The snd_soc_dai_ops structures is only stored in the ops field of a
snd_soc_dai_driver structure, so make the snd_soc_dai_ops structure
const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/codecs/cx2072x.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cx2072x.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cx2072x.c
index d924e3528029..1f5c57fab1d8 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/cx2072x.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cx2072x.c
@@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ static const struct snd_soc_component_driver soc_codec_driver_cx2072x = {
/*
* DAI ops
*/
-static struct snd_soc_dai_ops cx2072x_dai_ops = {
+static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops cx2072x_dai_ops = {
.set_sysclk = cx2072x_set_dai_sysclk,
.set_fmt = cx2072x_set_dai_fmt,
.hw_params = cx2072x_hw_params,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:26:56 +0800, Ye Bin wrote:
> The snd_soc_dai_ops structures is only stored in the ops field of a
> snd_soc_dai_driver structure, so make the snd_soc_dai_ops structure
> const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: cx2072x: constify static struct snd_soc_dai_ops
commit: e9a216d8f14ac4d926078885e7e772db08e6aad9
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark