Add compatibles and power-domain definitions for the sc8280xp and sa8540p
platforms.
Bjorn Andersson (3):
dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add sc8280xp RPMh power-domains
soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Don't warn about sparse rpmhpd arrays
soc: qcom: rpmhpd: add sc8280xp & sa8540p rpmh power-domains
.../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 2 +
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++-
include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 18 ++++++
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.35.1
The Qualcomm sc8280xp platform has 13 and the sa8540p platform has 11
power-domains. Add compatibles, the typically used ones power-domains
and their relevant active-only variants, to the RPMh power-domain
driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
---
Changes since v1:
- Added QPHY
- Split out sa8540
- Sorted the entries alphabetically
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
index f8d28e902942..05fff8691ee3 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
@@ -180,6 +180,36 @@ static struct rpmhpd mxc_ao = {
.res_name = "mxc.lvl",
};
+static struct rpmhpd nsp = {
+ .pd = { .name = "nsp", },
+ .res_name = "nsp.lvl",
+};
+
+static struct rpmhpd qphy = {
+ .pd = { .name = "qphy", },
+ .res_name = "qphy.lvl",
+};
+
+/* SA8540P RPMH powerdomains */
+static struct rpmhpd *sa8540p_rpmhpds[] = {
+ [SC8280XP_CX] = &cx,
+ [SC8280XP_CX_AO] = &cx_ao,
+ [SC8280XP_EBI] = &ebi,
+ [SC8280XP_GFX] = &gfx,
+ [SC8280XP_LCX] = &lcx,
+ [SC8280XP_LMX] = &lmx,
+ [SC8280XP_MMCX] = &mmcx,
+ [SC8280XP_MMCX_AO] = &mmcx_ao,
+ [SC8280XP_MX] = &mx,
+ [SC8280XP_MX_AO] = &mx_ao,
+ [SC8280XP_NSP] = &nsp,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmhpd_desc sa8540p_desc = {
+ .rpmhpds = sa8540p_rpmhpds,
+ .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sa8540p_rpmhpds),
+};
+
/* SDM845 RPMH powerdomains */
static struct rpmhpd *sdm845_rpmhpds[] = {
[SDM845_CX] = &cx_w_mx_parent,
@@ -378,10 +408,33 @@ static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc8180x_desc = {
.num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8180x_rpmhpds),
};
+/* SC8280xp RPMH powerdomains */
+static struct rpmhpd *sc8280xp_rpmhpds[] = {
+ [SC8280XP_CX] = &cx,
+ [SC8280XP_CX_AO] = &cx_ao,
+ [SC8280XP_EBI] = &ebi,
+ [SC8280XP_GFX] = &gfx,
+ [SC8280XP_LCX] = &lcx,
+ [SC8280XP_LMX] = &lmx,
+ [SC8280XP_MMCX] = &mmcx,
+ [SC8280XP_MMCX_AO] = &mmcx_ao,
+ [SC8280XP_MX] = &mx,
+ [SC8280XP_MX_AO] = &mx_ao,
+ [SC8280XP_NSP] = &nsp,
+ [SC8280XP_QPHY] = &qphy,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc8280xp_desc = {
+ .rpmhpds = sc8280xp_rpmhpds,
+ .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8280xp_rpmhpds),
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id rpmhpd_match_table[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sa8540p-rpmhpd", .data = &sa8540p_desc },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7180_desc },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7280_desc },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-rpmhpd", .data = &sc8180x_desc },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-rpmhpd", .data = &sc8280xp_desc },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd", .data = &sdm845_desc },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd", .data = &sdx55_desc},
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd", .data = &sdx65_desc},
--
2.35.1
In some cases the DT binding will fully describe the set of available
RPMh power-domains, but there is no reason for exposing them all in the
implementation.
Omitting individual data->domains is handle gracefully by
of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(), so there's no reason for printing a
warning when this occurs.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
---
Changes since v1:
- New patch
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
index 11102ac47769..f8d28e902942 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
@@ -613,10 +613,8 @@ static int rpmhpd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
data->num_domains = num_pds;
for (i = 0; i < num_pds; i++) {
- if (!rpmhpds[i]) {
- dev_warn(dev, "rpmhpds[%d] is empty\n", i);
+ if (!rpmhpds[i])
continue;
- }
rpmhpds[i]->dev = dev;
rpmhpds[i]->addr = cmd_db_read_addr(rpmhpds[i]->res_name);
--
2.35.1
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:35:05PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Add compatibles and power-domain definitions for the sc8280xp and sa8540p
> platforms.
>
> Bjorn Andersson (3):
> dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add sc8280xp RPMh power-domains
> soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Don't warn about sparse rpmhpd arrays
> soc: qcom: rpmhpd: add sc8280xp & sa8540p rpmh power-domains
Looks good. For the series:
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
Johan
The sc8280xp has 13 power-domains controlled through the RPMh, document
the compatible and provide definitions for the power-domains - and their
active-only variants where applicable.
The SA8540p differs slightly in the power domains exposed, so add a
separate compatible for this, but reuse the constants to allow sharing
the DeviceTree source.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
---
Changes since v1:
- Added sa8540p compatible
.../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 2 ++
include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
index b90c4427beec..ad77a6380f38 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
@@ -27,10 +27,12 @@ properties:
- qcom,msm8998-rpmpd
- qcom,qcm2290-rpmpd
- qcom,qcs404-rpmpd
+ - qcom,sa8540p-rpmhpd
- qcom,sdm660-rpmpd
- qcom,sc7180-rpmhpd
- qcom,sc7280-rpmhpd
- qcom,sc8180x-rpmhpd
+ - qcom,sc8280xp-rpmhpd
- qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
- qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd
- qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
index 0a8978d0c78c..6cce5b7aa940 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
@@ -125,6 +125,24 @@
#define SC8180X_MX 9
#define SC8180X_MX_AO 10
+/* SC8280XP Power Domain Indexes */
+#define SC8280XP_CX 0
+#define SC8280XP_CX_AO 1
+#define SC8280XP_DDR 2
+#define SC8280XP_EBI 3
+#define SC8280XP_GFX 4
+#define SC8280XP_LCX 5
+#define SC8280XP_LMX 6
+#define SC8280XP_MMCX 7
+#define SC8280XP_MMCX_AO 8
+#define SC8280XP_MSS 9
+#define SC8280XP_MX 10
+#define SC8280XP_MXC 12
+#define SC8280XP_MX_AO 11
+#define SC8280XP_NSP 13
+#define SC8280XP_QPHY 14
+#define SC8280XP_XO 15
+
/* SDM845 Power Domain performance levels */
#define RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_RETENTION 16
#define RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_MIN_SVS 48
--
2.35.1
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:35:08PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The Qualcomm sc8280xp platform has 13 and the sa8540p platform has 11
> power-domains. Add compatibles, the typically used ones power-domains
> and their relevant active-only variants, to the RPMh power-domain
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Added QPHY
> - Split out sa8540
> - Sorted the entries alphabetically
>
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> index f8d28e902942..05fff8691ee3 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> @@ -180,6 +180,36 @@ static struct rpmhpd mxc_ao = {
> .res_name = "mxc.lvl",
> };
>
> +static struct rpmhpd nsp = {
> + .pd = { .name = "nsp", },
> + .res_name = "nsp.lvl",
> +};
> +
> +static struct rpmhpd qphy = {
> + .pd = { .name = "qphy", },
> + .res_name = "qphy.lvl",
> +};
> +
> +/* SA8540P RPMH powerdomains */
> +static struct rpmhpd *sa8540p_rpmhpds[] = {
> + [SC8280XP_CX] = &cx,
> + [SC8280XP_CX_AO] = &cx_ao,
> + [SC8280XP_EBI] = &ebi,
> + [SC8280XP_GFX] = &gfx,
> + [SC8280XP_LCX] = &lcx,
> + [SC8280XP_LMX] = &lmx,
> + [SC8280XP_MMCX] = &mmcx,
> + [SC8280XP_MMCX_AO] = &mmcx_ao,
> + [SC8280XP_MX] = &mx,
> + [SC8280XP_MX_AO] = &mx_ao,
> + [SC8280XP_NSP] = &nsp,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmhpd_desc sa8540p_desc = {
> + .rpmhpds = sa8540p_rpmhpds,
> + .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sa8540p_rpmhpds),
> +};
> +
> /* SDM845 RPMH powerdomains */
> static struct rpmhpd *sdm845_rpmhpds[] = {
> [SDM845_CX] = &cx_w_mx_parent,
> @@ -378,10 +408,33 @@ static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc8180x_desc = {
> .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8180x_rpmhpds),
> };
>
> +/* SC8280xp RPMH powerdomains */
> +static struct rpmhpd *sc8280xp_rpmhpds[] = {
> + [SC8280XP_CX] = &cx,
> + [SC8280XP_CX_AO] = &cx_ao,
> + [SC8280XP_EBI] = &ebi,
> + [SC8280XP_GFX] = &gfx,
> + [SC8280XP_LCX] = &lcx,
> + [SC8280XP_LMX] = &lmx,
> + [SC8280XP_MMCX] = &mmcx,
> + [SC8280XP_MMCX_AO] = &mmcx_ao,
> + [SC8280XP_MX] = &mx,
> + [SC8280XP_MX_AO] = &mx_ao,
> + [SC8280XP_NSP] = &nsp,
> + [SC8280XP_QPHY] = &qphy,
> +};
The commit messages mention sc8280xp having 13 power domains, but here I
only count 12. Good chance I'm just missing something obvious (not
familiar with using power domains or rpmh) but I thought I should
highlight it in case that was an error.
I attempted to find where this sort of thing is defined downstream, but
failed :(
Thanks,
Andrew
> +
> +static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc8280xp_desc = {
> + .rpmhpds = sc8280xp_rpmhpds,
> + .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8280xp_rpmhpds),
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id rpmhpd_match_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sa8540p-rpmhpd", .data = &sa8540p_desc },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7180_desc },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7280_desc },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-rpmhpd", .data = &sc8180x_desc },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-rpmhpd", .data = &sc8280xp_desc },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd", .data = &sdm845_desc },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd", .data = &sdx55_desc},
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd", .data = &sdx65_desc},
> --
> 2.35.1
>
On 27/04/2022 01:35, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The sc8280xp has 13 power-domains controlled through the RPMh, document
> the compatible and provide definitions for the power-domains - and their
> active-only variants where applicable.
>
> The SA8540p differs slightly in the power domains exposed, so add a
> separate compatible for this, but reuse the constants to allow sharing
> the DeviceTree source.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 08:48:17AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed 27 Apr 05:38 PDT 2022, Andrew Halaney wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:35:08PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > The Qualcomm sc8280xp platform has 13 and the sa8540p platform has 11
> > > power-domains. Add compatibles, the typically used ones power-domains
> > > and their relevant active-only variants, to the RPMh power-domain
> > > driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > - Added QPHY
> > > - Split out sa8540
> > > - Sorted the entries alphabetically
> > >
> > > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > > index f8d28e902942..05fff8691ee3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > > @@ -180,6 +180,36 @@ static struct rpmhpd mxc_ao = {
> > > .res_name = "mxc.lvl",
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static struct rpmhpd nsp = {
> > > + .pd = { .name = "nsp", },
> > > + .res_name = "nsp.lvl",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static struct rpmhpd qphy = {
> > > + .pd = { .name = "qphy", },
> > > + .res_name = "qphy.lvl",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +/* SA8540P RPMH powerdomains */
> > > +static struct rpmhpd *sa8540p_rpmhpds[] = {
> > > + [SC8280XP_CX] = &cx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_CX_AO] = &cx_ao,
> > > + [SC8280XP_EBI] = &ebi,
> > > + [SC8280XP_GFX] = &gfx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_LCX] = &lcx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_LMX] = &lmx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_MMCX] = &mmcx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_MMCX_AO] = &mmcx_ao,
> > > + [SC8280XP_MX] = &mx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_MX_AO] = &mx_ao,
> > > + [SC8280XP_NSP] = &nsp,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct rpmhpd_desc sa8540p_desc = {
> > > + .rpmhpds = sa8540p_rpmhpds,
> > > + .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sa8540p_rpmhpds),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > /* SDM845 RPMH powerdomains */
> > > static struct rpmhpd *sdm845_rpmhpds[] = {
> > > [SDM845_CX] = &cx_w_mx_parent,
> > > @@ -378,10 +408,33 @@ static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc8180x_desc = {
> > > .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8180x_rpmhpds),
> > > };
> > >
> > > +/* SC8280xp RPMH powerdomains */
> > > +static struct rpmhpd *sc8280xp_rpmhpds[] = {
> > > + [SC8280XP_CX] = &cx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_CX_AO] = &cx_ao,
> > > + [SC8280XP_EBI] = &ebi,
> > > + [SC8280XP_GFX] = &gfx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_LCX] = &lcx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_LMX] = &lmx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_MMCX] = &mmcx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_MMCX_AO] = &mmcx_ao,
> > > + [SC8280XP_MX] = &mx,
> > > + [SC8280XP_MX_AO] = &mx_ao,
> > > + [SC8280XP_NSP] = &nsp,
> > > + [SC8280XP_QPHY] = &qphy,
> > > +};
> >
> > The commit messages mention sc8280xp having 13 power domains, but here I
> > only count 12. Good chance I'm just missing something obvious (not
> > familiar with using power domains or rpmh) but I thought I should
> > highlight it in case that was an error.
> >
>
> The "typically used ones" in the commit message "captures" that. Further
> more _AO is just a variant of the non-_AO resources, referring to votes
> that should only apply when the CPU subsystem is not power collapsed.
>
> So what you have in this list is 10 power domains.
>
> I added defines for all 13 in the DT binding, so comparing with that
> you'll see that the missing ones are DDR, MSS and XO. I don't see how we
> would use these from Linux today. So let's postpone adding them until we
> have a use case.
>
> > I attempted to find where this sort of thing is defined downstream, but
> > failed :(
> >
>
> In direwolf-regulators.dtsi you'll find entries with qcom,resource-name
> of "*.lvl". These resource names are matches against the Command DB
> registry, which you can dump using the cmd-db file in debugfs.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
Thanks, I really appreciate the explanation. This makes sense to me.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
> >
> > > +
> > > +static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc8280xp_desc = {
> > > + .rpmhpds = sc8280xp_rpmhpds,
> > > + .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8280xp_rpmhpds),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static const struct of_device_id rpmhpd_match_table[] = {
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sa8540p-rpmhpd", .data = &sa8540p_desc },
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7180_desc },
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7280_desc },
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-rpmhpd", .data = &sc8180x_desc },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-rpmhpd", .data = &sc8280xp_desc },
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd", .data = &sdm845_desc },
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd", .data = &sdx55_desc},
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd", .data = &sdx65_desc},
> > > --
> > > 2.35.1
> > >
> >
>
On Wed 27 Apr 05:38 PDT 2022, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:35:08PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > The Qualcomm sc8280xp platform has 13 and the sa8540p platform has 11
> > power-domains. Add compatibles, the typically used ones power-domains
> > and their relevant active-only variants, to the RPMh power-domain
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Added QPHY
> > - Split out sa8540
> > - Sorted the entries alphabetically
> >
> > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > index f8d28e902942..05fff8691ee3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > @@ -180,6 +180,36 @@ static struct rpmhpd mxc_ao = {
> > .res_name = "mxc.lvl",
> > };
> >
> > +static struct rpmhpd nsp = {
> > + .pd = { .name = "nsp", },
> > + .res_name = "nsp.lvl",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct rpmhpd qphy = {
> > + .pd = { .name = "qphy", },
> > + .res_name = "qphy.lvl",
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* SA8540P RPMH powerdomains */
> > +static struct rpmhpd *sa8540p_rpmhpds[] = {
> > + [SC8280XP_CX] = &cx,
> > + [SC8280XP_CX_AO] = &cx_ao,
> > + [SC8280XP_EBI] = &ebi,
> > + [SC8280XP_GFX] = &gfx,
> > + [SC8280XP_LCX] = &lcx,
> > + [SC8280XP_LMX] = &lmx,
> > + [SC8280XP_MMCX] = &mmcx,
> > + [SC8280XP_MMCX_AO] = &mmcx_ao,
> > + [SC8280XP_MX] = &mx,
> > + [SC8280XP_MX_AO] = &mx_ao,
> > + [SC8280XP_NSP] = &nsp,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct rpmhpd_desc sa8540p_desc = {
> > + .rpmhpds = sa8540p_rpmhpds,
> > + .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sa8540p_rpmhpds),
> > +};
> > +
> > /* SDM845 RPMH powerdomains */
> > static struct rpmhpd *sdm845_rpmhpds[] = {
> > [SDM845_CX] = &cx_w_mx_parent,
> > @@ -378,10 +408,33 @@ static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc8180x_desc = {
> > .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8180x_rpmhpds),
> > };
> >
> > +/* SC8280xp RPMH powerdomains */
> > +static struct rpmhpd *sc8280xp_rpmhpds[] = {
> > + [SC8280XP_CX] = &cx,
> > + [SC8280XP_CX_AO] = &cx_ao,
> > + [SC8280XP_EBI] = &ebi,
> > + [SC8280XP_GFX] = &gfx,
> > + [SC8280XP_LCX] = &lcx,
> > + [SC8280XP_LMX] = &lmx,
> > + [SC8280XP_MMCX] = &mmcx,
> > + [SC8280XP_MMCX_AO] = &mmcx_ao,
> > + [SC8280XP_MX] = &mx,
> > + [SC8280XP_MX_AO] = &mx_ao,
> > + [SC8280XP_NSP] = &nsp,
> > + [SC8280XP_QPHY] = &qphy,
> > +};
>
> The commit messages mention sc8280xp having 13 power domains, but here I
> only count 12. Good chance I'm just missing something obvious (not
> familiar with using power domains or rpmh) but I thought I should
> highlight it in case that was an error.
>
The "typically used ones" in the commit message "captures" that. Further
more _AO is just a variant of the non-_AO resources, referring to votes
that should only apply when the CPU subsystem is not power collapsed.
So what you have in this list is 10 power domains.
I added defines for all 13 in the DT binding, so comparing with that
you'll see that the missing ones are DDR, MSS and XO. I don't see how we
would use these from Linux today. So let's postpone adding them until we
have a use case.
> I attempted to find where this sort of thing is defined downstream, but
> failed :(
>
In direwolf-regulators.dtsi you'll find entries with qcom,resource-name
of "*.lvl". These resource names are matches against the Command DB
registry, which you can dump using the cmd-db file in debugfs.
Regards,
Bjorn
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> > +
> > +static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc8280xp_desc = {
> > + .rpmhpds = sc8280xp_rpmhpds,
> > + .num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8280xp_rpmhpds),
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id rpmhpd_match_table[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sa8540p-rpmhpd", .data = &sa8540p_desc },
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7180_desc },
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-rpmhpd", .data = &sc7280_desc },
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-rpmhpd", .data = &sc8180x_desc },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-rpmhpd", .data = &sc8280xp_desc },
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd", .data = &sdm845_desc },
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd", .data = &sdx55_desc},
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd", .data = &sdx65_desc},
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
>
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 16:35:05 -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Add compatibles and power-domain definitions for the sc8280xp and sa8540p
> platforms.
>
> Bjorn Andersson (3):
> dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add sc8280xp RPMh power-domains
> soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Don't warn about sparse rpmhpd arrays
> soc: qcom: rpmhpd: add sc8280xp & sa8540p rpmh power-domains
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add sc8280xp RPMh power-domains
commit: dbfb5f94e084287f0a3f23d14ef6692c43c98855
[2/3] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Don't warn about sparse rpmhpd arrays
commit: af77132e9d2bc8ca477003fef15e2c677ae958b1
[3/3] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: add sc8280xp & sa8540p rpmh power-domains
commit: f68f1cb3437d338ee88a9fc05acd19dacdb9aabd
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>