2022-01-07 02:35:24

by Yang Yingliang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -next] dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix missing unlock in at_xdmac_tasklet()

Add the missing unlock before return from at_xdmac_tasklet().

Fixes: e77e561925df ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix race over irq_status")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
index a1da2b4b6d73..1476156af74b 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
@@ -1681,8 +1681,10 @@ static void at_xdmac_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
__func__, atchan->irq_status);

if (!(atchan->irq_status & AT_XDMAC_CIS_LIS) &&
- !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask))
+ !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask)) {
+ spin_unlock_irq(&atchan->lock);
return;
+ }

if (atchan->irq_status & error_mask)
at_xdmac_handle_error(atchan);
--
2.25.1



2022-01-07 07:26:26

by Tudor Ambarus

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix missing unlock in at_xdmac_tasklet()

On 1/7/22 4:40 AM, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Add the missing unlock before return from at_xdmac_tasklet().
>
> Fixes: e77e561925df ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix race over irq_status")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> index a1da2b4b6d73..1476156af74b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> @@ -1681,8 +1681,10 @@ static void at_xdmac_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> __func__, atchan->irq_status);
>
> if (!(atchan->irq_status & AT_XDMAC_CIS_LIS) &&
> - !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask))
> + !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask)) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&atchan->lock);
> return;

oh yes, thanks!
you can directly return spin_unlock_irq(&atchan->lock); to avoid the extra braces.
Anyway, it's good:
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <[email protected]>

> + }
>
> if (atchan->irq_status & error_mask)
> at_xdmac_handle_error(atchan);
> --
> 2.25.1
>

2022-02-15 08:49:09

by Vinod Koul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix missing unlock in at_xdmac_tasklet()

On 07-01-22, 10:40, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> Add the missing unlock before return from at_xdmac_tasklet().

Applied, thanks

>
> Fixes: e77e561925df ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix race over irq_status")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> index a1da2b4b6d73..1476156af74b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> @@ -1681,8 +1681,10 @@ static void at_xdmac_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> __func__, atchan->irq_status);
>
> if (!(atchan->irq_status & AT_XDMAC_CIS_LIS) &&
> - !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask))
> + !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask)) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&atchan->lock);
> return;
> + }
>
> if (atchan->irq_status & error_mask)
> at_xdmac_handle_error(atchan);
> --
> 2.25.1

--
~Vinod