In case of error, the function devm_regmap_init_sdw() returns ERR_PTR()
and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check should
be replaced with IS_ERR().
Fixes: a262057df513 ("ASoC: rt1316: Add RT1316 SDCA vendor-specific driver")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/codecs/rt1316-sdw.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt1316-sdw.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt1316-sdw.c
index a6fb34a48f33..3b029c56467d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt1316-sdw.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt1316-sdw.c
@@ -669,8 +669,8 @@ static int rt1316_sdw_probe(struct sdw_slave *slave,
/* Regmap Initialization */
regmap = devm_regmap_init_sdw(slave, &rt1316_sdw_regmap);
- if (!regmap)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (IS_ERR(regmap))
+ return PTR_ERR(regmap);
return rt1316_sdw_init(&slave->dev, regmap, slave);
}
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 06:40:41 +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In case of error, the function devm_regmap_init_sdw() returns ERR_PTR()
> and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check should
> be replaced with IS_ERR().
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: rt1316: Fix return value check in rt1316_sdw_probe()
commit: f87aec4585c3cf0853ba20637bb8c6bdd2689c46
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark