Syzbot found a GPF in reweight_entity. This has been bisected to commit
4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group")
There is a race between sched_post_fork() and setpriority(PRIO_PGRP)
within a thread group that causes a null-ptr-deref in reweight_entity()
in CFS. The scenario is that the main process spawns number of new
threads, which then call setpriority(PRIO_PGRP, 0, -20), wait, and exit.
For each of the new threads the copy_process() gets invoked, which adds
the new task_struct and calls sched_post_fork() for it.
In the above scenario there is a possibility that setpriority(PRIO_PGRP)
and set_one_prio() will be called for a thread in the group that is just
being created by copy_process(), and for which the sched_post_fork() has
not been executed yet. This will trigger a null pointer dereference in
reweight_entity(), as it will try to access the run queue pointer, which
hasn't been set. This results it a crash as shown below:
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000000a0-0x00000000000000a7]
CPU: 0 PID: 2392 Comm: reduced_repro Not tainted 5.16.0-11201-gb42c5a161ea3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35
RIP: 0010:reweight_entity+0x15d/0x440
RSP: 0018:ffffc900035dfcf8 EFLAGS: 00010006
Call Trace:
<TASK>
reweight_task+0xde/0x1c0
set_load_weight+0x21c/0x2b0
set_user_nice.part.0+0x2d1/0x519
set_user_nice.cold+0x8/0xd
set_one_prio+0x24f/0x263
__do_sys_setpriority+0x2d3/0x640
__x64_sys_setpriority+0x84/0x8b
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
</TASK>
---[ end trace 9dc80a9d378ed00a ]---
Before the mentioned change the cfs_rq pointer for the task has been
set in sched_fork(), which is called much earlier in copy_process(),
before the new task is added to the thread_group.
Now it is done in the sched_post_fork(), which is called after that.
To fix the issue the remove the update_load param from the
update_load param() function and call reweight_task() only if the task
flag doesn't have the TASK_NEW flag set.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Segall <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhang Qiao <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d9c27adc674e3a7932b22b61c79a02da82cbdc1
Fixes: 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v5:
- Changed the order of local variables declaration in set_load_weight
to comply with the coding standard
Changes in v4:
- Removed the update_load param from set_load_weight() and call
reweight_task() based on the TASK_NEW flag
Changes in v3:
- Removed the new check and changed the update_load condition from
always true to true if p->state != TASK_NEW
Changes in v2:
- Added a check in set_user_nice(), and return from there if the task
is not fully setup instead of returning from reweight_entity()
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 848eaa0efe0e..fcf0c180617c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1214,8 +1214,9 @@ int tg_nop(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
}
#endif
-static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p, bool update_load)
+static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p)
{
+ bool update_load = !(READ_ONCE(p->__state) & TASK_NEW);
int prio = p->static_prio - MAX_RT_PRIO;
struct load_weight *load = &p->se.load;
@@ -4406,7 +4407,7 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(0);
p->prio = p->normal_prio = p->static_prio;
- set_load_weight(p, false);
+ set_load_weight(p);
/*
* We don't need the reset flag anymore after the fork. It has
@@ -6921,7 +6922,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
put_prev_task(rq, p);
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
- set_load_weight(p, true);
+ set_load_weight(p);
old_prio = p->prio;
p->prio = effective_prio(p);
@@ -7212,7 +7213,7 @@ static void __setscheduler_params(struct task_struct *p,
*/
p->rt_priority = attr->sched_priority;
p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p);
- set_load_weight(p, true);
+ set_load_weight(p);
}
/*
@@ -9445,7 +9446,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
#endif
}
- set_load_weight(&init_task, false);
+ set_load_weight(&init_task);
/*
* The boot idle thread does lazy MMU switching as well:
--
2.34.1
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:18:46AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> Syzbot found a GPF in reweight_entity. This has been bisected to commit
> 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group")
>
> There?is a race between sched_post_fork() and setpriority(PRIO_PGRP)
> within a thread group that causes a null-ptr-deref?in reweight_entity()
> in CFS. The scenario is that the main process spawns number of new
> threads, which then call setpriority(PRIO_PGRP, 0, -20), wait, and exit.
> For each of the new threads the copy_process() gets invoked, which adds
> the new task_struct and calls sched_post_fork() for it.
>
> In the above scenario there is a possibility that setpriority(PRIO_PGRP)
> and set_one_prio() will be called for a thread in the group that is just
> being created by copy_process(), and for which the sched_post_fork() has
> not been executed yet. This will trigger a null pointer dereference in
> reweight_entity(),?as it will try to access the run queue pointer, which
> hasn't been set. This results it a crash as shown below:
>
>
> Before the mentioned change the cfs_rq pointer for the task has been
> set in sched_fork(), which is called much earlier in copy_process(),
> before the new task is added to the thread_group.
> Now it is done in the sched_post_fork(), which is called after that.
> To fix the issue the remove the update_load param from the
> update_load param() function and call reweight_task() only if the task
> flag doesn't have the TASK_NEW flag set.
>
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d9c27adc674e3a7932b22b61c79a02da82cbdc1
> Fixes: 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group")
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <[email protected]>
Thanks!
The following commit has been merged into the sched/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 13765de8148f71fa795e0a6607de37c49ea5915a
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/13765de8148f71fa795e0a6607de37c49ea5915a
Author: Tadeusz Struk <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:18:46 -08:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 22:37:26 +01:00
sched/fair: Fix fault in reweight_entity
Syzbot found a GPF in reweight_entity. This has been bisected to
commit 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid
sched_task_group")
There is a race between sched_post_fork() and setpriority(PRIO_PGRP)
within a thread group that causes a null-ptr-deref in
reweight_entity() in CFS. The scenario is that the main process spawns
number of new threads, which then call setpriority(PRIO_PGRP, 0, -20),
wait, and exit. For each of the new threads the copy_process() gets
invoked, which adds the new task_struct and calls sched_post_fork()
for it.
In the above scenario there is a possibility that
setpriority(PRIO_PGRP) and set_one_prio() will be called for a thread
in the group that is just being created by copy_process(), and for
which the sched_post_fork() has not been executed yet. This will
trigger a null pointer dereference in reweight_entity(), as it will
try to access the run queue pointer, which hasn't been set.
Before the mentioned change the cfs_rq pointer for the task has been
set in sched_fork(), which is called much earlier in copy_process(),
before the new task is added to the thread_group. Now it is done in
the sched_post_fork(), which is called after that. To fix the issue
the remove the update_load param from the update_load param() function
and call reweight_task() only if the task flag doesn't have the
TASK_NEW flag set.
Fixes: 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 848eaa0..fcf0c18 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1214,8 +1214,9 @@ int tg_nop(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
}
#endif
-static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p, bool update_load)
+static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p)
{
+ bool update_load = !(READ_ONCE(p->__state) & TASK_NEW);
int prio = p->static_prio - MAX_RT_PRIO;
struct load_weight *load = &p->se.load;
@@ -4406,7 +4407,7 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(0);
p->prio = p->normal_prio = p->static_prio;
- set_load_weight(p, false);
+ set_load_weight(p);
/*
* We don't need the reset flag anymore after the fork. It has
@@ -6921,7 +6922,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
put_prev_task(rq, p);
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
- set_load_weight(p, true);
+ set_load_weight(p);
old_prio = p->prio;
p->prio = effective_prio(p);
@@ -7212,7 +7213,7 @@ static void __setscheduler_params(struct task_struct *p,
*/
p->rt_priority = attr->sched_priority;
p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p);
- set_load_weight(p, true);
+ set_load_weight(p);
}
/*
@@ -9445,7 +9446,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
#endif
}
- set_load_weight(&init_task, false);
+ set_load_weight(&init_task);
/*
* The boot idle thread does lazy MMU switching as well: