit:
>
> 7317a03df703 ("xfs: refactor inode ownership change transaction/inode/quota allocation idiom")
>
> from the xfs tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index 3d4c7ca080fb,248083ea0276..000000000000
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@@ -1280,9 -1275,9 +1280,10 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax
> */
> static struct xfs_trans *
> xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(
> - struct file *file)
> - struct xfs_inode *ip,
> ++ struct file *file,
> + struct xfs_dquot *pdqp)
> {
> + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(file_inode(file));
> struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> struct xfs_trans *tp;
> int error = -EROFS;
> @@@ -1470,9 -1461,9 +1469,9 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr
>
> xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, fa);
>
> - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file);
> - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, pdqp);
> ++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file, pdqp);
> if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
> - code = PTR_ERR(tp);
> + error = PTR_ERR(tp);
> goto error_free_dquots;
> }
>
> @@@ -1615,7 -1599,7 +1606,7 @@@ xfs_ioc_setxflags
>
> xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, &fa);
>
> - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp);
> - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, NULL);
> ++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
> error = PTR_ERR(tp);
> goto out_drop_write;

With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2021-02-14 23:52:23

by Darrick J. Wong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the pidfd tree

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:41:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:33:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts")
> >
> > from the pidfd tree and commit:
> >
> > 7317a03df703 ("xfs: refactor inode ownership change transaction/inode/quota allocation idiom")
> >
> > from the xfs tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.

Oops, sorry, this email fell off my radar. Your fixup looks good to me;
thanks for the reminder.

--D

> >
> > diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > index 3d4c7ca080fb,248083ea0276..000000000000
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > @@@ -1280,9 -1275,9 +1280,10 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax
> > */
> > static struct xfs_trans *
> > xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(
> > - struct file *file)
> > - struct xfs_inode *ip,
> > ++ struct file *file,
> > + struct xfs_dquot *pdqp)
> > {
> > + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(file_inode(file));
> > struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> > struct xfs_trans *tp;
> > int error = -EROFS;
> > @@@ -1470,9 -1461,9 +1469,9 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr
> >
> > xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, fa);
> >
> > - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file);
> > - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, pdqp);
> > ++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file, pdqp);
> > if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
> > - code = PTR_ERR(tp);
> > + error = PTR_ERR(tp);
> > goto error_free_dquots;
> > }
> >
> > @@@ -1615,7 -1599,7 +1606,7 @@@ xfs_ioc_setxflags
> >
> > xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, &fa);
> >
> > - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp);
> > - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, NULL);
> > ++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
> > error = PTR_ERR(tp);
> > goto out_drop_write;
>
> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> conflict still exists.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell


2021-02-21 22:59:45

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the pidfd tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:41:31 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:33:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts")
> >
> > from the pidfd tree and commit:
> >
> > 7317a03df703 ("xfs: refactor inode ownership change transaction/inode/quota allocation idiom")
> >
> > from the xfs tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > index 3d4c7ca080fb,248083ea0276..000000000000
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > @@@ -1280,9 -1275,9 +1280,10 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax
> > */
> > static struct xfs_trans *
> > xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(
> > - struct file *file)
> > - struct xfs_inode *ip,
> > ++ struct file *file,
> > + struct xfs_dquot *pdqp)
> > {
> > + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(file_inode(file));
> > struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> > struct xfs_trans *tp;
> > int error = -EROFS;
> > @@@ -1470,9 -1461,9 +1469,9 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr
> >
> > xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, fa);
> >
> > - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file);
> > - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, pdqp);
> > ++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file, pdqp);
> > if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
> > - code = PTR_ERR(tp);
> > + error = PTR_ERR(tp);
> > goto error_free_dquots;
> > }
> >
> > @@@ -1615,7 -1599,7 +1606,7 @@@ xfs_ioc_setxflags
> >
> > xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, &fa);
> >
> > - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp);
> > - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, NULL);
> > ++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
> > error = PTR_ERR(tp);
> > goto out_drop_write;
>
> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> conflict still exists.

This is now a conflict between the pidfd tree and Linus' tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature