After the refactoring phase, the type of max_slot has changed from unsigned
long to unsigned int. The return type of the function get_max_slots() and
the 4th argument type of iommu_is_span_boundary() are different from the
type of max_slot. Finally, asserts BUG_ON in iommu_is_span_boundary().
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Fixes: 567d877f9a7d ("swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_tbl_map_single")
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <[email protected]>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 369e4c3..c10e855 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int find_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
unsigned long boundary_mask = dma_get_seg_boundary(dev);
dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr =
phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, io_tlb_start) & boundary_mask;
- unsigned int max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
+ unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
unsigned int iotlb_align_mask =
dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride;
--
2.7.4
On 3/2/21 12:21 PM, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> After the refactoring phase, the type of max_slot has changed from unsigned
> long to unsigned int. The return type of the function get_max_slots() and
> the 4th argument type of iommu_is_span_boundary() are different from the
> type of max_slot. Finally, asserts BUG_ON in iommu_is_span_boundary().
>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 567d877f9a7d ("swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_tbl_map_single")
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <[email protected]>
I think this is all good. Looking at Linus's master I see:
537 unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
?
> ---
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 369e4c3..c10e855 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int find_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
> unsigned long boundary_mask = dma_get_seg_boundary(dev);
> dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr =
> phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, io_tlb_start) & boundary_mask;
> - unsigned int max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
> + unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
> unsigned int iotlb_align_mask =
> dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
> unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride;
>
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 15:20:08 -0500
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/2/21 12:21 PM, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> > After the refactoring phase, the type of max_slot has changed from unsigned
> > long to unsigned int. The return type of the function get_max_slots() and
> > the 4th argument type of iommu_is_span_boundary() are different from the
> > type of max_slot. Finally, asserts BUG_ON in iommu_is_span_boundary().
> > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> > Fixes: 567d877f9a7d ("swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_tbl_map_single")
> > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <[email protected]>
>
> I think this is all good. Looking at Linus's master I see:
>
>
> 537 unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
>
> ?
Thanks for the information, and sorry for that.
I found it in next-20210226:
567d877f9a7d ("swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_tbl_map_single")
And it has already fixed in next-20210301:
26a7e094783d ("swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_tbl_map_single")
$ git diff 567d877f9a7d..26a7e094783d
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 381c24e..6962cb4 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int find_slots(struct device *dev, size_t alloc_size)
unsigned long boundary_mask = dma_get_seg_boundary(dev);
dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr =
phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, io_tlb_start) & boundary_mask;
- unsigned int max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
+ unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride = 1;
unsigned int index, wrap, count = 0, i;
unsigned long flags;
Thank you,
---
Best Regards,
Kunihiko Hayashi